That contradicts what the NYPD curator at the time, one Beth Spenelli had put on the plaque. It says "fire temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava around anything in it's path"
One would think that the people responsible for respecting those who perished on 9/11 would do their homework before asserting such a thing.
What would that debris be? Interestingly your quote brings a paper to mind from 2004 by RJ Lee group.
"The presence of lead oxide on the surface of mineral wool indicates the existence of extremely high temperatures during the collapse which caused metallic lead to volatilize, oxidize, and finally condense on the surface of the mineral wool."
RJ Lee knows/knew it takes 2800F to melt iron and upwards of 3100F+ to vaporize (volatilize) lead.
That's good to know, as I inserted RJ Lees findings from 2004
Is that what you think this is? A mistake? I supposed RJ Lee made a mistake as well? No I believe the information was taken from somewhere, where I don't know. Can't locate Beth Spenelli for some reason.
So if it's concrete then something other then fire was in the building; right?
Mistake? lol
How could the concrete be melted, it means the gun would be melted too. Have you told them the concrete did not really melt, but it looks like it did? What did they say? Are you saying the concrete did melt? The museum does not lie and say 911 was an inside job, and making a mistake is not as bad as being nuts like 911 truth and spreading lies about thermite and some undefined fantasy inside job.
Next you will be saying explosives were used because there were loud noises on 911.
Quote-mining RJ Lee, and then making up a lie that the temperature in the WTC fires was 2800F and 3100F out of thin air (googled without thinking). How do you leap to lies so quickly? The temperatures in the WTC were what you get in big office fires; try looking that up.
Is 911 an inside job for you?
What temperature does concrete become "crumbly"?
The temperatures in the WTC fires were normal for office fires. Some steel was exposed to temperatures as high as 1000C. Another report - RJ Lee never said how hot the fires were, he reported on the stuff found in a particular building - do you know what building it was? Do you know the samples were taken after clean up? No? You quote-mine, show me the temperature RJ Lee said on 911. ??
E=mgh was released on 911. More energy than 130 tons of TNT in each tower of Kinetic energy was released, which crumbled some concrete at room temperature and in fires; the energy also crushed ceiling tiles and wallboard. Most the dust was wallboard, insulations, and some was concrete. No thermite, no bombs, no inside job.
You can look up the temperature concrete has problems.
Lead was not vaporized at 3100F on 911, it was already on the mineral wool when it was installed. There was no melted steel on 911, but feel free to present some evidence. Extremely high temperatures are 1000C. You don't have to boil lead to get vaporized lead on stuff.
What is your overall 911 conclusion? Stop tap-dancing and state your claims. Save some time.
What would that debris be? Interestingly your quote brings a paper to mind from 2004 by RJ Lee group.
?
You mean this one?
Damage Assessment 130 Liberty Street Property
Report Date: December 2003
WTC Dust Signature Report
Composition and Morphology
... Where does it say
2800F to melt iron and upwards of 3100F+ to vaporize
Page number?
BTW, did you read the OP? Here is the original OP for you to read, where it appears to be a rant against NYPD, with zero stuff about melted concrete.
http://yankee451.com/2012/07/15/963/
It is not about RJ Lee, who found no thermite, and no evidence of melted steel, or melted concrete.
http://yankee451.com/2012/07/15/963/
Any comment on the original topic? Why can't you tell the museum the concrete did not melt?
What else will you present by cherrypicking RJ Lee? Something like this?
and see the "iron spheres" that they found - along with evidence of high temperature melting (not typical office fire temperature type melting).
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5313444&postcount=13
But RJ Lee says...
Particles of materials that had been modified by exposure to high temperature, such as spherical particles of iron and silicates, are common in WTC Dust because of the fire that accompanied the WTC Event, but are not common in “normal” interior office dust.
RJ Lee debunks thermite, but it take reading comprehension.
Iron-rich spheres from iron-bearing building components or contents (RJ Lee report)
RJ Lee says the rich iron spheres are from fires in the WTC because there was iron-bearing building components.
Using RJ Lee to support melted concrete is silly. What were you trying to imply?
