• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories

[Continuation] Musk, SpaceX and future of Tesla II

i would argue there's no guarantee tesla would even be willing to do that at all if they weren't under the same ownership. gpus are in incredible demand now and even more at that time, the kind of capital project that kind of money is being spent on isn't something that they'd necessarily want to risk and i doubt nvidia would do that alone either.
They aren't under the same ownership. xAI is owned by Elon Musk. Tesla is a publicly traded company and Musk is only one minority shareholder.

This is a clear case of a man appropriating assets he didn't own for his own purposes.
 
They aren't under the same ownership. xAI is owned by Elon Musk. Tesla is a publicly traded company and Musk is only one minority shareholder.

This is a clear case of a man appropriating assets he didn't own for his own purposes.
you're right, i misspoke. although i think due to the way the board is structured at tesla it's not run as a public company typically would be and musk has a disproportionate amount of control relative to his ownership.
 
you're right, i misspoke. although i think due to the way the board is structured at tesla it's not run as a public company typically would be and musk has a disproportionate amount of control relative to his ownership.
I can't disagree with that. In any reasonable public company, Musk would have been fired as CEO some time ago. Unfortunately, the stock is overpriced mainly because of the Musk factor and even the rational shareholders won't fire him or his nepotistic board because they don't want to see the price readjust itself to a more rational level.
 
you're right, i misspoke. although i think due to the way the board is structured at tesla it's not run as a public company typically would be and musk has a disproportionate amount of control relative to his ownership.
Still theft though. Any proper board would have immediately canned Galaxy Brain and called in the rozzers over it.
 
I can't disagree with that. In any reasonable public company, Musk would have been fired as CEO some time ago. Unfortunately, the stock is overpriced mainly because of the Musk factor and even the rational shareholders won't fire him or his nepotistic board because they don't want to see the price readjust itself to a more rational level.
Yeah, it wouldn't have anything to do with Tesla's rise from a 2-bit outfit started by a consultant for AC Propulsion (current annual income ~$7 million) with ideas of making a boutique electric sports car in 2003, to a multinational company with 7 factories around the World producing the top selling car model of any kind in 2023. It also wouldn't have anything to do with Tesla growing its energy storage business by 360% in 2022 and 157% in 2023, expecting to account for ~20% of total income in upcoming periods. And it wouldn't have anything to do with the Cybertruck becoming profitable in October, doubling sales from the previous quarter and outselling its nearest rival the Ford F-150 Lightning by 230% (Ford just announced a 'pause' on the F-150 Lightning until January next year, probably to stop the bleeding as they lose $30,000 on every truck sold).

Or if that is the 'Musk factor' you are talking about, how does that make the stock overpriced? Unless somethig goes horribly wrong in the near future, I'm betting the current stock price will soon be looking quite undervalued. And with Musk now having the President's ear - as opposed to being constantly 'looked into' by the Biden adminstration - Tesla is likely to do even better in the next 4 years.
 
Yeah, it wouldn't have anything to do with Tesla's rise from a 2-bit outfit started by a consultant for AC Propulsion (current annual income ~$7 million) with ideas of making a boutique electric sports car in 2003, to a multinational company with 7 factories around the World producing the top selling car model of any kind in 2023. It also wouldn't have anything to do with Tesla growing its energy storage business by 360% in 2022 and 157% in 2023, expecting to account for ~20% of total income in upcoming periods. And it wouldn't have anything to do with the Cybertruck becoming profitable in October, doubling sales from the previous quarter and outselling its nearest rival the Ford F-150 Lightning by 230% (Ford just announced a 'pause' on the F-150 Lightning until January next year, probably to stop the bleeding as they lose $30,000 on every truck sold).

Or if that is the 'Musk factor' you are talking about, how does that make the stock overpriced? Unless somethig goes horribly wrong in the near future, I'm betting the current stock price will soon be looking quite undervalued. And with Musk now having the President's ear - as opposed to being constantly 'looked into' by the Biden adminstration - Tesla is likely to do even better in the next 4 years.
You know as well as I do that everything you said was done despite Galaxy Brain. Why are you still simping for him?
 
Yeah, it wouldn't have anything to do with Tesla's rise from a 2-bit outfit started by a consultant for AC Propulsion (current annual income ~$7 million) with ideas of making a boutique electric sports car in 2003, to a multinational company with 7 factories around the World producing the top selling car model of any kind in 2023. It also wouldn't have anything to do with Tesla growing its energy storage business by 360% in 2022 and 157% in 2023, expecting to account for ~20% of total income in upcoming periods. And it wouldn't have anything to do with the Cybertruck becoming profitable in October, doubling sales from the previous quarter and outselling its nearest rival the Ford F-150 Lightning by 230% (Ford just announced a 'pause' on the F-150 Lightning until January next year, probably to stop the bleeding as they lose $30,000 on every truck sold).

Or if that is the 'Musk factor' you are talking about, how does that make the stock overpriced? Unless somethig goes horribly wrong in the near future, I'm betting the current stock price will soon be looking quite undervalued. And with Musk now having the President's ear - as opposed to being constantly 'looked into' by the Biden adminstration - Tesla is likely to do even better in the next 4 years.
Just look at the financials of Tesla and compare them to the financials of any other similar sized company and it becomes obvious that Tesla stock is over priced.
 
You know as well as I do that everything you said was done despite Galaxy Brain. Why are you still simping for him?
I don't agree. The Cybertruck was done because of Elon Musk. Then again, the Cybertruck is not really the success Roger is trying to paint. Yes it outsells other EV trucks but it's really ugly, has a load of technical issues, cost twice as much as Musk said it would and shorter range than Musk said it would. We are supposed to be impressed with the sales figures but Ford sold 100,000 trucks just in October. Tesla sold only 17,000 trucks in the whole third quarter and I'm supposed to be impressed, apparently.
 
He continued to play a computer game whilst getting an update on SpaceX. He plays the computer game so much he is a top 20 player in the world, unless he has found a way to cheat that takes, hours and hours of playing time. He plays it when acting as a CEO.
 
he also spends hours every day on social media

he founded/owns significant portions/has the title of ceo for several successful tech companies. there's not enough hours in a day for him to be heavily involved in all of those things. those are two facts.
 
I don't agree. The Cybertruck was done because of Elon Musk. Then again, the Cybertruck is not really the success Roger is trying to paint. Yes it outsells other EV trucks but...
But?

You say the Cybertruck is ugly, I say the Ford F-150 and Dodge RAM etc. are ugly. I'm glad Tesla didn't copy their horrible designs. As soon as I saw the Cybertruck I said Yes! that's what I want to see - real innovation - not just an electric motor shoved into a conventional truck. Only Tesla had the balls to do it, and it was Elon Musk who provided the impetus. Regarding the Cybertruck design he said "I want the future to look like the future. We’re not doing a traditional boring truck. We can always do that later. I want to build something that’s cool.".

But Musk didn't design the Cybertruck, Franz von Holzhausen did. He designed all the other Tesla models too, which many haters critcs also think are ugly or boring compared to other cars. Why? Mostly because they're Luddites, afraid of change and uncomfortable with innovation. This thinking fits the conservative mind, so you might think it would be mostly conservatives who hate the Cybertruck. But in this case there's another factor that has even more influence - tribalism. So-called liberals hate the Cybertruck because Musk is behind it, and being different was just another excuse to hate it. These people don't care about the technology or the design, only getting as many hate points as they can out of it.

We are supposed to be impressed with the sales figures but Ford sold 100,000 trucks just in October. Tesla sold only 17,000 trucks in the whole third quarter and I'm supposed to be impressed, apparently.
Of course you're not impressed. That would mean admitting that Tesla did something impressive, which won't do at all. You might want to shield your eyes from this next bit,

Kelly Blue Book registration data for 2024
periodFord F-150 LightningTesla Cybertruck
Q17,9022,803
Q27.7128,755
Q37,16216,692

What's remarkable about this is that - as you say - Ford sells a lot of trucks. Only a small percentage of them are EVs, so the potential for growth should be high. When Ford CEO Jim Farley unveiled the F-150 Lightning he promised it would be the top selling EV truck in the US, beating Tesla's Cybertruck 'if it ever appears'. For a while this was true because it took a while for Tesla to develop the Cybertruck, but that quickly changed once production started. As you can see (if you dare to look) from this year's numbers - sales of the F-150 Lightning are declining, while Cybertruck sales are growing exponentially. By Q2 it had already beaten Ford, and in the next quarter almost doubled sales again. Ford's response? They threw in the towel when the Cybertruck had barely been on the market for a year.

That's pretty impressive for a newcomer who had never produced a truck of any kind before. According to Jim Farley Ford 'knows' trucks and 'understands' its customers, so it should be the F-150 Lightning whose sales are going ballistic, not the 'ugly' Cybertruck. Now Ford is 'pausing' EV truck production and planning to make hybrids instead. According to Ford the market for EV trucks just isn't there - the market for Ford's EV trucks that is. It's almost like someone's stealing their sales - I wonder who?

That you aren't impressed by this development just shows how much bias has crept into your thinking. Since you don't recognize the cause of this bias I will spell it out for you - it's Musk. You don't like his political views, so you seek to 'cancel' him by dumping on Tesla.

But it goes further than that. When Musk first entered the spotlight some were describing him as a 'real life Tony Stark'. So-called skeptics (with 'brains the size of a planet') immediately jumped on this. "Musk's no genius", they cried. "I know, because I are one!". They then predicted that Tesla would surely fail due to Musk's stupidity. When that didn't happen and Tesla became the most valuable car company in the World, they admitted they were wrong doubled down on claims that he was an idiot who just happened to be 'falling up', as well as a conman and evil genius who brainwashes 'fanboys' into buying Teslas.

And not just in the US - according to them Musk also has millions under his spell in Europe, China, Australia and even little old New Zealand - where Tesla's Model 3 and Y outsold Ford's Mach-E by 2.75:1 so far this year - despite Ford dropping the price by NZ$50,000 (~US$30,000). All you hear from these people is a constant stream of negativity as they desperately try to spin everything they hear about Tesla to make it sound bad, like you have done here.
 
Does this 'really innovative' design work as a pickup truck should? They're boring in design and almost all look the same because that's the best for the purpose--cargo. Will the cybertruck fit a whole load of lumber in its trunk, similar to how a pickup could be loaded? Can it be used to help your friends move? Pretty and futuristic is worthless if it can't do the job.
 
Does this 'really innovative' design work as a pickup truck should? They're boring in design and almost all look the same because that's the best for the purpose--cargo. Will the cybertruck fit a whole load of lumber in its trunk, similar to how a pickup could be loaded? Can it be used to help your friends move? Pretty and futuristic is worthless if it can't do the job.
Just Asking Questions?

The Cybertruck has an overall length of 18.6 ft, 0.8 ft shorter than the Ford F-150 Lightning. Despite being shorter overall its 6 ft bed is 0.41 ft longer than the F-150. Width of the bed is practically the same at 4.25 ft vs 4.2 ft. Overall width of the Cybertruck with mirrors extended is practically the same too, at 7.9 ft vs the F-150's 8 ft. However the Cybertruck's payload capacity is significantly higher than the F-150 Lightning, at 2,500 lbs vs 1,656 lbs. This means the Cybertruck can carry a lot more with a roof rack, which is often used by tradespeople who need to carry longer items. Apart from Tesla's own roof rack crossbars there are a 'ton' of aftermarket options, ranging from basic crossbars that can cover the whole rear of the vehicle to fully enclosed canopies with a roof rack on top. Here's a video of a Cybertruck being loaded up with a big stack of timber plus rolls of insulation, presumably for a 'work' job.

I bet the Cybertruck would be much better for moving your friends's stuff than the trailer I bought for my brother to help me move house a few years ago. Anything you put in it has to be ciovered with a tarpaulin and securely tied down, which is a pain. The Cybertruck's tonneau makes keeping stuff secure (and out of sight) a breeze. Taller items can go the front where there's more room under the cover. You can get retractable tonneaus for the F-150 too, but they are usually flat so you can't use them with taller items.

I'm not saying that the Cybertruck is better than a conventional truck for everything, but I also don't think we should just stick to designs from the 1930's and not try variations that might work better for some use cases. I applaud Tesla for innovating in a market that is largely stuck in the past.

