Reports on Steel show temps as high as 1000C ; science beats fantasy
Where is the evidence of this burning office debris? I didn't see anything other than a cloud of dust. Why do you assume all 220 floors were fully occupied? Have you checked? I have and they weren't, so no, there were absolutely not 220acres of office materials. Some floors looked like this:
Wow, you don't know who was in the WTC? But you ask a question you can't answer. You never do supply fact, you prefer fantasy.
It is called math, you know, math. You don't do math, you are anti-education. You said so.
yankee451 said:
... an interview with Jim Fetzer where I said 9/11 has become a psychological struggle, so I'm with you. I'm of the mind that higher education is simply higher indoctrination. There's a reason a doctorate sounds so close to indoctrinate.
I agree, with you 911 is psychological, and you have a failed fantasy.
Office space with real people murdered on 911.
Really? Prove it. You don't do research, it would be a first.
LOL, you debunked your debris pile too small. You are showing the WTC is 95 percent air, even when occupied as above. You can't rent space that is solid concrete and steel. BINGO
You debunk all you post. wow
And only if we take at face value what the authorities say - the same fellas who are telling us the ground was super-duper hot for a long time. But alas, even their "fully occupied towers" is a sham:
The temperatures you posted were real, very hot. But you make up nonsenses.
Why can't you name your sources?
The steel recovered from the debris pile showed a eutectic (science stuff, you don't do chemical engineering, guess who used your tax dollars to take Chem Eng 101, ME, LOL) with temperatures of 1000C. BINGO, I posted the correct temperature, and researched the steel, while you ask question you don't know the answer to. lol, You are at zero, I am near 1,000,017. Sorry, but education is good, your fantasy is a legacy your grandkids will be sad about.
Still, there is this interesting post about why the fires could not get so hot.
The fires were hot. You sitting next to your wood-stove? Do you use it? LOL
Your own video debunks you. Your wood stove debunks you, and your wood stove is literally dumber than a box of rocks. Irony, with extra iron.
So again, can you tell me where you get your wild figures for the heat? NYPD, FDNY, or FEMA by any chance? Can we compare their models to the link above? Where do you get your figures?
From chemical engineering, call science. You do fantasy, I listened in class when I was not sleeping. lol
I got an education, you got fantasy. You are the winner. You paid for my education if you paid US taxes. More irony. Thank you, thank you very much.
I don't despise anything but I'm sure our ideas of education differ greatly.
You are anti-education and it shows as you spew a fantasy so intellectually bankrupt, it hurts my head. What a legacy for you grandkids. I served 28 years, and I think anti-war protest and attitude is good, and part of our right to protest and have opinions... etc
But spreading lies and fantasy on 911, I find to be dumb, immature and nonsense.
No, it is not a debate. You have fantasy, and your wood stove debunks you.
No, stop projecting and pay attention - because the only proof of "hot fires" comes from the authorities who have twice been exposed "fibbing" about this very crime, why would you accept their word about anything else without first checking the facts?
Fire burned for weeks, months. You don't do science so you don't understand that your wood stove debunks your latest fantasy.
You now ignore 220 acres of debris burning. Not new for you to ignore reality and lie about 911.
It is funny, the sensors take the temperature at the surface, and the fires buried at the WTC were much hotter than the surface temp.
I got the eutectic which shows temperature, you don't have anything. Why are you evidence free. Your sources debunk you. Why do you hate the police? Did you have problems? Do you use your wood-stove? My wood stove gets up to 1600 F.
lol, got you to post
I watched all your videos, they are all nonsense. I say this a human, and as an engineer, as a pilot, as a retied USAF officer, as a kid who took calculus, chemistry and physics all in high school. What do you say about education?
yankee451 said:
... higher education is simply higher indoctrination. There's a reason a doctorate sounds so close to indoctrinate.
You hate higher education. Funny, I learned physics, chemistry, and math, in high school, exempted the finals in college, in calculus, chemistry, and physics. You and education don't mix. Or do you want to take back your Internet legacy of anti-intellectualism?
Do you treat mistakes by your kids, the same as the melted concrete? With hate and fantasy? What a legacy.
