Smokescreen at the Pentagon

ozeco41 said:
...and how did inexperienced pilots manage to get the smoke machine to fly the manoeuvres involved in the final stages of the flight THEN hit the target.

After all it would be the "first time'. There is no recorded evidence of any pilot of a smoke machine hitting a five sided building on any previous occasion.

And nothing can happen for the first time. So it must be an "inside job".*

:boxedin:

[/trutherlogic] << oxymoron

;)


* Because what is impossible for an 'outside job' somehow becomes possible if it is an 'inside job'... go figure. :confused:
Click to expand...

I'm glad we're getting these points addressed since it is always difficult for twoofers to address them correctly. Their "stories" always have that "incomplete dot connecting" appearance to them. :rolleyes:
 
fuelair said:
2) In addition, you might have noticed (I certainly did) that the military device did not at any point produce dark gray/black smoke. I am quite certain that modification of the smoke formula could certainly produce darker smoke - but not at the same time as the white. Thus, two machines would have been necessary - meaning quite a bit more problem with moving them into the building without being noticed or having any visible external activity.

Hope this helps!!!
Click to expand...

Maybe they moved them in under cover of a smoke machine.

Damn... now we've got three! :(
 
Someone with better Photoshop skills than I needs to create an image of a flying smoke machine.
 
Robrob said:
Someone with better Photoshop skills than I needs to create an image of a flying smoke machine.
Click to expand...
All things considered here, I thought this would be appropriate:
9bmc.jpg


:D
 
Clearly the smoke machine was inside the plane. The Star Chamber needed to make sure there was enough smoke to make it convincing. You just can not rely on an air crash to produce enough smoke.

Perhaps that also explains the "pod" seen on blurry low-res photo's of Flight 175 - external smoke machine pod.
 
Mark F said:
Perhaps that also explains the "pod" seen on blurry low-res photo's of Flight 175 - external smoke machine pod.
Click to expand...

Did these fail or what? From the smoke pouring out of the towers we could tell the fires were burning off.
 
Think I got it guys...

LOLSteve_zps69bd17c6.png


I knew Poke'mon were a government conspiracy...
 
Last edited:
Bell said:
I didn't read those, thinking they were spam for some new penis enlargement medication.
Click to expand...

Well the emails were about penis enlargement medication, but they weren't spam. They are making it mandatory for all employees to take them, and that they would be covered on the health plan.

Project AmJapNin was briefly mentioned as a PS in that email.
 
Point of order! I mostly post at another board where the Prime Directive is "Don't be a jerk." Even so, I've found this board even less tolerant of jerkish behavior. However, I just read the posts in AAH and concluded that yankee451 is acting in an abusive and trollish manner that would've gotten him banned long ago on that other board, especially his insulting treatment of Hal Bidlack, yet he continues to post. Is having stupid, trollish jerks like him around just fun and entertaining, the way he raises every time he's called, though his hand is complete garbage and everybody besides him knows it? Because I can see how that can be fun.
 
Last edited:
Hog wash. The smoke from the smoke projectors is heavier than air and is designed to sink to near-ground-level and to be slow to dissipate. The white plume rising from the burning generator looks exactly like the steam that is produced when spraying water onto a very hot fire. This is a total failure on your grade record.
 
Not that I like adding to the pile-on bonanza but I think the smoke machine theory just topped to weirdest (and dumbest) unsupported pentagon "theory" I've ever heard. Yet it feels like this isn't the first time I've heard it either... Forget watching the video... I just find this theory to be the result of people who pay absolutely no attention to what had happened... I mean the theory feels way too forced for it to have been made whilst aware of what evidence was already seen by pretty much everyone including the kitchen sink....
 
fuelair said:
Ahh, after actually watching the video, my thoughts were drawn to two minor points: 1) due to the size of the device, it would have been quite obvious to persons in the building that it had been brought in as it would take up rather a lot of space and two + corridors would have to have been removed to get it to the proper location. I point this out as the only other alternative would have been to demolish/remove the outer part of the building prior to the smoke being produced and moving the device in. Any activity of that type could not be done in DC (24 hour city) without drawing lot's of notice.

2) In addition, you might have noticed (I certainly did) that the military device did not at any point produce dark gray/black smoke. I am quite certain that modification of the smoke formula could certainly produce darker smoke - but not at the same time as the white. Thus, two machines would have been necessary - meaning quite a bit more problem with moving them into the building without being noticed or having any visible external activity.

Hope this helps!!!
Click to expand...


1 - Then obviously the people who were there were aware the machine was there. Certainly the photographer who captured the video was.

2 - Smoke machines can produce many different colors of smoke, but the one at the pentagon was producing white smoke so I agree - the darker smoke was caused by something else, such as an actual fire or a different machine.

Your observations are evidence that this conspiracy is much larger than you assume.
 
Grizzly Bear said:
Not that I like adding to the pile-on bonanza but I think the smoke machine theory just topped to weirdest (and dumbest) unsupported pentagon "theory" I've ever heard. Yet it feels like this isn't the first time I've heard it either... Forget watching the video... I just find this theory to be the result of people who pay absolutely no attention to what had happened... I mean the theory feels way too forced for it to have been made whilst aware of what evidence was already seen by pretty much everyone including the kitchen sink....
Click to expand...

The "dumbest" theory is the official one.

All I did was compare the video of a smoke machine with the video of the Pentagon and left it up to the viewer to make their own conclusions. I see when you put two and two together you get something other than four.
 
triforcharity said:
That was not my fault. I told those guys that BLACK smoke is what is needed, apparently someone ordered the wrong stuff. Imbeciles. :D
Click to expand...

Why would they need to be sure they used black smoke when they can count on the boundless credulity of the public? Imbeciles, indeed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom