Moderated The NYPD and Molten Concrete

yankee451

Master Poster
Joined
Feb 1, 2013
Messages
2,794
Corruption in big-city police departments is legendary. Countless movies about dirty cops litter the video shelves; movies like Serpico, Internal Affairs, and the Godfather depict corruption everywhere. Everyone’s aware of Philadelphia PD corruption, of the LAPD and Rodney King, etc., etc. To a lesser known extent, but likely just as corrupt, come other big city departments, like the fire departments and social services, or the mayor’s offices. Influence peddling (read: graft, bribery) in local and national governments is commonplace, but we common folk prefer not to talk about it, or tell ourselves the good guys win in the end. It’s a happy fantasy.

We’ve all heard the stories about the brave FDNY and the rivers of molten steel. The fire department is presented as hero-victims of 9/11 ais therefore beyond suspicion and reproach, as is their claim of molten steel. Second only to the FDNY on the sympathy scale is the NYPD, but what many people don’t know is not only was steel in the sky turned molten by kerosene on 9/11, but according to the NYPD, it also melted concrete a thousand feet below and not only that but after it cooled, it solidified back into concrete, encasing firearms therein.

...

Edited by LashL: 
Snipped for compliance with Rule 4. Do not copy and paste lengthy tracts of text/articles from elsewhere. Instead cite a short quote and provide a link to the source.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, a no planer who posts utterly unreadable nonsense.

Oh Portland, what is it with you and the no planers?
 
There was nothing molten about the concrete. It was all turned to dust. Judy Wood proved this years ago, and it's only these last holdouts on the JREF that haven't accepted the reality of it all.
 
There was nothing molten about the concrete. It was all turned to dust. Judy Wood proved this years ago, and it's only these last holdouts on the JREF that haven't accepted the reality of it all.

Don't lie, Dusty said it was foam ;)
 
So it's a massive conspiracy by the NYPD or someone who has no clue writes something wrong on a placard for a museum.

Occam's Razor would suggest it's the latter. Er, yep definitely the latter.

/end thread.
 
Don't lie, Dusty said it was foam ;)
/cough This was the first reply in the comments section of his 911 crash test FAQs

Tracy Postert says:
August 29, 2012 at 4:39 pm

I’m an expert on what really happened to the World Trade Center, so I will put my name in as a supporter and I will advise on key details.

I'd love to see a Dusty verses De'ak thread. Stundilicious!
 
/cough This was the first reply in the comments section of his 911 crash test FAQs



I'd love to see a Dusty verses De'ak thread. Stundilicious!

That's the good thing about truther facts, there is plenty of room for everyone to be right.:)
 
So these intellectually stunted JREF denizens actually believe the concrete turned to lava and then back to concrete without melting the guns.

Fascinating.
 
So these intellectually stunted JREF denizens actually believe the concrete turned to lava and then back to concrete without melting the guns.

Fascinating.

Actually, I believe it has been established that the medium in question is dust from a variety of sources (concrete, sheetrock) mixed with water, and under pressure of combined debris formed into a solid.
 
So these intellectually stunted JREF denizens actually believe the concrete turned to lava and then back to concrete without melting the guns.

Fascinating.

Now now, sport, that sounds like a personal attack.

Look up simile.
 
Actually, I believe it has been established that the medium in question is dust from a variety of sources (concrete, sheetrock) mixed with water, and under pressure of combined debris formed into a solid.

And yet the police museum created an exhibit stating:

"Thermal imagery was used for mapping the hot spots caused by thousands of gallons of fuel buried beneath the rubble..."

"Fire temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava around anything in its path"
 
So these intellectually stunted JREF denizens actually believe the concrete turned to lava and then back to concrete without melting the guns.

Fascinating.


Do you actually think anyone here thinks that?

Fascinating.
 
So it's a massive conspiracy by the NYPD or someone who has no clue writes something wrong on a placard for a museum.

Occam's Razor would suggest it's the latter. Er, yep definitely the latter.

/end thread.

Sure - if I were to make such an "innocent" mistake, you'd be just as forgiving.

/snort
 
Do you actually think anyone here thinks that?

Fascinating.

No, because you're too smart for that.

So you agree then there's no way fires were so hot they melted concrete and there's no way "thermal hotspots were caused by thousands of gallons of fuel buried beneath the rubble".
 
So these intellectually stunted JREF denizens actually believe the concrete turned to lava and then back to concrete without melting the guns.

Fascinating.

The gun did not melt. The concrete was not melted.

You deny the moon landings, and you deny nukes exist. It is not a surprise you are full of political bias and can't figure out 911 given the answers and 11 years. You failed to make a point; you are spamming JREF with stuff that got you banned at crazy 911 truth sites. You are a 911 truther who can't find support from 911 truth. How ironic, your stuff is so stupid, 911 truth shuns you.

The only point you have made; you take random quotes, and form incoherent rant, frothing at the mouth, spewing nonsense, posting piles of BS with no purpose, no goal. Now you will project some, and repeat.
 
Last edited:
It's a tough position to be in, I know.

So were the fires hot enough to melt concrete or not?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom