Dr. MAS said:
Note, not the evidence's decision is final, just the committee's.
*************************************************
Only in case of confliction.
WHAT "confliction" are you expecting? Facts are facts, or does your committee wish to "conflict" when demonstrated facts are presented?
Dr. MAS said:
.in which a full PhD thesis has to be compiled, written, reviewed, and sent to you in Pakistan. How serious ARE you about this? Not very, it seems...
**************************************
Time is for registeration and not for submission of thesis.
It doesn't say that anywhere in your rules. And even if it did, it STILL only allows one month to apply for the prize. If you are so sure of yourselves, why not make it a permanent prize with NO time limits? I'd say it's because you simply want the
appearance of a challenge without actually allowing anyone scientific to apply.
Dr. MAS said:
So you expect the applicants to submit a full PhD thesis for examination? With the completely irrelevant and stupidly impossible endorsement requirement? This is simply a very VERY childish escape-clause, isn't it.
******************************************
I don't think so there is some problem. If you have then write to me. I will change rules for you. so that you may easily win prize money.
For each registered user the rules will be different. Get registeration with national identity card copy and discuss rules for winning the prize. We will facilitate you as much as we can.
If you feel, this rule is irrelevent, you can discuss after getting registeration. our committee is ready to accept.
I have just written to you in this thread. But if it wasn't clear, here it is again: MAKE YOUR CHALLENGE PROPERLY SCIENTIFIC IF YOU WANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY!
And it's not about how easily I win the money, it's how valid the competition is. If I do apply and win (as if

), I won't be taking your money. Instead, I will donate it to an allopathic hospital in Islamabad - the statistics say they will need it.
Dr. MAS said:
What this has to do with acceptance or judging no-one can tell, except to allow your the chance to exclude people on their name or level of education - how convenient... And what ID number might that be? I have no "academic ID number" that is recognised world-wide, so does that mean I am excluded from your challenge? If so, that's both highly exclusionary AND cheating.
********************************************
This has nothing to do with challenge basic preliminary criteria but necessary for our record. Any body can get registeration but with complete acamdemic, professional and occupational status. The national Identity card copy is necessary.
Again I ask, what has anyone's "complete acamdemic(?), professional and occupational status" got to do with this? Scientific facts are scientific facts, even if they are provided by an unschooled sheep-herder. Or is your committee going to exclude people on this basis...? Sure looks like it!
And as has been pointed out by others, a "national identity card" is not a world-wide system - we do NOT have one here in Australia, so what do you think I should use instead, please?