How the Shanksville Crater Was Made

Status
Not open for further replies.
dafydd said:
Jetsam, lol. You can't make this stuff up.
Click to expand...

I come here to be corrected. I see you're the grammar police. You've been more wrong than right so far, but it's shot's on goal, eh?

You won't touch the evidence, it's all about shooting and shouting down the messenger isn't it?

Now would any of you like to discuss the evidence or are you content with such childish antics regarding such a serious subject?
 
yankee451 said:
I come here to be corrected.
Click to expand...

If that is the case then why do you hand wave away all the evidence shown you? You have not presented any evidence yet, nor any maths or physics to back up your 911 fantasy.
 
Last edited:
cjnewson88 said:
In other words - "I have absolutely no evidence at all which proves my hypothesis, but I'm still running with it because its my own theory and therefore cannot possibly be in error"...
Click to expand...

These types always put me in mind of a Monty Python skit in which the speaker goes on at length about her "theory, the theory that is mine".

So far we have a contention with absolutely no evidence that this type of weapon existed in 2001, that this type of weapon could create the size/shape of crater seen in Shakesville, or that there was any physical evidence at the site that this weapon was used.
But since he thought of it , it must be true.:D
 
dafydd said:
If that is the case then why do you hand wave away all the evidence shown you? You have not presented any evidence yet, nor any maths or physics to back up your 911 fantasy.
Click to expand...

You have only managed to correct my language usage and typing skills, which I do appreciate. I hate using the wrong words and I do type too fast some times, much obliged for pointing it out.

You may have missed my repeated answers to MANY questions, so be specific, but be sure it hasn't been answered before or like beachnut, I will ignore it.
 
jaydeehess said:
These types always put me in mind of a Monty Python skit in which the speaker goes on at length about her "theory, the theory that is mine".

So far we have a contention with absolutely no evidence that this type of weapon existed in 2001, that this type of weapon could create the size/shape of crater seen in Shakesville, or that there was any physical evidence at the site that this weapon was used.
But since he thought of it , it must be true.:D
Click to expand...

What you're saying is you're all smarter than I am so it can't be true, or someone else would have thought of it.

You don't think military folks from every nation didn't recognize the crater immediately?
 
yankee451 said:
You may have missed my repeated answers to MANY questions, so be specific, but be sure it hasn't been answered before or like beachnut, I will ignore it.
Click to expand...

What happened to the passengers and why was their DNA found? Is that specific enough?
 
yankee451 said:
What you're saying is you're all smarter than I am so it can't be true, or someone else would have thought of it.

You don't think military folks from every nation didn't recognize the crater immediately?
Click to expand...

It is a crater made by a 757. Tracked by RADAR in real time by FAA controllers. Ironically, you might be the only person on earth with the idiotic claim of missiles, which were not in production, did it.

And you base this on Pyrex balls, traveling 3800 mph into sand, at 4.75 degree. WOWZER

http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/111aStupidClaimsbynutson911_zpsc6226717.jpg

I got the paper... lol, you google up stuff, and make your fantasy dumber. You are the BASF of 911 truth. Your cult's motto: "We don't make the lies, we make the lies Dumber."
 
yankee451 said:
The planes only work by ignoring the physical evidence, which is what I examined to lead me to the missiles. .
Click to expand...

You mean physical evidence like DNA identified body parts and code identified plane parts including the black box?

That physical evidence?
 
Let me get this right. Yankee is dodging all the hard questions and claiming he has answered them, therefore can now ignore them.. when in fact he has dodged/hand waved every single hard question but still claims victory?

Yankee, I have to ask. How the **** does your severely impaired mind work??? Stop hand waving, provide answers. You are yet to prove a 757 did not create the impact hole. You are yet to disprove RADAR, FDR, DNA, witnesses, debris, or comment on the 4000 people who worked the site for weeks to excavate and sort the debris/human remains. You have yet to contact anyone who was involved with UA93. You have yet to get clued up on anything to do with aviation, physics, aerodynamics, or air crash investigation.

11 pages and you have not proved or disproved anything
 
dafydd said:
What happened to the passengers and why was their DNA found? Is that specific enough?
Click to expand...

Prove to me there was DNA found and show me the control groups and methodology they used to identify the dead. Prove it wasn't just propaganda put out by the people who lied about a jet creating the gash. Demanding proof from the most likely suspects is a pathetic reply, but that's all any of you have - well that and word usage, grammatical errors and typos.

Prove to me the crater was caused by a jet and THEN you can start talking about passengers. The physical evidence of the crash site does not indicate a jet crash, far from it. Until you can prove a jet caused the gash, everything else is 'alleged' and to speculate on whether the DNA story is true or false would be premature.

Unlike you and your jet, I have provided a better explanation for the crater, I have repeatedly shown the missiles were ready for production in 2000, they use decades old technology and god-knows the US military is missile-happy anyway, and best of all the physical evidence of the crater matches what two projectiles of about that size with explosives about that big striking in crossfire at 10 degree trajectories would probably look like.

The only thing missing is the math, which could prove me wrong, or prove me right. You could do the math to prove the plane did it, or at least to prove missiles didn't, but you choose to mock, ridicule and correct my spelling. That speaks volumes.
 
Last edited:
yankee451 said:
Prove to me there was DNA found and show me the control groups and methodology they used to identify the dead.
Click to expand...

The reports are out there. Do your own research. Thank you for the non-answer. You are making the missile claim, you must provide evidence for that. You haven't presented any yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom