• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

Majority of Scientist agree with Islamic view of the Universe

mikeb768

Muse
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
714
Although the verses have been confirmed they remain malcontent,
But why such aversion to what has been sent?

If naught had come down then this day would be unjust,
But with the revelation thereof the event is must.

Those willfully ignorant will speak “Who has woken us from our sleep”,
While the reprobates and the sinners will wish the earth would them keep.

They will question themselves repeatedly “How was it that we were so greatly deceived?”,
But with the predetermined time now expired, they will wish they would have believed.

As the fetters are bound tightly and various groups led away,
Many will speak out against those who led them astray.

They shall cry out that the penalty of the leaders be greatly increased,
Although the response to their cries will cause double on each.
While this is something which you can’t yet comprehend,
Masses will regret having been heedless to the message he did send.


Muhammad was 5 for 5 when describing the Universe
Early in the seventh century a illiterate and unlearned man by the name of Muhammad (pubh) stated that the heavens (which include the stars, planets, etc.) and the earth were all joined together as one before God separated everything.

Since the mid 1900's and up until present day scientist are in agreement regarding what has been come to be known as the “Big Bang”.

[Quran 21:30] “Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder?”


Scientist agree that early universe mainly existed in a gas like state, also the presence of “smoke” after a large explosion is something which is quite common.

The Quran describes the universe in its early stages can be described as being like “smoke” which then came together to form objects.
[Quran 41:11] “Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, "Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion." They said, "We have come willingly."


Science testifies to the fact that the universe is not something which is static but something which continues to expand. The Arabic word "moosiaaoona" in the term "inna lamoosiaaoona," translated into English as "it is We Who are steadily expanding it", comes from the verb "evsea," meaning "to expand." The prefix "la" emphasises the following name or title and adds a sense of "to a great extent." This expression therefore means "We expand the sky or the universe to a great extent."
[Quran 51:47] “And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.”


The Quran correctly identifies the age of the Earth as being one third the age of the universe. The age of the universe is 13.77 billion years, the age of the earth is 4.54 billion years.

13.77 divided by 4.54 = 3.033 or 3:1 ratio, Just as six days divided by two days (simplified) = 3 or a ratio of 3:1

Total time of creation for heavens and Earth was six days
[Quran 7:54, 10:3, 11:7, 25:59] Creation of the Heavens and the Earth in six days

Formation of the Earth was two days
[Quran 41:9] “He who created the earth in two days”


Science agrees to the fact that Iron is something which is of non earthly origin (Iron's non Earthly origin), but something which was sent down.

Although banded iron formations were laid down in the time between 3,700 million years ago and 1,800 million years ago, they were in fact sent down to Earth. Iron's very common presence in rocky planets like Earth is due to its abundant production as a result of fusion in high-mass stars.

[Quran 57:25] “And We sent down iron”


Arguments regarding the measurement of Time
Some like to use the argument that if a day is 24 hours then a six day creation story makes little sense. I agree, and also consider it to a completely baseless and silly argument to try and place God within our own Earth time. Not only that but while we are bound by time, it is only rational to think God operates outside of the boundaries of time, something which was itself created.


Major Mistakes regarding the Universe found in the Bible
-Age of the universe is Not 6000 years
By attempting to show the genealogy of Adam all the way to Jesus, thereby showing the Christian Creation story to be approx. six thousand years. (The Quran does not provide any specific amount of time as this).

-God needing to rest, as in the “on the seventh day he rested” [Genesis 2:2].
God being all powerful it would be contradictory to his nature that he also requires rest. The Quran does not contain such a statement.

-Other incorrect assessments which have been identified and are said to be based up Biblical sources include: The Earth as the center of the universe, the Earth having four corners, and the 6000 year old Earth theory which places mankind and dinosaurs within the same period of time, something which some Christians have tried to reconcile sometimes with strange and even somewhat humors results: A Scientist Visits A Creationist Museum.
 
also the presence of “smoke” after a large explosion is something which is quite common.

The Quran describes the universe in its early stages can be described as being like “smoke” which then came together to form objects.
[Quran 41:11] “Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, "Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion." They said, "We have come willingly."
The Big Bang was not a large explosion.

Formation of the Earth was two days
[Quran 41:9] “He who created the earth in two days”
Show me a scientist that agrees with this.

Looks like the book got it wrong.
 
The Quran correctly identifies the age of the Earth as being one third the age of the universe. The age of the universe is 13.77 billion years, the age of the earth is 4.54 billion years.

13.77 divided by 4.54 = 3.033 or 3:1 ratio, Just as six days divided by two days (simplified) = 3 or a ratio of 3:1

Total time of creation for heavens and Earth was six days
[Quran 7:54, 10:3, 11:7, 25:59] Creation of the Heavens and the Earth in six days

Formation of the Earth was two days
[Quran 41:9] “He who created the earth in two days”


No, the Quran is claiming that the length of time it took to create the earth was 1/3 the time it took to create the entire universe. It doesn't say anything about the earth's age in that passage.

Only by conflating two unrelated values can your math work.

Fail.
 
Majority of Scientist agree with Islamic view of the Universe

No, they don't.

Although the verses have been confirmed they remain malcontent,
But why such aversion to what has been sent?

If naught had come down then this day would be unjust,
But with the revelation thereof the event is must.

Those willfully ignorant will speak “Who has woken us from our sleep”,
While the reprobates and the sinners will wish the earth would them keep.

They will question themselves repeatedly “How was it that we were so greatly deceived?”,
But with the predetermined time now expired, they will wish they would have believed.

As the fetters are bound tightly and various groups led away,
Many will speak out against those who led them astray.

They shall cry out that the penalty of the leaders be greatly increased,
Although the response to their cries will cause double on each.
While this is something which you can’t yet comprehend,
Masses will regret having been heedless to the message he did send.

From numerology to bad poetry? I guess that's an improvement...

[Quran 21:30] “Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder?”

That has nothing to do with the state of the early universe according to cosmological theories, but with the Qur'an merely reiterating Genesis 1.

The Quran correctly identifies the age of the Earth as being one third the age of the universe. The age of the universe is 13.77 billion years, the age of the earth is 4.54 billion years.

13.77 divided by 4.54 = 3.033 or 3:1 ratio, Just as six days divided by two days (simplified) = 3 or a ratio of 3:1

Total time of creation for heavens and Earth was six days
[Quran 7:54, 10:3, 11:7, 25:59] Creation of the Heavens and the Earth in six days

Formation of the Earth was two days
[Quran 41:9] “He who created the earth in two days”

Hokulele adequately addressed this nonsense.

[EDIT: And, actually, while you cite Q41:11 to support your notion that the "smoke" described in it is equivalent to the state of the early universe, looking at all of Q419-12 presents kind of a problem for your theory: "Say, 'Do you indeed disbelieve in He who created the earth in two days and attribute to Him equals? That is the Lord of the worlds.' And He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface, and He blessed it and determined therein its [creatures'] sustenance in four days without distinction - for [the information] of those who ask. Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, 'Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion.' They said, 'We have come willingly.' And He completed them as seven heavens within two days and inspired in each heaven its command. And We adorned the nearest heaven with lamps and as protection. That is the determination of the Exalted in Might, the Knowing."

God created Earth in two days, spent four days making it suitable for life, then spent two days completing the heavens and the Earth. And that, no matter how you slice it, does not correspond in any way to any scientific cosmological theory (not least because it implies that God created the Earth first, and then created the rest of the Universe (including the stars ["lamps"]).]

Science agrees to the fact that Iron is something which is of non earthly origin (Iron's non Earthly origin), but something which was sent down.

Although banded iron formations were laid down in the time between 3,700 million years ago and 1,800 million years ago, they were in fact sent down to Earth. Iron's very common presence in rocky planets like Earth is due to its abundant production as a result of fusion in high-mass stars.

[Quran 57:25] “And We sent down iron”

That tortures the semantic meaning of "sent down" so much that it ought to be banned by the Geneva Convention.
 
Last edited:
... Science agrees to the fact that Iron is something which is of non earthly origin (Iron's non Earthly origin), but something which was sent down.

Although banded iron formations were laid down in the time between 3,700 million years ago and 1,800 million years ago, they were in fact sent down to Earth. Iron's very common presence in rocky planets like Earth is due to its abundant production as a result of fusion in high-mass stars.
Muhammad knew nothing about nuclear fusion in high-mass stars, or about iron deposited following the oxygenation of the atmosphere resulting from the evolution of photosynthesis. Or if Muhammad did know about these things, he was successful in concealing the fact.

The reference to "sending down" iron surely refers to iron meteorites, not infrequently found in desert areas where they stand out against sand, and are not concealed by vegetation or standing water. Here we may recall that an evidently meteoritic stone is at the very centre of Islamic worship!

