Smokescreen at the Pentagon

The "dumbest" theory is the official one.

All I did was compare the video of a smoke machine with the video of the Pentagon and left it up to the viewer to make their own conclusions. I see when you put two and two together you get something other than four.

Common sense to me is that fighting the "official story" that you believe is idiocy with something "dumber" is really self-defeating to you.
 
1 - Then obviously the people who were there were aware the machine was there. Certainly the photographer who captured the video was.

2 - Smoke machines can produce many different colors of smoke, but the one at the pentagon was producing white smoke so I agree - the darker smoke was caused by something else, such as an actual fire or a different machine.

Your observations are evidence that this conspiracy is much larger than you assume.
So the witnesses as well as the video of - the diesel power generator burning, this means what?

The "dumbest" theory is the official one.

All I did was compare the video of a smoke machine with the video of the Pentagon and left it up to the viewer to make their own conclusions. I see when you put two and two together you get something other than four.
Your own edited video shows the power generator burning. Why did you feel the need to edit it in the first place?

Why would they need to be sure they used black smoke when they can count on the boundless credulity of the public? Imbeciles, indeed.
So the conspiracy felt the need to add smoke to the crash site but not the need to make the smoke match the color of the crash site?

Why is it every conspiracy theory sounds like it was written by a not particularly bright ten year old?
 
1 - Then obviously the people who were there were aware the machine was there. Certainly the photographer who captured the video was.

2 - Smoke machines can produce many different colors of smoke, but the one at the pentagon was producing white smoke so I agree - the darker smoke was caused by something else, such as an actual fire or a different machine.

Your observations are evidence that this conspiracy is much larger than you assume.

The "dumbest" theory is the official one.

All I did was compare the video of a smoke machine with the video of the Pentagon and left it up to the viewer to make their own conclusions. I see when you put two and two together you get something other than four.

No you didn't, as evidenced by the preceding post, where you clearly state there was a smoke machine in use at the Pentagon.
 
Last edited:
Why would they need to be sure they used black smoke when they can count on the boundless credulity of the public? Imbeciles, indeed.

This argument is not compelling and you haven't presented any real, tangible evidence, so I don't believe you. If you're serious about wanting to convince people, then you should do some actual research.
 
Last edited:
kid meatball said:
The "dumbest" theory is the official one.

All I did was compare the video of a smoke machine with the video of the Pentagon and left it up to the viewer to make their own conclusions. I see when you put two and two together you get something other than four.

No you didn't, as evidenced by the preceding post, where you clearly state there was a smoke machine in use at the Pentagon.

Why do they do that, do they think no one remembers their original claims?
 
This argument is not compelling and you haven't presented any real, tangible evidence, so I don't believe you. If you're serious about wanting to convince people, then you should do some actual research.

Far from compelling, its plain stupid, one of the least 'compelling' arguments posited in the name of 911 truth.
 
The "dumbest" theory is the official one.

All I did was compare the video of a smoke machine with the video of the Pentagon and left it up to the viewer to make their own conclusions. I see when you put two and two together you get something other than four.

Actually, there's one that's dumber.
 
Comparisons to other fires

so I've been trying to find examples of other fires that have black smoke as well as a billowing plume of thick, white smoke but I can't seem to find them.

Can you guys and gals find any?

Building_7_fire.jpg


universal-studios-fire-vidshot2.jpg


caracas_fire.jpg


fire-edit_1376938085708_2422298_ver1.0_640_480.jpg


http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/imag0484.jpg

image.jpg


ParqueCentralFire.gif
 
Can you make up dumber claims?

It's just an observation. Can you point to any other fires that have white, billowing smoke emanating from a central, apparently cylindrical nozzle? Or is that just another 9/11 curiosity to be shrugged off?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom