I'll tell you guys tomorrow.
You're such a tease...
I can hardly wait.
I'll tell you guys tomorrow.
Thanks, I can't wait.
You're such a tease...
I can hardly wait.
So what's all the business with the "jury" and "validation" for then?As for why they're delaying, supposedly, they've improved on the design since then and they have demoed it in closed sessions for commercial entities.
Okay, I was going to tell you today, But I've run out of time, so you'll have to wait until tomorrow.![]()
snip...
they should just go ahead and win the million. That, of course, would be just the beginning: they'd be the kings of the world, with the greatest discovery in centuries.
Evidently the jury still hasn't seen a working device, but are working on the maths that they're being fed.
He's now also making noises about the review process taking a couple of years!
And the jury happy with this?
How long can it be till one of them breaks silence.
When are they going to run with the money?
The comment in the post was that he feels the NDC is nonsense since they were misled and the intention is to defraud. This could all be wishful skeptical thinking. I'm just passing it along in the usual spirit... "it must be true, man, I heard it was on the internet".
How do we know this if there's an NDA on it?Supposedly, stoern has published an experimental device specs (to the NDA closed SPDC forum) that explain some of the tech that is making some of the skeptics think there might be something there.