The Freeman Movement and England
- Thread starter Especially
- Start date
-
- Tags
- fotl freeman on the land
- Status
jargon buster
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,773
With a bazooka.
FOTLs are making their presence known as Occupy LSX. The Guardian found a chap who calls himself "commonly known as dom" who had these words of wisdom...
"I might be a danger to corporate control of humanity, but what's the worst they're going to do? Lock me up? The last place they want me to be teaching is in prison. I've been in jail: I talk to the inmates, I talk to the screws. I take every opportunity to speak to the police, to educate them. Don't forget, the police are part of the solution. I'll talk to anyone: laymen, lawyers, magistrates, judges.
I say to people: educate yourself. Google "lawful rebellion". Google "freeman on the land". Google the difference between "legal" and "lawful". Understand the rules that are keeping you enslaved."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/nov/15/welfare-education-law-occupy-london
This clown has been enlightening his fellow occupiers about the FOTL woo (various videos on Youtube) and can be seen spouting his nonsense in the video below. The New World Order gets a mention at 2.40. His belief that the legal definition of occupy is "to go to war" comes up at 3.10 and, rather delightfully, he reckons the whole Occupy LSX thing is an "inside job". He's pretty far gone and, by the looks of some of the other videos, has found a few disciples.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L1ax_5lDws
The Guardian allowed a voice of sanity to prevail yesterday:
The love freemen show for magic texts, incantations and ritual is not just funny: it shows a strange, childlike respect for the trappings of justice, and a commitment to jargon not even the stuffiest solicitor can match. This thinking is to law as crystal healing is to medicine and, like fake healing, it's not as harmless as first appears.
Perhaps some freemen really have found that small debts have been written off because of the nuisance they've been able to cause. Confusing people can be a useful way of bluffing, and fobbing them off. But there are limits. The barrister and law blogger Adam Wagner has called freemanism "quackery plain and simple" and says: "These ideas are most attractive to desperate, vulnerable people who are going through terrible times in their lives."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2011/nov/16/law-protest-occupy-freemen
"I might be a danger to corporate control of humanity, but what's the worst they're going to do? Lock me up? The last place they want me to be teaching is in prison. I've been in jail: I talk to the inmates, I talk to the screws. I take every opportunity to speak to the police, to educate them. Don't forget, the police are part of the solution. I'll talk to anyone: laymen, lawyers, magistrates, judges.
I say to people: educate yourself. Google "lawful rebellion". Google "freeman on the land". Google the difference between "legal" and "lawful". Understand the rules that are keeping you enslaved."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/nov/15/welfare-education-law-occupy-london
This clown has been enlightening his fellow occupiers about the FOTL woo (various videos on Youtube) and can be seen spouting his nonsense in the video below. The New World Order gets a mention at 2.40. His belief that the legal definition of occupy is "to go to war" comes up at 3.10 and, rather delightfully, he reckons the whole Occupy LSX thing is an "inside job". He's pretty far gone and, by the looks of some of the other videos, has found a few disciples.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L1ax_5lDws
The Guardian allowed a voice of sanity to prevail yesterday:
The love freemen show for magic texts, incantations and ritual is not just funny: it shows a strange, childlike respect for the trappings of justice, and a commitment to jargon not even the stuffiest solicitor can match. This thinking is to law as crystal healing is to medicine and, like fake healing, it's not as harmless as first appears.
Perhaps some freemen really have found that small debts have been written off because of the nuisance they've been able to cause. Confusing people can be a useful way of bluffing, and fobbing them off. But there are limits. The barrister and law blogger Adam Wagner has called freemanism "quackery plain and simple" and says: "These ideas are most attractive to desperate, vulnerable people who are going through terrible times in their lives."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2011/nov/16/law-protest-occupy-freemen
- Status