July 2007 Stundie Nominations

Here's another one from BAUT, and yes, this guy IS serious:
Surely they wouldn't allow all of these violations to continue. How many days have these flags been in complete darkness? - violation. How many days have they been laying on the ground? - violation. Obviously these flags aren't even on the moon.

ROFL

From this thread

As some of the posters there commented, this is quite possibly the worst CT ever
 
Malcolm tells us how to get gravity to stop working (to defend his view that nobody uses gravity-feed IV bags)

Altogether now, after me,
In order to have GRAVITY feed, you must first have GRAVITY.
No BIG hole in the top of the bag = no chance for GRAVITY to act = the photo is staged.
 
That reminds me of papageno's sig at apollohoax.net:

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]
who: "Required: One credible and reputable astrophysicist who will prove, in a peer-reviewed document, that a man can go through the Van Allen Radiation Belt unscathed. Anyone know of one?"

JayUtah: "Yes, Dr. James Van Allen. He has specifically repudiated the hoax theory."

who: "Maybe i should have been more clear. Apart from Allen..."
[/FONT]


I remember that thread. One of the responses nearly made me laugh myself onto the floor:

data cable said:
That rumbling you all hear is the sound of goalposts being moved.


:dl:
 
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=9762

by rik st albans

We are wasting time,ladies and gents.

If we cannot convince THESE people,then it Is time to give up or get tooled up.Enough talk!

comments are aimed at the structural engineers discussing 911 conspiracies on the site below

of course the truther who posted this would be able to convince these experts with his mounds of evidence and knowledge of the subject

especially using the title of his thread to judge his intelligence by

i personally think they should give up

http://www.istructe.org/forum/thread.asp?tid=877&fid=1&cid&bhcp=1
 
Ooh, a double-punch Stundie:

Fair enough, NIST also uses buring piles of debris.
Fair enough, NIST also uses buring piles of debris.
Nevertheless, my point is still the same - they have engineered ambiguity. Ambiguity is the raw material for plausible-deniability.

And the fires are (for the most part) synthetic or catalyzed.

First, when shown to be in error, Max doesn't back down but charges right ahead.

Then he brings up 'synthetic fire'! What fun!
 
How about this post over at the LC Forum, in which RevolutionJim declares:
It was common knowledge untill more recent that the sun was 3mil miles, they then put a 9 in front of it.
Simple math. The moon goes around the earth every 30 days, it completes a full cycle every 30 days. A sun cycle takes 12mos. The moon is
250,000mi
x 12
----------
3,000,000mi to the sun. We are being lied to about many things. Ready.
 
That reminds me of papageno's sig at apollohoax.net:

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]
who: "Required: One credible and reputable astrophysicist who will prove, in a peer-reviewed document, that a man can go through the Van Allen Radiation Belt unscathed. Anyone know of one?"

JayUtah: "Yes, Dr. James Van Allen. He has specifically repudiated the hoax theory."

who: "Maybe i should have been more clear. Apart from Allen..."
[/FONT]

:jaw-dropp :jaw-dropp

I don't even know if I could have believed this one if Spitfire didn't link it. "Apart from Allen..." What the hell kind of logic is that?
 
8den, you said it!

I just came to make sure that Malcolm was being nominated as he deserves. The poor guy seems to want the Stundie real bad, and I hope he gets his wish.

I see the necessary has been done but a little more won't hurt.

Malcolm is claiming that the entire scene around the Pentagon on 11th September was staged, and one of his key points is that in one picture a man is shown holding up a drip bag attached to a casualty on a stretcher. For some reason Malcolm is convinced that the need to elevate drip bags went out with MASH, and every modern picture showing such an act has been set up, and is simply showing what people expect to see rather than actual practice.

Several people (including myself, GMarshall and MortFurd) have explained to him that no, it really is normal practice to hold the bag up, and that the normal standard i/v infusion does rely on gravity to get the fluid into the patient.

So we have nomination, part 1.

This is a combined post to yourself, Rolfe and any other drip feeds.
Now I remember why I never fancied being a schoolteacher.
Altogether now, after me,
In order to have GRAVITY feed, you must first have GRAVITY.
No BIG hole in the top of the bag = no chance for GRAVITY to act = the photo is staged.


Then fls explains that no, you do normally hold up the drip bag, and she knows this because she is a doctor and uses the things all the time.

This provokes nomination, part 2.

24 carat nonsense. In order for gravity to work, you need a source of GRAVITY.


That's his opinion of a doctor, who actually uses the things. He has also accused me of "demanding respect from a position of elitism" when I explained that I do know how they work because I'm a vet.

Pomeroo opined that it doesn't get any better than this. But then Ivor the Engineer asked Malcolm, "What are viable sources of gravity?"

Which provoked nomination, part 3.

Air pressure.


Of course SpitfireIX trumped Malcolm completely by posting a string of seven photographs of emergency workers administering drips and holding the bags above the patients. So far, Malcolm's only response to this has been to ask how many of these photos are staged. I think he imagines that rather than simply photograph an actual scene, all these organisations carefully set something up for the publicity purposes, and while they're doing it, make sure to do it wrong!



He doesn't seem to understand that atmospheric pressure will still work from outside the bag so long as the bag isn't rigid. The discussion is ongoing, hindered to some extent by the thread being moderated. Will there be any further parts to this worthy and indeed unsurpassed nomination? Only time will tell.

Rolfe.
 
Last edited:
I read this article, and was stunned. Stupidity never ceases to amaze.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/10165

Well, I select this quote:

Aidan Monaghan said:
The molten metal seen emerging from the upper northeast corner of WTC 2 may have been attributable to a durable thermite utilizing device that was dislodged from the core by the impact of UA 175, which settled among the accumulated aircraft and building debris seen here within the buildings window openings

Durable thermite utilizing device... right...
 

Back
Top Bottom