JohnG
Pedantic Bore
Why do you think I posted it?
That's what I like about your posts. They're self-debunking. Certainly saves a lot of time and effort all around.
Why do you think I posted it?
HAHAHAH! That pic again! lmao! You should do some research on that one.![]()
Are you saying concret CAN melt without melting steel, and then turn back to concrete? Were they lying or incompetent? Hint: "miistaken" is the same as "incompetent".
I expect no one to believe anything anyone says without checking the facts. I welcome it, but I notice no one does that around here.
Why do you think I posted it?
Because there was no molten metal, but because of rumors started by the NYPD and the FDNY, photos like that were all the rage as proof of molten metal.
But we know there wasn't any.
So why did YOU think I posted it? What was it that made you lyao?
Everyone loves the TeeVee. Especially people who like to label other people.
Seems the NYPD has a robust forensics lab that is currently seeking help. What sort of work does a criminologist do?
And how about the museum (don't say propaganda). Are they indoctrinating school children about what happened on 9/11?
http://www.nycpolicemuseum.org/
Here's the floor plan where you can see the exhibits. Seems they're still exploiting 9/11. On the first floor there's an interactive exhibit for children designed to teach the skills and fundamentals of police work; such as verifying whether concrete can melt before one builds a museum exhibit that might give school children the impression concrete CAN melt.
http://www.nycpm.org/PDF/floorplan/Floorplan_English.pdf
Eh! Wrong... Try again!
(You'll see the humor when you find out who "enhanced" that pic and why. HAHAHA)
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves"
~Vladimir Lenin
Why would "truthers" be pushing the same fake "hot fires" meme as the government? Golly, for the life of me I just can't figure this one out, maybe I should ask a scientist like Steven Jones or Judy Wood, eh?
You posted the doctored photo as if it was actually from the FDNY. Why lie?
Now that we can see how the ironically-named truth movement was pushing the false hot-fires meme that was started by such government organizations as the FDNY, NYPD and FEMA, can anyone answer why the USGS claims of hot spots are legitimate?
[qimg]http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/docs/hotspots_usgs.jpg[/qimg]
It was an example of the fraud that was used to support the lie.
Now who's LMAO?
Thank you for the admission of your incompetence...
/thread
You know there was a parking garage underneath full of cars, which in turn, were filled with gasoline. That's just one of thousands of possible sources.


What did they say?
The New York City Police Museum
100 Old Slip
New York, NY 10005
tel: 212-480-3100
fax: 212-480-9757
email: [email protected]
What did they say, when you discovered they might of made a mistake when the gun was crushed and corroded on 911?
You know there was a parking garage underneath full of cars, which in turn, were filled with gasoline. That's just one of thousands of possible sources.
Sooo - you're saying the gas in the cars in the parking garage reached 900 kelvin?
Given that gas alone burns at 800 Kelvin, and there were other combustibles present, where's the problem?Sooo - you're saying the gas in the cars in the parking garage reached 900 kelvin?
Nope.You don't think the maps might be just as much BS as the fake photos from the truth movement, and the bogus stories of molten steel from the fire department, and the museum exhibit of molten concrete from the police department?
Well, 110 storeys x2 of offices and services have quite a lot of combustible materials. Have you never been in an office? Surely, even you can list combustion sources found in a typical office.You're leaning on the cars, or is that just the first straw you're clutching for to avoid looking at the evidence with a clear mind? You said the cars were just one reason of thousands. Okay, I've got the time, give me a couple hunded explanations.
Desks, chairs, paper, partitions etc, etc. from 2x 110 storey offices. I refuse to believe anyone in the world could be this obtuse.What other explanations do you have for the firefighters being mistaken about the molten steel, the police museum indoctrinating children AND now the USGS maps?
The cars? That's it?
Given that gas alone burns at 800 Kelvin, and there were other combustibles present, where's the problem?
Nope.
Well, 110 storeys x2 of offices and services have quite a lot of combustible materials. Have you never been in an office? Surely, even you can list combustion sources found in a typical office.
Desks, chairs, paper, partitions etc, etc. from 2x 110 storey offices. I refuse to believe anyone in the world could be this obtuse.
No air to 'combust' ...