beren
Graduate Poster
It's a demonstrable deterrent in regards to John Wayne Gacy and Ted Bundy.
And I'm fine with them being dead. If that makes me a bad person, I'm a bad person I guess.
I dare you to demonstrate it.
It's a demonstrable deterrent in regards to John Wayne Gacy and Ted Bundy.
And I'm fine with them being dead. If that makes me a bad person, I'm a bad person I guess.
Or are you arguing that we're too soft, and a lower bar who death row would help deter murderers?
I dare you to demonstrate it.
I'm saying that Ted Bundy won't kill anyone else ever, being dead and all. I'm also saying that's fine with me.
That's not a deterrent.
I'm saying that Ted Bundy won't kill anyone else ever, being dead and all. I'm also saying that's fine with me.
Fair enough, but what we have here is people who want the equivalent of 'bashing someone's head in with a rock' because of something they read in a news article. This goes beyond an understandable outburst of emotion and into psychopath territory.If someone hurt my family I'd want to bash their heads in with a rock.
So not a deterrent then. Life in prison would have had the same effect. Death penalty no deterrent. Care to try again?
Fair enough, but what we have here is people who want the equivalent of 'bashing someone's head in with a rock' because of something they read in a news article. This goes beyond an understandable outburst of emotion and into psychopath territory.
Care to try what? Being dead, in the ground, Bundy can't kill anyone.
I dare say you don't know, I don't know, no one knows what might deter a serial/spree killer.
Those that are dead like Bundy can't kill (other inmates, prison guards, innocents in an escape) again and I'm okay with that.
"You are going to kill me, and that will protect society from me. But out there are many, many more people... and you are doing nothing about that." - Ted BundyTed Bundy won't kill anyone else ever, being dead and all.
Usually the same fellas who relish hearing of prison rape, or a would-be robber being blown away. I mean really get vicarious enjoyment from hearing of people getting violent comeuppance, like a chemical rush.
"You are going to kill me, and that will protect society from me. But out there are many, many more people... and you are doing nothing about that." - Ted Bundy
You have not shown how death was more effective than imprisonment. Death is no better deterrent than imprisonment in your scenario. So death CAN be a deterrent, but so can ARTHRITIS. Is this really the level of argument you want to employ?
I get great satisfaction from criminals being harshly punished, it's a pretty common piece of wiring in the brain, especially for men. That doesn't mean I let it cloud my rationality, or control my decisions.
If someone hurt my family I'd want to bash their heads in with a rock. But that's neither here nor there when it comes to what's good for society, or the best way to reduce crime.
It's a 100% guaranteed way to get rid of threats to society like the aforementioned Chikatilo or McVeigh.
@Roger_Ramjet
Why do the likes of Breivik, Ian Watkins, Jeffrey Dahmer etc. deserve to be treated humanely, if they didn't have any consideration for their victims?
The whole vibe I'm getting is "kids today, sailor had a portable music device, if he didn't cry he probably would have! The spoiled generation, etc etc".
We should treat them humanly out of concern for our own humanity. Do you really want society to be at the level of these types?
But it does work in putting criminals out of society's misery. See: Andrei Chikatilo, Ted Bundy, Timothy McVeigh.