Dr. MAS said:
Homeoman,
He is saying right because when you got registeration it was open and when he visited it was closed.
He supposes so many things without actually experimenting.
Do not be so sure of yourself.
I tried a number of times over a number of weeks (at least once per day) to access your forum in the hope of finding coherent details of your challenge. This is because the information you talk about is certainly not available on the NCH website or anywhere prominent. I gave up after there weeks because your forum demanded I register BEFORE it would let me read anything at all, which meant you were simply hiding your challenge out of the public eye.
Now that there is no registration required, that has improved things a little bit, but not a lot. Still your challenge is NOT in the public eye but hidden on a discussion forum. And it does not appear to be particularly well organised either - is there a clear statement of what the challenger has to do? An application form? No...
Having read the rules you set out, I can only conclude that you and/or your group have no intention of making this a fair challenge at all. Let's just go through your rules and see why:
1. First send request letter at my clinic with your complete introduction and academic qualification. Your ID number is must.
What this has to do with acceptance or judging no-one can tell, except to allow your the chance to exclude people on their name or level of education - how convenient... And what ID number might that be? I have no "academic ID number" that is recognised world-wide, so does that mean I am excluded from your challenge? If so, that's both highly exclusionary AND cheating.
2. Send your thesis endorse with three Ph.D's Doctors from three different Universities with complete postal address and national ID numbers.
So you expect the applicants to submit a full PhD thesis for examination? With the completely irrelevant and stupidly impossible endorsement requirement? This is simply a very VERY childish escape-clause, isn't it.
3. Our prize committee comprises of Ph.D doctors will examine your thesis. If the committee recommend and approved your study, you can win one million rupees.
Ah! I see! This is called "stacking the deck", and is one of the most serious breaches of properly managed challenges. This alone says that you are so NOT serious that it IS a joke. If you had any integrity, you would at least relegate this task to a COMPLETELY INDEPENDANT examination committee, agreed by both yourself and the applicant(s).
Furthermore, this is where we find the actual "challenge" required to win your prize - convince a totally partisan committee! Not "provide proof", or "demonstrate with clear statistics", nothing actually
scientific! If you were actually serious about this, you would propose some protocol where subjective judgement is not necessary - the results would be obvious to everyone. That you do not says a lot about your understanding of scientific research.
4. This offer is valid for one month from 1st may 2005.
...in which a full PhD thesis has to be compiled, written, reviewed, and sent to you in Pakistan. How serious ARE you about this? Not very, it seems...
5. Committee decision is final.
Note, not the
evidence's decision is final, just the committee's.
Look, the JREF challenge stands in public, it is there ad infinitum, it is a real US$1,000,000, and the rules are simple and clear about non-judgemental results. In no way does your "Million Rupee Offer" even come close to comparing to this, and it's even further from being scientific.
Are you SURE you have a PhD in something?