The earliest experience of pure iron enjoyed by human beings was with meteorites. For iron otherwise occurs in earth now only in combination with other elements. Thus in many languages the words for "star" (as in "shooting" or "falling" star) and "iron" are cognates. In French "sidéral" means "stellar" while "sidérurgie" means the iron industry. The Latin word "stella" is related to English "steel".

So no God-given miraculous knowledge was required by Muhammad, merely an experience of meteorites, which we know the peoples of the ancient Near East possessed, for reasons I have given. The veneration of stones "fallen from Heaven" is well attested, not only in the case of Islam, but in that of the naughty gay teenage Syrian-born Roman emperor Elagabalus, born 203/4 see http://ancienthistory.about.com/cs/biocategory/a/elagabalus.htm, reigned 218 to 222. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elagabalus_(deity). A Roman coin depicting such a stone in the temple at Emesa is to be seen at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bronze-Uranius_Antoninus-Elagabal_stone-SGI_4414.jpg.
 
Last edited:
Interestingly, while Mecca, Saudi Arabia is southeast of Jacksonville, the intial great-circle bearing when leavin JAX is northeast. Facing northeast is facing th shortest distance to Mecca. :)
 
[Quran 21:30] “Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder?”

That has nothing to do with the state of the early universe according to cosmological theories, but with the Qur'an merely reiterating Genesis 1.

Can you be more specific? What verse in Genesis 1 are you referring to?
 
Majority of Scientist agree with Islamic view of the Universe

How is it then that muslims did not find what modern science say long time ago, before the scientists? These kinds of claims remember me of 'Nostradamus predicted this [earthquake, war etc, insert whatever major current event you want here] in his books!'. Always post-factum...
 
Last edited:
Can you be more specific? What verse in Genesis 1 are you referring to?


So all these posts demonstrating your claim is nonsense and you fixate on this as the most important thing you need to respond to?
 
Interestingly, while Mecca, Saudi Arabia is southeast of Jacksonville, the intial great-circle bearing when leavin JAX is northeast. Facing northeast is facing th shortest distance to Mecca. :)


Do you really think the shortest path from Jacksonville to Mecca is to the northeast? The map is a plane (not the aircraft, the geometry thing). The territory is a sphere. If I was a coconut-laden swallow, I would surely fly ESE from Jacksonville for my Haj.
 
Can you be more specific? What verse in Genesis 1 are you referring to?
How odd! Do you not realise that to "cleave asunder" the heavens and the earth means to separate them? If you know that then there is no big problem finding the corresponding verses of Genesis 1.
... 7 And God made the expanse and separated the waters that were under the expanse from the waters that were above the expanse. And it was so ... 9 And God said, “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear.” And it was so. 10 God called the dry land Earth, and the waters that were gathered together he called Seas. And God saw that it was good.
 
Last edited:
The Quran correctly identifies the age of the Earth as being one third the age of the universe. The age of the universe is 13.77 billion years, the age of the earth is 4.54 billion years.

13.77 divided by 4.54 = 3.033 or 3:1 ratio, Just as six days divided by two days (simplified) = 3 or a ratio of 3:1

Total time of creation for heavens and Earth was six days
[Quran 7:54, 10:3, 11:7, 25:59] Creation of the Heavens and the Earth in six days

Formation of the Earth was two days
[Quran 41:9] “He who created the earth in two days”

Two points,

First, age of the earth: 4.54 billion years (aka "two days")
4.54 billion * 3 = 13.62 billion (aka "six days")

By that 3:1 scheme, the Quran has the universe being 150,000,000 years younger than in reality. That's the difference between "A Pliosaurus harassing a Leedsichthys in a Jurassic sea,"wp and a JREF forum flame war.

More charitably, 13.77 billion / 3 = 4.59 billion, which is only 50 million years more than the actual age of earth, is merely the difference between Pakicetus and the modern whales that descended from it.

Second, everything else that's wrong with what you wrote!
 
Last edited:
If you're at the point of Earth exactly opposite from Mecca it's any way you want.:)
Suppose on a great circle a mosque was located exactly half way round the world from Mecca, so that the part of the congregation at the back were closer if they faced in the exact opposite direction from their fellow Muslims at the front. On a world map it might be interesting to mark the ("isoqiblic"?) lines joining the points at which that would happen.
 
Last edited:
How odd! Do you not realise that to "cleave asunder" the heavens and the earth means to separate them? If you know that then there is no big problem finding the corresponding verses of Genesis 1.

