knot
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
- Messages
- 380
False skeptics: must mean those who make up lies about 9/11, such as beam weapons were used to destroy the WTC; or flight 77 did not hit the pentagon. Those who tell these lies could be called False skeptics, because they refuse to understand facts and evidence and instead make up stuff and tell lies.
Those who debunk the liars from the 9/11 truth movement, are not "true skeptics", they are people who use facts. Not sure what a true skeptic would be since the 9/11 truth movement has no facts to back up the lies they tell why would you need to be a skeptic since it is too easy to see they are telling lies? Therefore you do not have to be a skeptic to see through the lies told by conspiracy theorist on 9/11.
To repeat, the topic statement is false. Conspiracy theorist on 9/11 are just fact less people trying to mislead other. That makes them liars. I mean saying a beam weapon brought down the WTC is a lie. Saying flight 93 was shot down is a lie. Saying flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon is a lie. How many lies does it take to prove the 9/11 truth movement is built on lies told by people with no facts?
I have presented some lies from the truth movement to show the Conspiracy theorist on 9/11 are just people trying to tell lies about 9/11.
Agreed. In my countless dialogs I have found them all to be liberals. Why and how they can come up with this stuff is beyond me. Making stuff up is.........nuts.
Just for the record, I am not a neo-con but an independent - I mean centrist.
