How the Shanksville Crater Was Made

[yankee451]

This video demonstrates how crusie missiles striking at trajectories of less than ten degrees from horizontal caused the gash at Shanksville.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQTNy6Jb26A&feature=player_embedded

In the below screenshot from Google Earth, the dotted red line roughly matches Susan McElwain's location and her description of the direction of travel of the “small white plane”, with that of the left side of the gash. I believe the left side of the gash would have struck first, and would not have detonated. These missiles can be used as “aerostable slugs”, which I interpret as “they don’t need to detonate”.
...

Edited by LashL: 

Snipped for compliance with Rule 4. Do not copy and paste lengthy tracts of text/articles from elsewhere. Instead, cite a short passage and provide a link to the source.

 

[Starving for Truth]

Looks like a meteorite/nucular crater. Not a plane.

 

[Lenbrazil]

LOL was that a joke? Several witnesses saw the plane crash and several ATCs saw it disappear from radar. 90% of a 757 was pulled from the hole.

OTIH No one saw or tracked cruise missiles hitting the crater and no missile debris was found in it.

 

[yankee451]

LOL was that a joke? Several witnesses saw the plane crash and several ATCs saw it disappear from radar. 90% of a 757 was pulled from the hole.

OTIH No one saw or tracked cruise missiles hitting the crater and no missile debris was found in it.

Interesting story, however unlike you I have supplied evidence to support my conclusion. If the Shanksville crater is more consistent with a jet crash than two cruise missiles striking in crossfire, now's the time to make your case.

 

[Horatius]

As for the burned trees, I speculate they actually launched at least three JASSMs, but that the first one struck a tree and went off course, and was remotely self-destructed to cover up their tracks,

Okay, so they launched three missiles, but only two reached their intended target. So then, why does the crater look like it's supposed to look? Either the third missile had no purpose, and should not have been used, or the scene created should be incomplete in some way.

 

[yankee451]

Looks like a meteorite/nucular crater. Not a plane.

Good eye.

In the video I use NASA's photos and calculations for oblique meteorite impacts to estimate the trajectory of the gashes.

 

[yankee451]

Okay, so they launched three missiles, but only two reached their intended target. So then, why does the crater look like it's supposed to look? Either the third missile had no purpose, and should not have been used, or the scene created should be incomplete in some way.

Or they're just as fallible as the next guy and a missile hit a tree.

I have explained in the video that the crater doesn't look like "its supposed to look" - it looks nothing like a jet crash, but by using NASA's photographs and figures of oblique meteorite impacts it can be discovered what it DOES look like.

 

[Mark F]

We also know the "small white jet" was a private Dassault Falcon directed by ATC to get eyes on the site. It was not a missile.

This is another fantastic example of starting with the conclusion, then working the evidence to fit, ignoring that which doesn't, distorting what you need to and fabricating the rest.

 

[tsig]

Or they're just as fallible as the next guy and a missile hit a tree.

I have explained in the video that the crater doesn't look like "its supposed to look" - it looks nothing like a jet crash, but by using NASA's photographs and figures of oblique meteorite impacts it can be discovered what it DOES look like.

Of course it looks just like it's supposed to look, I should know since I decided how it was supposed to look.

 

[GlennB]

Edited by kmortis: 

Removed previously moderated content

yankee451, the area was strewn with human and commercial aircraft remains.

People saw the plane fly in, and it was tracked on its way.

 

[tsig]

We also know the "small white jet" was a private Dassault Falcon directed by ATC to get eyes on the site. It was not a missile.

This is another fantastic example of starting with the conclusion, then working the evidence to fit, ignoring that which doesn't, distorting what you need to and fabricating the rest.

Why would ATC want eyes on the site except to help guide the missiles in/tuther off

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

I have explained in the video that the crater doesn't look like "its supposed to look" - it looks nothing like a jet crash, but by using NASA's photographs and figures of oblique meteorite impacts it can be discovered what it DOES look like.

The same NASA that you don't believe put men on the moon?

Why trust their photographs then?

 

[Horatius]

Or they're just as fallible as the next guy and a missile hit a tree.

I have explained in the video that the crater doesn't look like "its supposed to look" - it looks nothing like a jet crash, but by using NASA's photographs and figures of oblique meteorite impacts it can be discovered what it DOES look like.

I understand that you think "it looks nothing like a jet crash", my point is, it looks like what the NWO thought people (other than you, of course!) would think the jet crash should look like - one large central crater for the body, and two elongated gashes for the wings, centered on the body.

What part of the Faked Plane Crash was the third missile intended to fake, albeit in a manner that clearly wouldn't fool one such as yourself? Was there another wing there, somewhere? Two bodies? What? What would the purpose of the third missile have been, for the NWO, if they were trying to create a fake crater intended to fool the sheeple?

 

[yankee451]

No questions about the evidence? Pity.

 

[Mudcat]

No questions about the evidence? Pity.

Okay... What about the fact that this is not the first air crash remotely like this? There have been several where the aircraft practically buried itself, leaving a crater. They left behind carnage that looked not unlike a missile strike and very little that could be identified as an aircraft.

So why must this be a missile strike?

 

[BStrong]

School's always out somewhere, I guess.

A nuke? really?

 

[BStrong]

Okay... What about the fact that this is not the first air crash remotely like this? There have been several where the aircraft practically buried itself, leaving a crater. They left behind carnage that looked not unlike a missile strike and very little that could be identified as an aircraft.

So why must this be a missile strike?

That 52 that went down at an airshow where the pilot attempted a maneuver beyond the aircraft's abilities comes to mind immediately.

 

[LSSBB]

No questions about the evidence? Pity.

What evidence? I did not see any evidence provided to prove your theory. Looks to all the evidence that a plane crashed there. Find any missile parts? Evidence of missing missile inventory? Witness claims that positively ID a missile? Radar? Confessions?

 

[SUSpilot]

That 52 that went down at an airshow where the pilot attempted a maneuver beyond the aircraft's abilities comes to mind immediately.

Another one that comes immediately to mind is the Payne Stewart crash.

 

[fitzgibbon]

Not to mention the Air Florida DC-9 that piled it in into the Everglades

Fitz