Still scratching my head as to how you managed to conflate [Genesis1:6-9] with [Quran 21:30]. That is quite a stretch.

[Quran 21:30] “Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder?”

[Genesis1:6-9]
6 And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.” 7 So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.

9 And God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.” And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground “land,” and the gathered waters he called “seas.” And God saw that it was good.
 
Still scratching my head as to how you managed to conflate [Genesis1:6-9] with [Quran 21:30]. That is quite a stretch.

Because both describe the exact same thing: there being only a single unit of creation before God split it in two and separated the part that became the heavens from the part that became the Earth.
 
The antipode of Mecca is a point in the middle of the South Pacific

screenshot_11.png
 
Still scratching my head as to how you managed to conflate [Genesis1:6-9] with [Quran 21:30]. That is quite a stretch.

[Quran 21:30] “Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder?”

[Genesis1:6-9]
6 And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.” 7 So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.

9 And God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.” And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground “land,” and the gathered waters he called “seas.” And God saw that it was good.
Eh? "Sky" on one side, and "land" plus "seas" on the other. If that isn't the cleaving asunder of heaven and earth, then words have no meaning!
 
So all these posts demonstrating your claim is nonsense and you fixate on this as the most important thing you need to respond to?

In all sincerity I'm eagerly awaiting an honest rebuttal to the things which I have posted. As it stands not one point which I have presented (on the topic of Science being in universal agreement as to what Muhammad revealed over 1400 years ago) has yet to be debunked or dis-proven.

Most of the comments so far are have been completely asinine, with one guy went so far as to completely throw logic and science out of the window by writing that the "The Big Bang was not a large explosion", smh.
The Big Bang was not a large explosion.


Other posters have referred to original post as:
uninteresting, pathetic nonsense
but provide no bases, context, or specifics.


The reference to "sending down" iron surely refers to iron meteorites, not infrequently found in desert areas where they stand out against sand, and are not concealed by vegetation or standing water.

Even CraigB's post which was well thought out, falls short by providing no source for his claims. Iron a metal which was used throughout the world and especially during the middle ages although there is no evidence that people of early times waiting for small amounts of iron to fall from the sky. The overwhelming majority of this metal was mined from the ground. Can you imagine any King or ruler just sitting around and patiently waiting for iron ore (of random size/amount) to fall out of the sky at some random location, before being able to fit his army with items of warfare. Also if there is evidence that contradicts this just provide it rather than speculate on the frequency of meteorites landing in the desert sands of Arabia.

Even the reference to Black Stone, which thought to be meteorite is incorrect, seeing as it is not composed of iron, not sent down during the time of the prophet, and although it has been placed on the Kabaa it's significance is thought to be more symbolic than religious in nature.
 
Last edited:
The Latin word "stella" is related to English "steel".

Small point, not that I'm married to Wiktionary or anything, but it says that "stella" is "from Proto-Italic *stērolā, from Proto-Indo-European *h₂stḗr."

Whereas "steel" is "from Middle English stele, stel, from Old English (North) stēle, (South) stȳle, from Proto-Germanic *stahliją... enlargement of *stahlą... from Proto-Indo-European *stak- ‘to stay, be firm.’" Do you know otherwise?
 
In all sincerity I'm eagerly awaiting an honest rebuttal to the things which I have posted. As it stands not one point which I have presented (on the topic of Science being in universal agreement as to what Muhammad revealed over 1400 years ago) has yet to be debunked or dis-proven.

Odd because my reading is that a number of people have pointed out that your shoehorning aside the standard cosmological model bears no resemblance to the 'magic' version espoused in the Koran, which is in itself just a retelling of the version in the old testament, which in turn draws on still older sources. I also find it rather odd that you are willing to draw upon the ages of the Earth and the universe derived from scientific understanding that seems to leave little room for your super magician.

Even CraigB's post which was well thought out, falls short by providing no source for his claims. Iron a metal which was used throughout the world and especially during the middle ages although there is no evidence that people of early times waiting for small amounts of iron to fall from the sky.

And this is just misrepresentation. he said they observed meteorites and this is where the concept of iron being sent down from the sky came from. He did not state or imply that they sat around waiting for it to happen or that they did not mine iron. Of course having observed it falling from the skies its hardly a stretch to imagine that they might have inferred that all iron had arrived from the sky originally and simply 'rusted' and been buried over time.
 
