Loss Leader

You were among my favorite posters, on any forum. Farewell...

Goodbye my friend. Perhaps we shall meet again in a far future once the universe recycles.

Thanks. I got all the time in the world. Just wondered if anybody was still reading that old thread.

Would you mind taking the JFK thread off moderation now that the no. 1 cause of all the problems has been suspended?

Happy B day LL

Did you receive my previous PM? If so, I am disappointed that you did not reply. I have read the rules in their entirety, BTW.

Anyway, I'm not all that concerned about that particular post. I have a zillion other arguments which are much more important. I do however, have another request. Let's talk about the case and the evidence that's been presented. Perhaps we could do this, more in the form of a discussion than a debate.

Do you have Skype? The video isn't necessary, but Skype permits a text box to be open, while a verbal discussion is going on. That makes it easy to link or even transfer files to each other.

Interested? I'm retired and have a pretty open schedule. Let me know what time would be good for you.

Hey Loss Leader. That post you gave me a warning about. I did address the argument. In case you haven't noticed, the argument as presented by Francesca, was that I was "flip-flopping" on my viewpoints of certain members. I should have a right to defend myself against personal attacks such as that. And I completely disagree. It wasn't "impolite," so not a violation of rule 12 IMO.

Loss Leader,
- Is it still possible to view the older files?
--- Jabba

Hi Loss Leader, another instance of the infracted rule 0 is still in my post:
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=10162828&postcount=1886

I apologize, I see where I erred. "Tammersham" (I don't presume to speak Whelsh...) had every right to be accepted with all do respect...

You dropped the word "delusional" on my reference to Noreen Renier's visionary descriptions of an airplane crash where she saw survivors. There were no survivors, no discovery of the plane by people on snowmobiles, no mountain on which the plane was found, no old gas station nearby, etc., etc. Her psychic visions --- every single one including claiming she saw one male passenger with a broken leg carrying another female passenger --- both still alive --- when the medical examiner declared all passengers had died instantly. I believe my word delusional should stand. It certainly is not name calling as you reference. It's a fact. And one cited in relationship to her airplane visionary claim as specifically referenced.

I just posted two comments to the Apollo thread. The second one I intended to submit to the Stundie thread but accidentally submitted it to the Apollo thread. Could you please delete that one?

Hi LL,

I was wondering if you could tell me why this thread was moved to forum community?

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=223156

It seemed to me that the OP, while using some lighthearted language was serious about asking for skeptical advice. Is there something I am missing?

Thanks, Canis

Please explain how " 'Ideological' is an uncomplimentary way to say 'systematic' or 'principled'. Antonyms include 'scatter-brained' and 'unscrupulous' " is an attack on another member. I empbace "ideological" for the reason given. It's people who toss "ideological" around who make verbal attacks,

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!! May you have a hundred more

Welcome back. Only ran across you a couple of minutes ago.

You are back!

Welcome back home, sir. I've missed you.

happy bday!!!!!!!