As for working 'as a pickup truck should', Wikipedia says:-
Once a work or farming tool with few creature comforts, in the 1950s, US consumers began purchasing pickups for lifestyle reasons, and by the 1990s, less than 15 percent of owners reported use in work as the pickup truck's primary purpose. In North America, the pickup is mostly used as a passenger car.
Tesla's mission is to 'accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy'. With more than 85% of truck owners using their vehicles primarily or solely as passenger cars, it makes sense for the Cybetruck to be designed more for 'lifestyle' and personal transportion use than just a 'work truck', especially since trucks are far more polluting than saloon cars. That's the market which needs to be adressed first. If the Cybertruck isn't enough of a 'work truck' for the other 15% it's not a big deal - as Musk said they can do a boring 'conventional' truck later.

Meanwile Tesla is getting experience with innovations such as 48 volt architecture, which reduces the amount of copper wire required to 1/4 for big weight and cost savings, drive by wire which makes for better handling and integration, and 'unconventional' construction techniques such as large castings and structural body panels. In many ways the Cybertruck is a testbed for new technologies. Some ideas may not work out as well as others, but that's what innovation is all about. It's how real progress is made, not sticking with a design from the 1930's because automakers are too afraid to try something new.
 
He is a top 20 Diablo IV player, he plays it when receiving an update from SpaceX employees, the report indicated how near to disaster the recent impressive catch-the-rocket test came. He does not stop playing when he takes this update. He is in fact concentrating on playing the game and recording an impressive tier 150 run, he was so impressed with his run that he uploaded it to show other players what an incredible player he is - and a top 20 player in Diablo IV is an incredible achievement, one that (unless he has found a way to cheat) takes literally hundreds and hundreds of hours to achieve. Even if you started as the "best player of computer games in the world" it still takes hundreds and hundreds of hours as you are dependent on "drops" of equipment and crafting elements which are semi-random. He also stated that he must concentrate 100% when playing on such a level. Again, he did not stop playing when he was being given an update from SpaceX employees. Whatever else he may be doing he is not paying attention to the running of SpaceX.
 
He also stated that he must concentrate 100% when playing on such a level. Again, he did not stop playing when he was being given an update from SpaceX employees. Whatever else he may be doing he is not paying attention to the running of SpaceX.
And that's a good thing, right? I mean, the general consensus is that Musk is an idiot who doesn't have a clue about space rockets or running a business, so the more he stays out of it and lets his employees run SpaceX the better, right? Right?

Oh my bad, nothing Musk does is ever right. No matter what it is, someone will always find a way to spin it into being bad. (y)
 
And that's a good thing, right? I mean, the general consensus is that Musk is an idiot who doesn't have a clue about space rockets or running a business, so the more he stays out of it and lets his employees run SpaceX the better, right? Right?

Oh my bad, nothing Musk does is ever right. No matter what it is, someone will always find a way to spin it into being bad. (y)
You can have a brain that can solve complex problems and still be practically stupid. One of the complex problems smart people can have it being completely self unaware and unable to accept that they can be wrong.

Musk repeatedly gets expectations of the capabilities of his genius wrong. The boring company has achieved little, We Robot was an exercise in putting lipstick on a pig. New sales for Cybertruck are poor. Musk retweets insane conspiracy theories that indicate an unhinged mind not rooted in reality.
 
Just Asking Questions because a housemate spotted a Cybertruck at a secondhand dealership and is considering it. The cab has to be large enough to comfortably fit him, the storage has to be big enough to bring home 20' boards and full sheets of plywood.
 
And that's a good thing, right? I mean, the general consensus is that Musk is an idiot who doesn't have a clue about space rockets or running a business, so the more he stays out of it and lets his employees run SpaceX the better, right? Right?

Oh my bad, nothing Musk does is ever right. No matter what it is, someone will always find a way to spin it into being bad. (y)
What a strange post.
 
That's pretty impressive for a newcomer who had never produced a truck of any kind before. According to Jim Farley Ford 'knows' trucks and 'understands' its customers, so it should be the F-150 Lightning whose sales are going ballistic, not the 'ugly' Cybertruck. Now Ford is 'pausing' EV truck production and planning to make hybrids instead. According to Ford the market for EV trucks just isn't there - the market for Ford's EV trucks that is. It's almost like
someone's stealing their sales - I wonder who?
I agree that the Cybertruck is doing fairly well and certainly much better than the F-150 Lightning, and that Ford is failing here with its electric vehicle. But your own evidence suggests that Cybertruck is not stealing Ford sales, because the F-150 Lightning sales aren't declining in proportion to the rise in Cybertruck sales.

I would suggest the more likely explanation is that there isn't much of a market for a conventional pickup that happens to be electric, and that Cybertruck is tapping into a market for people who want something different from a conventional pickup.
 
Just Asking Questions because a housemate spotted a Cybertruck at a secondhand dealership and is considering it. The cab has to be large enough to comfortably fit him, the storage has to be big enough to bring home 20' boards and full sheets of plywood.
If he tries to load plywood into the cybertruck, he'll need to leave the tailgate down and put a strap on it. What he actually wants is a truck with a full size bed.
 
If he tries to load plywood into the cybertruck, he'll need to leave the tailgate down and put a strap on it. What he actually wants is a truck with a full size bed.
Which is largely a thing of the past in the USA, where trucks from all makers are more for replacing the family sedan than they are about hauling cargo.
 
I agree that the Cybertruck is doing fairly well and certainly much better than the F-150 Lightning, and that Ford is failing here with its electric vehicle. But your own evidence suggests that Cybertruck is not stealing Ford sales, because the F-150 Lightning sales aren't declining in proportion to the rise in Cybertruck sales.

I would suggest the more likely explanation is that there isn't much of a market for a conventional pickup that happens to be electric, and that Cybertruck is tapping into a market for people who want something different from a conventional pickup.
The correlation isn't 1:1 and wouldn't be proof be even if it was, so you may be right there. However up to 85% of truck owners probably really want something different - which legacy auto isn't providing. That means Tesla has an opportunity to tap into a market that the old guys can't satisfy. And it seems like the Cybertruck is doing it. For that reason, making it look radically different was actually a genius move (not Musk's genius of course - galaxy brain never had an original idea in his life - or so I have been told).

When Steve Jobs revealed the iPhone in January 2007 everyone was aghast. "What, no buttons - are you mad? That featureless slab is so boring and ugly, and the price! Nobody's going to pay that much. Why can't you make a real smartphone like the Blackberry? A proper 'work' phone, not a silly tech toy for Apple fanboys? Jobs has really blown it this time!". Then sales started ramping up, and the old guys started panicking.

I'm not saying the Cybertruck will repeat the iPhone's success, in fact I'm surpised it's doing as well as it is. However there's no doubt that Musk's idea of a truck that's 'cool' is resonating (with those who aren't reflexively avioding Tesla because they don't like Musk's politics). The truth is, many people do buy trucks in part because they look 'cool'. But the Cybertruck doesn't just look like it came from the future, it is the future. There's more technical innovation in this truck than all the legacy automakers' offerings combined. So looking radically different is good, because you can tell just by looking that there's something special about it. Tesla could do that because they aren't a conventianal automaker, and Musk gave the team the freedom to do unconventional things with it that legacy auto wouldn't dare to do - though I wouldn't be surprised if they copy it.
 
He continued to play a computer game whilst getting an update on SpaceX. He plays the computer game so much he is a top 20 player in the world, unless he has found a way to cheat that takes, hours and hours of playing time. He plays it when acting as a CEO.
He hires somebody in the Phillippines or Cambodia to play for him. As I said before he revealed his l33t build a few months ago, and it was all garbagr tier stuff that was actually designed for different builds than his.

Man doesn't have the attention span for a time sink like D4.
 
Does this 'really innovative' design work as a pickup truck should? They're boring in design and almost all look the same because that's the best for the purpose--cargo. Will the cybertruck fit a whole load of lumber in its trunk, similar to how a pickup could be loaded? Can it be used to help your friends move? Pretty and futuristic is worthless if it can't do the job.
US pickups aren't actually designed to do the job of pickups, they're too big and their loading beds are too small. What they're designed for is penile replacement therapy for middle aged men.
 
But?

You say the Cybertruck is ugly, I say the Ford F-150 and Dodge RAM etc. are ugly. I'm glad Tesla didn't copy their horrible designs. As soon as I saw the Cybertruck I said Yes! that's what I want to see - real innovation - not just an electric motor shoved into a conventional truck. Only Tesla had the balls to do it, and it was Elon Musk who provided the impetus. Regarding the Cybertruck design he said "I want the future to look like the future. We’re not doing a traditional boring truck. We can always do that later. I want to build something that’s cool.".
He wanted the future to look like the future? How come he produced something that looks like it came out of Back to the Future (1985) or Bladerunner (1982). The Cybertruck looks like what people thought the future would look like forty years ago.

The design of the Cybertruck is objectively bad. It's too big, too heavy and too dangerous to other road users and pedestrians. Yes, these criticisms apply to many other trucks too, but Cybertruck seems to have taken these negative attributes to the next level.

But Musk didn't design the Cybertruck, Franz von Holzhausen did. He designed all the other Tesla models too, which many haters critcs also think are ugly or boring compared to other cars. Why? Mostly because they're Luddites, afraid of change and uncomfortable with innovation. This thinking fits the conservative mind, so you might think it would be mostly conservatives who hate the Cybertruck.
Actually, I think most of Tesla's other models look fine. I particularly like the S.


But in this case there's another factor that has even more influence - tribalism. So-called liberals hate the Cybertruck because Musk is behind it, and being different was just another excuse to hate it. These people don't care about the technology or the design, only getting as many hate points as they can out of it.


Of course you're not impressed. That would mean admitting that Tesla did something impressive, which won't do at all. You might want to shield your eyes from this next bit,

Kelly Blue Book registration data for 2024
periodFord F-150 LightningTesla Cybertruck
Q17,9022,803
Q27.7128,755
Q37,16216,692

What's remarkable about this is that - as you say - Ford sells a lot of trucks. Only a small percentage of them are EVs, so the potential for growth should be high. When Ford CEO Jim Farley unveiled the F-150 Lightning he promised it would be the top selling EV truck in the US, beating Tesla's Cybertruck 'if it ever appears'. For a while this was true because it took a while for Tesla to develop the Cybertruck, but that quickly changed once production started. As you can see (if you dare to look) from this year's numbers - sales of the F-150 Lightning are declining, while Cybertruck sales are growing exponentially. By Q2 it had already beaten Ford, and in the next quarter almost doubled sales again. Ford's response? They threw in the towel when the Cybertruck had barely been on the market for a year.

That's pretty impressive for a newcomer who had never produced a truck of any kind before. According to Jim Farley Ford 'knows' trucks and 'understands' its customers, so it should be the F-150 Lightning whose sales are going ballistic, not the 'ugly' Cybertruck. Now Ford is 'pausing' EV truck production and planning to make hybrids instead. According to Ford the market for EV trucks just isn't there - the market for Ford's EV trucks that is. It's almost like someone's stealing their sales - I wonder who?

That you aren't impressed by this development just shows how much bias has crept into your thinking. Since you don't recognize the cause of this bias I will spell it out for you - it's Musk. You don't like his political views, so you seek to 'cancel' him by dumping on Tesla.

But it goes further than that. When Musk first entered the spotlight some were describing him as a 'real life Tony Stark'. So-called skeptics (with 'brains the size of a planet') immediately jumped on this. "Musk's no genius", they cried. "I know, because I are one!". They then predicted that Tesla would surely fail due to Musk's stupidity. When that didn't happen and Tesla became the most valuable car company in the World, they admitted they were wrong doubled down on claims that he was an idiot who just happened to be 'falling up', as well as a conman and evil genius who brainwashes 'fanboys' into buying Teslas.

And not just in the US - according to them Musk also has millions under his spell in Europe, China, Australia and even little old New Zealand - where Tesla's Model 3 and Y outsold Ford's Mach-E by 2.75:1 so far this year - despite Ford dropping the price by NZ$50,000 (~US$30,000). All you hear from these people is a constant stream of negativity as they desperately try to spin everything they hear about Tesla to make it sound bad, like you have done here.
Yeah, whatever. Still, Ford sells more than five times as many trucks a month as Tesla sold in its best quarter.
 
So many posts on this thread, enumerating the Cybertrucks many faults. It's terrible, it's ugly, surely no one will buy it. And yet, it continues to be the best selling electric truck. It's almost as if people are biased by their dislike for Musk.
 
he's had original ideas they're just bad and the cybertruck looks gay
It's hard for someone who grew up in the 1960's to keep up with the latest vernacular. In my day something highly admired or exceptionally excellent was called "the cat's pajamas". Then I heard young people talking about stuff being 'cool', which seemed a bit weird but I got used to it. At my age I don't hang around with young people much so I haven't picked up on the words they are now using. Is 'gay' the new 'cool'? Or is being 'cool' now gay?

The reason I'm asking is that I'm trying to make sense of this article about the Cybertruck getting a 'golden steering wheel' award in Germany:-
The Tesla Cybertruck was deemed the “Coolest Car” at The Golden Steering Wheel 2024 awards from Bild am Sonntag and Auto Bild. The award was celebrated by the electric vehicle maker on social media...

What is quite interesting about the Cybertruck’s win at The Golden Steering Wheel 2024 awards is the fact that the all-electric pickup truck is not even sold in Europe today. Thus, it would appear that the “Coolest Car” award was given to the Cybertruck just because it is a legitimately cool vehicle.

This certainly seems to be the case, as Bild am Sonntag and Auto Bild gave the Cybertruck a squircle-shaped award, unlike its usual trophies, which are shaped like conventional steering wheels.
Oh silly me, it's the Germans. You know they are all gay, right? So when they say cool, it means gay. Which is OK I guess, because in my day 'gay' meant ‘cheerful’, ‘happy’, ‘merry’, or ‘lively’ - originating from the Old Germanic word 'gahi’ which meant ‘fast’ or ‘quick’ - and the Cybertruck certainly is that.
 
I assume Musk will take a big step back from all his companies to run "the Department of Government Efficiency".
It would be deeply unfair to the shareholders otherwise.
 
I assume Musk will take a big step back from all his companies to run "the Department of Government Efficiency".
It would be deeply unfair to the shareholders otherwise.
Season 7 of Diablo 4 is likely to start 21st January 2025, so Musk will have a couple of weeks to help Trump out before he needs to knuckle down and get some serious playing hours in.
 
It's hard for someone who grew up in the 1960's to keep up with the latest vernacular. In my day something highly admired or exceptionally excellent was called "the cat's pajamas". Then I heard young people talking about stuff being 'cool', which seemed a bit weird but I got used to it. At my age I don't hang around with young people much so I haven't picked up on the words they are now using. Is 'gay' the new 'cool'? Or is being 'cool' now gay?

The reason I'm asking is that I'm trying to make sense of this article about the Cybertruck getting a 'golden steering wheel' award in Germany:-

Oh silly me, it's the Germans. You know they are all gay, right? So when they say cool, it means gay. Which is OK I guess, because in my day 'gay' meant ‘cheerful’, ‘happy’, ‘merry’, or ‘lively’ - originating from the Old Germanic word 'gahi’ which meant ‘fast’ or ‘quick’ - and the Cybertruck certainly is that.
i'm having trouble making sense of that article too, the thing looks like ◊◊◊◊
 
So many posts on this thread, enumerating the Cybertrucks many faults. It's terrible, it's ugly, surely no one will buy it. And yet, it continues to be the best selling electric truck. It's almost as if people are biased by their dislike for Musk.
yeah, of course. if you have any sense of justice, bad people doing bad thing shouldn't be constantly rewarded. but it is, and it sucks to see that constantly. and you could even say, well he's this great businessman, but he's barely involved in the company. he's got 3 other major companies he also is barely involved in, because there's not enough hours in the day, he's on twitter and apparently diablo all day, and now he's so rich he helped buy an election and is going to be in charge of the "doge" department of government. he's got time for all that, he's rich so he must know. he owns successful companies, must be a genius.

that's ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ ridiculous. and the cybertruck does have a bunch of problems. but yeah, you can come and so oh well he's rich so he's winning. the rich must know best, or they wouldn't be rich.

◊◊◊◊ that idiot.
 
yeah, of course. if you have any sense of justice, bad people doing bad thing shouldn't be constantly rewarded. but it is, and it sucks to see that constantly. and you could even say, well he's this great businessman, but he's barely involved in the company. he's got 3 other major companies he also is barely involved in, because there's not enough hours in the day, he's on twitter and apparently diablo all day, and now he's so rich he helped buy an election and is going to be in charge of the "doge" department of government. he's got time for all that, he's rich so he must know. he owns successful companies, must be a genius.

that's ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ ridiculous. and the cybertruck does have a bunch of problems. but yeah, you can come and so oh well he's rich so he's winning. the rich must know best, or they wouldn't be rich.

◊◊◊◊ that idiot.
He's dropped to position 36 in the global league!
 
Back
Top Bottom