Last edited:
The Quran correctly identifies the age of the Earth as being one third the age of the universe. The age of the universe is 13.77 billion years, the age of the earth is 4.54 billion years.

The only thing that the Quran identifies are six and two days respectively, which according to you are the age of the earth and the age of the universe. Six days for the universe, and two days for the earth. Clearly wrong. The earth is older than two days.

Stupid sophistry.
 
Last edited:
The only thing that the Quran identifies are six and two days respectively, which according to you are the age of the earth and the age of the universe. Six days for the universe, and two days for the earth. Clearly wrong.

As Q 41:9-12 show, it doesn't even do that.
 
The only thing that the Quran identifies are six and two days respectively, which according to you are the age of the earth and the age of the universe. Six days for the universe, and two days for the earth. Clearly wrong. The earth is older than two days.

Stupid sophistry.

Allah created the earth in two days? It took that slacker Yahweh six. Allah kicks but.:D
 
Odd because my reading is that a number of people have pointed out that your shoehorning aside the standard cosmological model bears no resemblance to the 'magic' version espoused in the Koran, which is in itself just a retelling of the version in the old testament, which in turn draws on still older sources.

Care to clarify your argument by providing specifics?
Craig B also made similar claims, but after further evaluation it was easy to see that the claim regarding Genesis 1 being the source of this was quite baseless.

Also are you referring to the Quran as being "magic" and if so why?
 
Last edited:
It doesn't? I was going by what the OP posted.

I made an edit to my first post in this thread which covered that:

[EDIT: And, actually, while you cite Q41:11 to support your notion that the "smoke" described in it is equivalent to the state of the early universe, looking at all of Q419-12 presents kind of a problem for your theory: "Say, 'Do you indeed disbelieve in He who created the earth in two days and attribute to Him equals? That is the Lord of the worlds.' And He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface, and He blessed it and determined therein its [creatures'] sustenance in four days without distinction - for [the information] of those who ask. Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, 'Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion.' They said, 'We have come willingly.' And He completed them as seven heavens within two days and inspired in each heaven its command. And We adorned the nearest heaven with lamps and as protection. That is the determination of the Exalted in Might, the Knowing."

God created Earth in two days, spent four days making it suitable for life, then spent two days completing the heavens and the Earth. And that, no matter how you slice it, does not correspond in any way to any scientific cosmological theory (not least because it implies that God created the Earth first, and then created the rest of the Universe (including the stars ["lamps"]).]

Again, it's simply a repetition of what's in Genesis: God created the Earth in a couple of days, spent a few days making it habitable (putting plants and animals on it), and devoted a couple more days arranging heaven and putting lights up there.
 
Care to clarify your argument by providing specifics?


I am not Garrison, but you are conflating the age of the earth with the time the Quran claims it took to create the earth (and as ANTPogo demonstrated, even that claim is incorrect). More than one person has pointed this out, and you have remained silent on the topic.
 
Again, it's simply a repetition of what's in Genesis: God created the Earth in a couple of days, spent a few days making it habitable (putting plants and animals on it), and devoted a couple more days arranging heaven and putting lights up there.

In Genesis 1 of the Bible, God is said to have created the heavens and the earth on the First Day, Water on the second Day, Light appears after the earth? The sun (a clear source of "light") was no doubt formed before the earth.

All these scientific mistakes are exposed by examining just the first four lines of Genesis! These statements are out of alignment (in both sequence and duration) with modern science. On the other hand the statements which I have shown regarding the ratio of time when comparing the age of the universe to the age of the Earth are quite in sync with science.

Genesis 1
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.

3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
 
I am not Garrison, but you are conflating the age of the earth with the time the Quran claims it took to create the earth (and as ANTPogo demonstrated, even that claim is incorrect). More than one person has pointed this out, and you have remained silent on the topic.

That is something which would depend on one's definition of when earth was finished being created (which may vary).
 
In Genesis 1 of the Bible, God is said to have created the heavens and the earth on the First Day, Water on the second Day, Light appears after the earth? The sun (a clear source of "light") was no doubt formed before the earth.

Where does the Qur'an specify what was created on which day? Where does it say that the Earth was created during the last two days, instead of the first two days of the six-day period?
 
I made an edit to my first post in this thread which covered that:



Again, it's simply a repetition of what's in Genesis: God created the Earth in a couple of days, spent a few days making it habitable (putting plants and animals on it), and devoted a couple more days arranging heaven and putting lights up there.

Oops, thanks. So, overall eight days, do I see this correctly?
 
Back
Top Bottom