How the Shanksville Crater Was Made

[yankee451]

So, two pyrex spheres striking from the inside-out?

Or two missiles striking from the outside-in?

 

[yankee451]

Yup. Handwaved sometime ago, IIRC.

By you fine folk - no one responded to my repeated references.

Pity.

 

[yankee451]

Here we are at 20 + pages of garbage. Has anyone mentioned flight 1771?



This dude is nothing but a Killtown wanna be

Pffft!

Killtown can only wish.

 

[TheRedWorm]

What is your standard of evidence? What could theoretically make you admit that you are wrong?

 

[leftysergeant]

I'm impressed by credentials but I'm not trying to put down anyone, in fact I'm trying very hard not to.

Caspian flight 7908

[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Caspian-7908.png[/qimg]

thank you for bringing that up. Even in your picture, it is clear to see that the down-range lip is raised, with no debris of any significance up-range, plenty on the down-range side. The crater did not cave in because it is in clay and mud stone.

 

[TJM]

By you fine folk - no one responded to my repeated references.

Pity.

Ah. I haven't been following along that closely of late. Which references?

 

[leftysergeant]

Don't you want to corect my spelling or sometlhing?

We're too busy dealing with your false statements and delusions.

 

[beachnut]

Evidence for Predisposition of Fantasy

So, two pyrex spheres striking from the inside-out?

http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/inside-out.png

Or two missiles striking from the outside-in?

[URL="http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/detonated_undetonated.png"]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/detonated_undetonated.png[/URL]

Wow, the science you used is the Pyrex balls, but then you take your science, and go backwards. Logic in action.

Pyrex craters? lol
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/...GH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf

Logic?
Like your HAARP fantasy, your missile fantasy is supported only in your mind.

Well - I know they'd love to be able to control the weather, and I think the ability to direct hurricanes goes back to simple cloud-seeding, but the trick is in discerning how much of what they claim is true and how much is B.S. I think there's plenty of evidence that they have the capabilities - HAARP is a good example, but it's still just a microwave. Microwaves came out of WWII - it is real technology that has been used in the ruse of other false technologies.

And "they" used two JASSM missiles? Is There no fantasy or lie too outrageous for you to disrespect the murdered Passengers on Flight 93?

 

[yankee451]

Anyone? Anything about the thread? Any more complaints about the measurements?

Anyone want to explain better than I have how a 757 can disappear into the ground?

Has any other high speed crash disappeared like this?

No?

Better attack the messenger.

 

[leftysergeant]

How does this work in Randi world anyway? No credentials means no credibility right? So let's say you're all correct - I'm as dumb as a box of rocks, but it doesn't make me wrong, and if you can't prove this box of rocks wrong, what does that say about you?

Relevant education or life experience will suffice.

 

[chris lz]

Yankee,

I looked at your measurements and they seem a reasonable 1st guess. But what isn't clear in the crater photo is exactly where the wing prints end. It's very fuzzy, and as I recall, there is a color difference in the outer wing-print that many confuse with the end of the wingspan.

Are you familiar with Northwest flight 710, whose entire fuselage vanished under a similar type of impact crater? Investigators had never seen anything like it before.

 

[leftysergeant]

Anyone? Anything about the thread? Any more complaints about the measurements?

Anyone want to explain better than I have how a 757 can disappear into the ground?

Has any other high speed crash disappeared like this?

No?

Better attack the messenger.

Did you Google Paul Klipsch and Spitfire like I suggested?

 

[TheRedWorm]

What is your standard of evidence? What could theoretically make you admit that you are wrong?

This isn't attacking the messenger, it is asking a question. Please answer it.

 

[leftysergeant]

Oh good. An expert.

Actually, he is. He's a docket scientist. Who are you?

 

[leftysergeant]

Demonstrate how the jet caused the crater, or demonstate how the missiles did not.

Capiche?

Thecrater is airplane-shaped and contains aircraft parts. Now, if you have another theory, you have to prove it.

 

[chris lz]

As someone else mentioned a few pages ago, I too have always been curious why flight 93 was even necessary. Targeting blades of grass in the middle of nowhere seems a bizarre and gratuitous afterthought. Is this the first time in history a false flag operation thought it important to blow up a useless, empty field? By 9:40am the fate of almost 3,000 people was already sealed. How would subsequent history be different had there been no Flight 93 plot? Had there been no dead grass?

Just curious

 

[leftysergeant]

When have you done aught else.

The crater is very similar to NASA photographs of projectiles striking at trajectories of less than ten degrees.

True or false?

Answer the question.

False. Try again.

 

[leftysergeant]

If the debris was not visible from the air, and the 'official' story has it most of it was dug out of the ground, could they not simply take photos of a backhoe dropping debris into the hole and claim they were digging it out?

I repeat to all of you, R. Mackey included and anyone else who cares or doesnt:

if my proofs require 'math' to prove, so do yours. Without the math proving a 757 caused the crater you are in NO position to claim anything.

Are we agreed?

No. The crarter was airplane-shaped and contained airpplane parts. Airplanes have been known to dig into the ground on impact. It is an airplane crash site.

Bombs through ejecta in all directions. All the ejecta from FLT 93 are sown range. It is not an explosive crater.

No math needed.

 

[Kid Eager]

Anyone? Anything about the thread? Any more complaints about the measurements?

Anyone want to explain better than I have how a 757 can disappear into the ground?

Has any other high speed crash disappeared like this?

No?

Better attack the messenger.

I guess when the law and the facts are against you, all that's left is banging the table. The faux martyrdom is a nice touch...

 

[leftysergeant]

Because the argument is compelling.

No.