July 2007 Stundie Nominations

William Rea said:
I guess that the fact that this got nominated is a reflection on how (rule8)poor the Stundies are this month.
Click to expand...

Er, William? The finals haven't been organised yet - you know, because the month isn't over? Don't you think it's a tad premature to be commenting on the quality of the finals before nominations have already closed?

And don't knock yourself either! Your quote from last month was good enough to make it into the finals alongside Craig Ranke's circular reasoning and Early Wynn's Moon Hoax nomination! You've turned out some very good Stundie finalists in your time!
 
mjd1982 comes through again! Twice!
mjd1982 said:
1. FT are implicated since they are, by definition, involved in the cover up, since this is a story that has been covered up, and they would be aware of it.
Click to expand...
Wow, the definition of cover up is FT.
mjd1982 said:
2. The evidence of the cover up is in the fact that it has been covered up- hence why Scott is the only one talking about it.
Click to expand...
So remember folks, if only one person is talking about something means there is a cover up just like someone hearing something that sounds like an explosion means a controlled demolition is about to happen. Great twoofer logic.
 
Dang, lapman, you beat me to it.

Close the poll, #2 there is clearly the winner.
 
lapman said:
mjd1982 comes through again! Twice!
Wow, the definition of cover up is FT.
So remember folks, if only one person is talking about something means there is a cover up just like someone hearing something that sounds like an explosion means a controlled demolition is about to happen. Great twoofer logic.
Click to expand...

Indeed, Mjd thinks that the fact he hasn't been fired from his job is because they're afraid he'll sue them because his allegations are true and that they know this...

Ugh.
 
This is from a "naval engineer," no less. No, really. I'm not kidding.

Heiwa said:
There are many indications on the other hand that the global collapse was initiated/caused by control demolition by remote control and that the also the undamaged section above was blown up in the air by controlled demolition before hitting the ground.
Click to expand...

Pray for t[SIZE=-1]hey that go down to the sea in ships, that do business in great waters. In Sweden.[/SIZE]
 
Gravy, I used to respect you until you started hogging all the good quotes. Now I just wish to pelt you with an assortment of overripe fruits and veggies from a great distance
 
Unsecured Coins said:
Gravy, I used to respect you until you started hogging all the good quotes. Now I just wish to pelt you with an assortment of overripe fruits and veggies from a great distance
Click to expand...

Be careful of his 16 ton weight and his tiger.
 
Legend has it that Gravy can shoot streams of fresh Thanksgiving style gravy from his eyes which he uses to burn his enemies.
 
While shouting down the suggestion that they should post 911 conspiracy theory stuff on you tube, with porn sounding names to bring it to a wider audience Ixnay has a much more sensible idea.

ixnay said:
However, hiring models to wear 9/11 gear or do shoots with themes (Guantanamo Bay for example) is a very good idea. You could extend it to softcore if you really had to, but for some people, a pretty face and a brain is a big enough turn on.
Click to expand...

I can see it now "Girls gone wild, for the troof".

This really was the flaw of the NIST report they should have released a soft core porn adaption, or at least had a centerfold or something. That would have made it much more believable.
 
I nominate this post from our good friends over at BAUT:
joshuatree said:
I really can't believe that seemingly intelligent human beings really believe that we went to the moon, the Van Allen belt would make that an impossibility in itself.

There is so much evidence out there that debunks that silly theory that its obvious that we never went near the moon.

Or do you all also think that our Government would never tell us a lie?
Click to expand...

This is from this thread, and probably isn't even his best one, you should really check it out for some gut bustingly stupid CT reasoning, at least ten more of his posts could be nominated easily...
 
I really can't believe that seemingly intelligent human beings really believe that we went to the moon, the Van Allen belt would make that an impossibility in itself.

There is so much evidence out there that debunks that silly theory that its obvious that we never went near the moon.

Or do you all also think that our Government would never tell us a lie?
Click to expand...

Bad education, poor research skills, and non sequitur.

We've got a good horse, here.
 
Damien Evans said:
I nominate this post from our good friends over at BAUT:


This is from this thread, and probably isn't even his best one, you should really check it out for some gut bustingly stupid CT reasoning, at least ten more of his posts could be nominated easily...
Click to expand...


This quote of his is better! (same thread, farther down)

joshuatree said:
The fact that I do understand the "science and technology" is exactly why I don't buy the official conspiracy theory put forth by nasa and nuts like you.
Click to expand...
 
Yeah, sure.

The first time I learned of the moon hoax CT, I remember seeing a picture of the LM descending, with black crosshairs all over the picture.

Somehow, these nuts think that the crosshairs were hand-painted.

Anyway, the site claimed that one of the crosshairs, over the LM, was forgotten.

The funny thing was, by looking closely I could actually see it.

And this guy's been "researching" the subject ???
 
This one is another "bouncy plane" guy.

Factfinder General@Du said:
No 767 has done anything remotely similar to what allegedly happened on 9/11
A 767 traveling at 500mph is going to pack a punch. I'm not saying it won't do damage, heck, it would probably knock some buildings keen over, but what I'm saying is implausible is that it would penetrate the building completely and then explode once inside. Aluminum Planes fail at point of impact. always!!!!
Click to expand...

So it's powerful enough to knock a building over, but not powerful enough to go through the outer wall. Hmmm...
 
Damien Evans said:
I nominate this post from our good friends over at BAUT:

This is from this thread, and probably isn't even his best one, you should really check it out for some gut bustingly stupid CT reasoning, at least ten more of his posts could be nominated easily...
Click to expand...
That reminds me of papageno's sig at apollohoax.net:

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]
who: "Required: One credible and reputable astrophysicist who will prove, in a peer-reviewed document, that a man can go through the Van Allen Radiation Belt unscathed. Anyone know of one?"

JayUtah: "Yes, Dr. James Van Allen. He has specifically repudiated the hoax theory."

who: "Maybe i should have been more clear. Apart from Allen..."[/FONT]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom