Why church is so dangerous !!!

Originally Posted by Mobyseven
So,if organised religion is dangerous, all political systems are dangerous, and even economic philosophies are dangerous...

What is not dangerous?



Love is not dangerous, and it takes a world of breakings before you understand what love really is. For none of us have it til we learn it thru the testings in life.

But YES life is dangerous anmd hard, and yet the battle field from where we can come out the victor if we learn.

But the real danger is when people stop seeing the dangers of politics, economics and RELIGION and non-thinking.

When they start accepting the staus quo, like the false skeptics do, then they themselves become dangerous to those that don;t accept the status quo and the propaganda that we are spoon fed for control.
 
Ask Bruto, he knows about how Paul started a church system that is into controlling women and sexuality, and based on a hierarchial system of wealth and power.
 
Could you tell me what test I need to do to determine that the "lord is good"? I'd really like to try it out.
 
Could you tell me what test I need to do to determine that the "lord is good"? I'd really like to try it out.

Only the sincere, find out. Seekers have to be honest with themselves before they can come up with honest truthful answers. The insincere and mocking only remain that way.

If you deny the Lord, so be it. Your choice. let it be, as you have made your choice. If you think he is bad, so be it. Your choice, your decision, your responsibility. Deal with it, just don;t mock as that makes your condition worse.
 
Only the sincere, find out. Seekers have to be honest with themselves before they can come up with honest truthful answers. The insincere and mocking only remain that way.

If you deny the Lord, so be it. Your choice. let it be, as you have made your choice. If you think he is bad, so be it. Your choice, your decision, your responsibility. Deal with it, just don;t mock as that makes your condition worse.

The seekers here have been very honest DJJ and many of us have come to the conclusion that there is no evidence of a god.

Words from an old book written by men are not evidence of a god. Just evidence of men's desire for a higher power.

Your veiled threats by saying it is our choice, decision and responsibility are just very amusing. These threats may work on believers, may keep them cowed, may keep them frightened enough to keep believing. That is however, a very sad existence. Also, it does not say much for the belief system if you must hold threats over people to keep them believing. And I am talking about YOU, DJJ, not your strange definition of "church".

A life lived in fear is a life half lived.
 
Only the sincere, find out. Seekers have to be honest with themselves before they can come up with honest truthful answers. The insincere and mocking only remain that way.

If you deny the Lord, so be it. Your choice. let it be, as you have made your choice. If you think he is bad, so be it. Your choice, your decision, your responsibility. Deal with it, just don;t mock as that makes your condition worse.

To show us your sincerity and honesty with yourself in your quest for honest, truthful answerers could you answer a few simple questions for me?

1. Have you corrected, or are you correcting, the many computational errors in the math that you've based many of your claims on?

2. Have you amended your website with the correct distance to the moon?

3. Have you honestly acknowledged to yourself that you prophesied events that failed to occur so you changed the dates to move the events from the past to the future once more?
 
To show us your sincerity and honesty with yourself in your quest for honest, truthful answerers could you answer a few simple questions for me?

1. Have you corrected, or are you correcting, the many computational errors in the math that you've based many of your claims on?

2. Have you amended your website with the correct distance to the moon?

3. Have you honestly acknowledged to yourself that you prophesied events that failed to occur so you changed the dates to move the events from the past to the future once more?

DJJ doesn't seem to like to answer the hard questions (by which I mean: questions that require him to explain things, provide evidence, or admit being wrong), he just ignores them and posts more ranting. He probably won't tell us how we can tell when Paul was "in the spirit" and when he wasn't either.
 
If you deny the Lord, so be it. Your choice. let it be, as you have made your choice. If you think he is bad, so be it. Your choice, your decision, your responsibility. Deal with it, just don;t mock as that makes your condition worse.
Tell us more about how your personal revelation about Jesus inventing sex happened.

jesusvirgin.jpg
 
Only the sincere, find out. Seekers have to be honest with themselves before they can come up with honest truthful answers. The insincere and mocking only remain that way.

If you deny the Lord, so be it. Your choice. let it be, as you have made your choice. If you think he is bad, so be it. Your choice, your decision, your responsibility. Deal with it, just don;t mock as that makes your condition worse.

David, you are the one who came here spouting nonsense. If you are sincere, why don't you engage in normal conversations with other people? Why don't you answer other people's questions?

Why won't you talk to me about Jesus? How am I denying your Lord by having you refuse to talk to me bout Jesus. As far as I can tell, I have chosen to want to learn more about Jesus, you have chosen to say that you know things about them, and I choose to ask you some questions which you seem to choose to ignore.

How is your refusing to talk to me my responsibility?

I have made a choice. I want to learn more about Jesus. Since you claim to know about Jesus and yet won't talk to me about him, I can only assume that you are the one being insincere.
 
Sincerely Schizotypal

DJJ doesn't seem to like to answer the hard questions (by which I mean: questions that require him to explain things, provide evidence, or admit being wrong), he just ignores them and posts more ranting. He probably won't tell us how we can tell when Paul was "in the spirit" and when he wasn't either.
His Garbage amounts to religious satire at best. He continues to make complete fools out of anyone who takes him seriously; he's so hilariously out of touch he can't even keep basic religious ideas intact without reinventing them in his silly image as "truths" to reveal to the unenlightened (read: sane) people.

Truthiness Haiku:

You know you're such a special prophet kinda guy
Have another toke of narcissistic supply
With your head in the sky
Looking down on everyone with meaningful social and sex lives
What, nothing to buy?
 
Whew, now that you guys and gals have got your frustrations out, lets get back to good old fashuioned, DESIGNED SEX.

As the first commandment was have 'sex'. And Adam and Eve had no problem obeying the Lord's commandment to the hilt.
 
Whew, now that you guys and gals have got your frustrations out, lets get back to good old fashuioned, DESIGNED SEX.

As the first commandment was have 'sex'. And Adam and Eve had no problem obeying the Lord's commandment to the hilt.

Are you coming on to us?
 
Have sex and watch the churchies get mad and angry as they are against sex and always have been. The church hates sex as it means they lose another control over people.


Sex unites, but the church wants people tyo unite only under them, and fornicate only with the world. hence, the world is the WHORE of Babylon that steals their souls while giving them gifts.
 
Have sex and watch the churchies get mad and angry as they are against sex and always have been. The church hates sex as it means they lose another control over people.


Sex unites, but the church wants people tyo unite only under them, and fornicate only with the world. hence, the world is the WHORE of Babylon that steals their souls while giving them gifts.

Well there goes your claim that I'm a churchie at least. I love sex. I think it's great. I think every adult should have more of it (Not necessarily with me, but they should enjoy it a lot more freely).
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom