Will you answer the question?
Are the USGS maps correct? Hot spots above 1100 degees fahrenheit? Yes? No? Dodge?
1100°F is totally unremarkable in an office fire. The USGS maps don't surprise me one bit. What's your point?
Will you answer the question?
Are the USGS maps correct? Hot spots above 1100 degees fahrenheit? Yes? No? Dodge?
Is this your way of saying yes the USGS maps are correct, that the ground was 1100 degrees. Under ground. No air to 'combust' all that slow-burning gasoline.
There were 220 acres of office materials to burn in the debris pile. The heat energy of the office material would be equal to more heat energy than the heat of 15,000 TONS of thermite; is that enough heat for your fantasy claims on 911. Not counting the cars and stuff in the basement. Cars burn hot, but you don't do education stuff.Is this your way of saying yes the USGS maps are correct, that the ground was 1100 degrees. Under ground. No air to 'combust' all that slow-burning gasoline.
I'll take this as a "yes", as if I ever doubted it.
You come to a debate no 911, unarmed.yankee451 said:Agreed - ... I'm of the mind that higher education is simply higher indoctrination. There's a reason a doctorate sounds so close to indoctrinate.
Is this your way of saying yes the USGS maps are correct, that the ground was 1100 degrees. Under ground. No air to 'combust' all that slow-burning gasoline.
I'll take this as a "yes", as if I ever doubted it.
1100°F is totally unremarkable in an office fire. The USGS maps don't surprise me one bit. What's your point?
There was a subway system down there.
Gasoline burns very fast.
There were many other fuel sources.

Are you saying the pile was a vacuum?![]()
There was a subway system down there.
Gasoline burns very fast.
There were many other fuel sources.
Gasoline burns fast and then it's gone. The ground was hotter than gas burns days afterwards.
Are you able to even admit for a second that it just might be possible the "really hot fires" story is B.S.? Or do you need to believe that for some reason?
Unremarkable that five days after an office fire wiped out three buildings, and even though the fire was visibly burning out and clearly extinguished in the destruction, it was still over 1100 hundred degrees without the benefit of fuel and air?
If you say so chief.
No air to 'combust' all that slow-burning gasoline.
I'm not sure what that means.
]
Hint: "miistaken" is the same as "incompetent".
Will you answer the question?
Are the USGS maps correct? Hot spots above 1100 degees fahrenheit? Yes? No? Dodge?
Actually, you said 800 kelvin before. That would make it just under 1000 degrees fahrenheit. Why would someone put out data the refutes molten steel as proof of molten steel?
[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Hot-Spot-temps.png[/qimg]
)http://yankee451.com/about-me-2/Unremarkable that five days after an office fire wiped out three buildings, and even though the fire was visibly burning out and clearly extinguished in the destruction, it was still over 1100 hundred degrees without the benefit of fuel and air?
If you say so chief.
More evidence of no molten steel. Good job. You showed them! (exactly what, I have no idea?! /Dangerfield)