Smokescreen at the Pentagon

Ah yes, another argument by "I never seen it before, so it ain't true".

Yankee451, you have fallen for the trap of the Availability Heuristic

Worst thing is, I found and linked him an example. Of course it's not a multi-ton diesel generator which is burning so there is no where near as much smoke/steam coming out of it, but he hasn't seemed to figure that out yet.
 
so I've been trying to find examples of other fires that have black smoke as well as a billowing plume of thick, white smoke but I can't seem to find them.

Can you guys and gals find any?
Your inability to use Google and decidedly stubborn refusal to accept facts as presented to you multiple times about the generator in question, one has to wonder if it's intentional or not?
 
I have the feeling that anyone who comes up with something he has no response to goes on Ignore.
He'd be better off putting the entire forum on ignore, or vice versa.

I'm more stunned at how impervious to correction someone can be about their own hypothesis... It's like me coming up with a new way the Titanic sunk and then when everyone tells me I'm wrong I just sit there moving goalposts and claiming victory..
 
Last edited:
Just a short video comparing a military-grade smoke machine to the billowing smoke at the Pentagon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39IwxayVeIw

UpperclassTwit.jpg
 
well there's your generator but it's not exactly a huge billowing cloud of white smoke is it?

Interesting how the lighter smoke hugs the ground, as compared to the Pentagon:

Funny how easy it was to find evidence contradicting your claim?

spraying_generator_zps4d49feb1.jpg

Notice the generator is being sprayed with foam but there's still a plume of white smoke?
 
Last edited:
It's just an observation. Can you point to any other fires that have white, billowing smoke emanating from a central, apparently cylindrical nozzle? Or is that just another 9/11 curiosity to be shrugged off?

No. It's not anything.

Yankee, did you speak to any of the first responders to the Pentagon before making your video?
 

Thank you. So you are literally making things up with no basis in fact.

Did you before you assumed it was all true?

I made no assumption. I believe the evidence derived from an investigation that has been fully vetted from multiple agencies and organizations and has to date not been seriously challenged. You, as you have just admitted, did none of this.
 
Does Yankee ever have anything more than incredulity when proven wrong?

Yeah, he throws out an over simplified understanding of world politics. Apparently if you don't believe that which is absurd on its face it means you want to roast Afghan babies on spits or something.
 
Yeah, he throws out an over simplified understanding of world politics. Apparently if you don't believe that which is absurd on its face it means you want to roast Afghan babies on spits or something.

Right. It's reminding me of Rob Balsamo and CIT. You either agree with him or you're obviously disinfo shill.
 
Does Yankee ever have anything more than incredulity when proven wrong?

Actually I'm one of the few people here who admits error when I make them. What are you referring to? The billowing smoke complete with bursts of flame because the burner was too hot?

Do you insist it's steam?
 
Thank you. So you are literally making things up with no basis in fact.



I made no assumption. I believe the evidence derived from an investigation that has been fully vetted from multiple agencies and organizations and has to date not been seriously challenged. You, as you have just admitted, did none of this.

You haven't read any of their reports, have you?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom