• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Freeman Movement and England

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yozhik is now flexing his muscles after his recent 'promotion' :jaw-dropp

http://university.ucadia.info/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?830

'Furthermore, contribute to this forum in a positive way, with respect, or that option SHALL be taken away from you.'

He's rock hard :mad:

On a house keeping note perhaps we should start a stand alone UCADIA thread?

Frank the founder seems to be a bit elusive.

When there is a question that Frank needs to be the one to answer it will be forwarded to him. When I do this I copy and paste the question then I copy and paste the answer. The only thing the 'intermediary' does is relay the text .
 
On a more sober note, I draw your attention to paragraph 3 of the response to Lie#5 I’ve studied/read One Heaven (and Ucadia) is a Trap. It is dangerous and false.

the real classy one heaven said:
In truth One Heaven and Ucadia is a challenge and threat for anyone suffering severe mental illness, uncontrollable ego, hatred towards the world or an abundance of arrogant ignorance. Those kind of people may feel “trapped” by being exposed and in response may do what many do, shift the exposure of their unresolved corruptions of mind onto the thing that exposes them.
 
So anyone challenging Ucadia suffers from severe mental illness, uncontrollable ego, hatred towards the world or an abundance of arrogant ignorance. What about the poor souls with mental illness sucked into this idea? I'm sure we can all point to FOTLer's who shall we say are a little flaky but throw in religion and you have a poisonous brew.
 
"One Heaven (and Ucadia) is the work of anti-Semites, anti-religious and deluded conspiracy nuts
This lie is more likely to appear by those who actually are in the business of anti-Semitism, immorality and suffering severe mental illness themselves. It is an old trick of those borne to families originally from Asia such as Mongolia, Khazar and Caucus mountains that stole the identities of families born in Syria, North Africa and Arabia during World War II to call anyone who exposes them as anti-semitic"


Where did this 'fake Jews' stuff come from? I know Arthur Koestler wrote something about it but his Khazars were converts to Judaism, no?
 
"One Heaven (and Ucadia) is the work of anti-Semites, anti-religious and deluded conspiracy nuts
This lie is more likely to appear by those who actually are in the business of anti-Semitism, immorality and suffering severe mental illness themselves. It is an old trick of those borne to families originally from Asia such as Mongolia, Khazar and Caucus mountains that stole the identities of families born in Syria, North Africa and Arabia during World War II to call anyone who exposes them as anti-semitic"


Where did this 'fake Jews' stuff come from? I know Arthur Koestler wrote something about it but his Khazars were converts to Judaism, no?

Wiki has some background on it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars#Theory_of_Khazar_ancestry_of_Ashkenazi_Jews

Apparently it grew out of 19th-century European "racial studies". There seems to be reason to believe that the upper levels of Khazar society adopted Judaism as a religion, but the claim that Ashkenazic Jews are descended from Khazar converts is refuted by genetic studies which have shown that Ashkenazim are more closely related to each other and to Middle Eastern populations than to their European neighbors.

One thing is certain: anyone who babbles about Khazars as the ancestors of modern Jews is getting his ideas from neo-Nazis. It's diagnostic in the same way that a splintered bone end protruding from the flesh is diagnostic of a compound fracture.
 
So anyone challenging Ucadia suffers from severe mental illness, uncontrollable ego, hatred towards the world or an abundance of arrogant ignorance.


No, it's "a challenge and threat for anyone suffering severe mental illness, uncontrollable ego, hatred towards the world or an abundance of arrogant ignorance" because they might actually believe it.
 
Ralfy and twister have now been banned from Ickes and Ucadia respectively.
I started a thread on Ickes called " Change of sub-forum"
I asked the question "should this forum be renamed "religion on the land"
It was fun while it lasted :D
Menard is hiding under a rock and Frank is leaving Ucadia:D:D:D:D

nice.....
 
Last edited:
I am hanging up my freeman spurs, its all over now, they have finally given it up as a bad job.
Menard has run a mile and is hiding away trying to come up with something new to get back his audience from Ucadia.:D

His "withdraw your consent" theory is in tatters and he cannot now justify his own position anymore.
They are all now looking to Frank to hold their hands and change their diapers.

It has been fun and I will keep a look out for Menard surfacing on other sites peddling his "consent" garbage to any newbies and nip it in the bud. ;)

Please drop me a line if you see him anywhere.
 
i got a feeling menard will still be around. in between appearances by menard, the "contractors" can receive a beating as well. their position is not really fundamentally different from the "consenters".
 
I would sooner burst his bubble on sites where he is not protected, he frequents law forums on occasion and they just get confused with his nonsense, it will be good to give them the heads up.
 
Freeman Movement and America...

Freemen.Freeforums.org

A Forum for Freemen who understand the "Systems" of Law and Money
 
Here's your link

http://freemen.freeforums.org/

..............................................................
ETA: If you have the host's ear you may want to suggest that the definitions section actually include definitions.

http: //freemen.freeforums.org/words-terms-defined-f30.html

Nothing is gained by defining lawful as: " 'Lawful' is what it is all about. 'Lawful' .vs. 'unlawful'. Do not get trapped into discussing 'legal'/'illegal'."
 
Last edited:
Freemen.Freeforums.org

A Forum for Freemen who understand the "Systems" of Law and Money



Total posts 218 • Total topics 106 • Total members 23


Number of sub-fora, excluding admin ones like "Terms of Use": 23.



Just a friendly suggestion: less is more, when you have an average of just over 2 posts/topic, and about 5 topics/forum.
 
Oh, and:

http://freemen.freeforums.org/pros-cons-of-trademarking-my-name-t83.html

Trademarking doesn't work like that.



A trademark or trade mark or trade-mark[1] is a distinctive sign or indicator used by an individual, business organization, or other legal entity to identify that the products or services to consumers with which the trademark appears originate from a unique source, and to distinguish its products or services from those of other entities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark




Obtaining a trademark

A person or business entity acquires rights in a trademark either by using it in the normal course of business (for example on a tag or label for merchandise being sold to the public) or by filing an application for registration of the mark in the USPTO. An application for registration may be based upon actual use in commerce or upon a bona fide intent to use (ITU). An ITU application will not become a registration until documents evidencing actual use of the mark in interstate commerce, which generally must be shown within a limited time period. Infringing use can only be stopped with actual registration, not an ITU.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_trademark_law



So, in the example you use, "Sarah Palin", she might be able to trademark her name, because she's using it to market actual products - books, personal appearances, Shooting expeditions in the Alaskan Wilderness, whatever. You would only be able to do the same if you're using you name in some sort of similar capacity - and intend to keep on doing that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom