Moderated The NYPD and Molten Concrete

yankee451 said:
The police created a museum exhibit that claimed the fires were so intense the concrete melted, then cooled back into concrete, encasing guns that should have meen melted by the molten concrete they were incased in.


Single question opinion poll:

Were the police incompetent or lying?
Click to expand...

How many cops have you met that were experts in the physical sciences?
"incompetent" nice how you pick such a derogatory term. No surprise there. Unqualified to make such a statement...absolutely. But that happens in all walks of life - Richard Gage for example, Stephen Jones, Charlie Sheen, etc. etc. etc.
 
yankee451 said:
The police created a museum exhibit that claimed the fires were so intense the concrete melted, then cooled back into concrete, encasing guns that should have meen melted by the molten concrete they were incased in.


Single question opinion poll:

Were the police incompetent or lying?
Click to expand...

Both!

And it proves that 9/11 was a government conspiracy!

Good work, yank! You should submit your findings to all the news networks so we can expose GWB once and for all!
 
Sabretooth said:
Both!

And it proves that 9/11 was a government conspiracy!

Good work, yank! You should submit your findings to all the news networks so we can expose GWB once and for all!
Click to expand...

So you think the police are both lying and incompetent.

What about the networks you refer to - the ones that broadcast the cartoon jets. Incompetent or lying?
 
Anyone willing to seriously answer the question or are personal attacks and sarcasm all I can expect?

The police claimed the fires were so intense the concrete melted. They even built a museum exhibit to display their unscientific conclusions.

Were they incompetent or lying?
 
yankee451 said:
So you think the police are both lying and incompetent.
Click to expand...
Sure do!

What about the networks you refer to - the ones that broadcast the cartoon jets. Incompetent or lying?
Click to expand...
Naw. The MSM have obviously been run by the Zionistic government since WWII. They don't know any better, they just love a good story, for ratings, ya know!

Seriously, you should send your findings to them. I'm sure they would run with the info as a way to show the public how much of a tool GWB really was. Heck, the proof might be enough to get an indictment!

I mean, this was an obvious home grown attack so GWB could declare marshal law. Hell, he got the whole country to ground the planes for almost a week! But he didn't sweep up all the details properly so he could finish his plan. He belongs in jail for the rest of his life!
 
Sabretooth said:
Sure do!


Naw. The MSM have obviously been run by the Zionistic government since WWII. They don't know any better, they just love a good story, for ratings, ya know!

Seriously, you should send your findings to them. I'm sure they would run with the info as a way to show the public how much of a tool GWB really was. Heck, the proof might be enough to get an indictment!

I mean, this was an obvious home grown attack so GWB could declare marshal law. Hell, he got the whole country to ground the planes for almost a week! But he didn't sweep up all the details properly so he could finish his plan. He belongs in jail for the rest of his life!
Click to expand...

Sarcasm. see ya.
 
No one?

Were the police incompetent or lying when they claimed the fires were so hot the concrete melted?

What else were they incompetent or lying about?

Anyone?
 
yankee451 said:
Anyone willing to seriously answer the question or are personal attacks and sarcasm all I can expect?

The police claimed the fires were so intense the concrete melted. They even built a museum exhibit to display their unscientific conclusions.

Were they incompetent or lying?
Click to expand...

Whoever wrote that notice didn't know what they were talking about. The gun did not end up encased in resolidified molten concrete, as the concrete never melted in the first place. This has been explained previously.

But, hey, people get careless.
 
GlennB said:
Whoever wrote that notice didn't know what they were talking about. The gun did not end up encased in resolidified molten concrete, as the concrete never melted in the first place. This has been explained previously.

But, hey, people get careless.
Click to expand...

It was "careless" to build a museum exhibit based on bogus science, thanks to which whole generations of humans still believe the fires were so hot the concrete melted?

Considering we went to war over this stuff, and the police also supplied most of the evidence of plane parts, it's also careless to "hand-waive" such carelessness.
 
yankee451 said:
It was "careless" to build a museum exhibit based on bogus science, thanks to which whole generations of humans still believe the fires were so hot the concrete melted?

Considering we went to war over this stuff, and the police also supplied most of the evidence of plane parts, it's also careless to "hand-waive" such carelessness.
Click to expand...
:crazy:
 
yankee451 said:
They were not just wrong about something so fundamentally bogus as the claim that the fires were so intense the concrete "melted" and then cooled back into concrete, they created a museum exhibit! School children at the time who are now adults STILL BELIEVE THE FIRES WERE SO INTENSE THE CONCRETE MELTED!
My sincere question to you is simple.

Were they incompetent or lying?
Click to expand...

There are also some completely retarded idiots who think military ordinance that didn't exist were involved.

are they incompetent or lying?
 
NoahFence said:
There are also some completely retarded idiots who think military ordinance that didn't exist were involved.

are they incompetent or lying?
Click to expand...

Ridicule, avoiding questions, ignoring the evidence - nice talking to you.
 
 
Last edited:
yankee451 said:
The police created a museum exhibit that claimed the fires were so intense the concrete melted, then cooled back into concrete, encasing guns that should have meen melted by the molten concrete they were incased in.


Single question opinion poll:

Were the police incompetent or lying?
Click to expand...

While I'm sure he could easily tell the difference between a Glock and a Browning pistol, the curator of the police museum is/was not competent to tell if concrete "melted" or not. This demonstrates the dangers of venturing beyond one's field of competence. (Hint, hint - know thyself, Yankee). :D

It was "careless" to build a museum exhibit based on bogus science, thanks to which whole generations of humans still believe the fires were so hot the concrete melted?

Considering we went to war over this stuff, and the police also supplied most of the evidence of plane parts, it's also careless to "hand-waive" such carelessness.
Click to expand...

The U.S. didn't go to war over whether or not there was melted concrete in the police museum display, any more than whether or not the notorious "WTC Meteorite" had "melted steel" in it. (It didn't.) Whether or not the U.S. had casus belli under international law is another manner.
 

Attachments

  • WTC ''Meteorite''.jpg
    WTC ''Meteorite''.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 4
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom