Moderated The NYPD and Molten Concrete

You steal from babies?

why not? he pisses and ***** on over 3000 dead on 9/11 and then tries to wrap himself in the flag. Stealing from babies is about all he is able to do correctly.
 
"Fire temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava"?

:cool:

Simile. Add simile the list with math, physics, science and any skill required to understand 911.

What was the purpose of the thread beside your hate of police, firefighters, and humanity in general?

it's your time to spend as you choose.

What was your point? So far your posts expose your hate of FDNY, and police. Was there a point beside you might have problems with simile?

What is your fantasy on the melted concrete. Does it look melted? That is a simile. You are at a skeptic forum, I am skeptical about your purpose for this thread. Is there a purpose, a subject beside hate, and bias against science? Or is this a standard "la, la, la, la" I can't hear you open-loop posing spree?
 
Last edited:
"Fire temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava"?

:cool:

Earlier, you mentioned "lab results" and "science" with regard to that "concrete melted like lava".

Several of us have asked you where those lab results, where that science is.

You haven't answered yet.
Seems like there are no lab results.
Seems like you don't have any science to refer to.
 
Earlier, you mentioned "lab results" and "science" with regard to that "concrete melted like lava".

Several of us have asked you where those lab results, where that science is.

You haven't answered yet.
Seems like there are no lab results.
Seems like you don't have any science to refer to.

Golly I don't know. Certainly they're out there if the police were confident enough to construct a museum exhibit saying as much, but the problem is they didn't stop there. Their exhibit also stated after it cooled down it turned back into concrete, which is provably impossible so I'm pretty sure those lab results will never be found.

So are we clear that the fires weren't hot enough to melt concrete yet?
 
Last edited:
Thank you, yankee451, for reminding me why I stopped reading the 9/11 subforum...

The stupid is never going to stop.
 
Most likely, pulverized concrete and glass were sintered around the gun. The fires were hot enough to do this.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Golly I don't know. Certainly they're out there if the police were confident enough to construct a museum exhibit saying as much, but the problem is they didn't stop there. Their exhibit also stated after it cooled down it turned back into concrete, which is provably impossible so I'm pretty sure those lab results will never be found.
Ah so you say they are wrong, and your assumption that they based this museum exhibit caption on science is also wrong.

So are we clear that the fires weren't hot enough to melt concrete yet?
Yep.
No one ever disputed this here.
 
Golly I don't know. Certainly they're out there if the police were confident enough to construct a museum exhibit saying as much, but the problem is they didn't stop there. Their exhibit also stated after it cooled down it turned back into concrete, which is provably impossible so I'm pretty sure those lab results will never be found.

So are we clear that the fires weren't hot enough to melt concrete yet?

The fires were not hot enough to melt concrete. The WTC collapse was enough to make things look like concrete melted, to someone who labeled a museum item. Which means? Nothing.

You have expose your hate for police and firefighters. What is your point, everyone knows the fires were not hot enough to melt steel, and there was no thermite. What is your fantasy on this one? Missiles? What?
 
The fires were not hot enough to melt concrete. The WTC collapse was enough to make things look like concrete melted, to someone who labeled a museum item. Which means? Nothing.

You have expose your hate for police and firefighters. What is your point, everyone knows the fires were not hot enough to melt steel, and there was no thermite. What is your fantasy on this one? Missiles? What?
Mayhaps a giant flying magnifier that concentrated the energy from the sun!!!!!!!!!:D:jaw-dropp:D:jaw-dropp
 
Does that mean you think the fires were hot enough to melt concrete or not?

He probably thinks that the only thing to burn hot enough to melt the WTC concrete is teh stupid...
 
Last edited:
Golly I don't know. Certainly they're out there if the police were confident enough to construct a museum exhibit saying as much, but the problem is they didn't stop there. Their exhibit also stated after it cooled down it turned back into concrete, which is provably impossible so I'm pretty sure those lab results will never be found.

So are we clear that the fires weren't hot enough to melt concrete yet?

No lab analysis, and I don't have as much faith in the police as you do. OP dismissed as strawman.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom