One Million Rupees Offer to prove "Homeopathy is Paranormal"

I think Dr MAS knows all that, Rolfe, and is simply trying to stall the issue so that he isn't actually called on it. Hence I don't think the One Million Rupee Challenge exists at all.

I also can't find it by Googling, except for here on this forum. So clearly it is an imaginary entity.

Or else... Dr MAS has put it up on a closed website somewhere but is pretending it is in the public domain. But by hiding it, he prevents any applicants he can't control or doesn't want, such as we skeptics (who can demolish him at will). But then he also sits there thumbing his nose at us and thinks he is looking good to his cohorts. So childish, really.

The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy
"`...You hadn't exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them had you? I mean like actually telling anyone or anything.'
`But the plans were on display...'
`On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.'
`That's the display department.'
`With a torch.'
`Ah, well the lights had probably gone.'
`So had the stairs.'
`But look you found the notice didn't you?'
`Yes,' said Arthur, `yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of The Leopard".'"
 
I'm inclined to agree with you. Zep. I find it difficult to believe that anyone who can actually type and turn on a computer can be quite so obtuse as Mas is making himself out to be. Still, it doesn't hurt to spell it out in clear just in case we might get a reaction from him. He was active in his other thread within the past few hours, but I notice he didn't add anything here.

Rolfe.
 
Kumar said:
But still some miss in understanding & relating any concept with anything can be there, which probably we may understand during discussions, by chance.

Kumar, scientists all over the world already know what areas are not yet fully understood. Relating "any concept with anything" on a discussion board would expose new areas for further research? You gotta be kidding. Banging random objects together won't produce new wonderful inventions.

Kumar said:
Furthur, we are discussing a concept which is yet minimal in science, so don't make it a point that everything can be clear & in accordance with science, immediately.

What is beeing discussed here is fully understood by science!. It is not "a concept which is yet minimal in science".

Before starting to connect concepts you could at least take the time to understand one at a time. What you're doing is the equivalent to this:

"kumar"
My computer is not working. Nothing happens when I press the keys on the keyboard?

"it-guy"
Have you checked the cables?

"kumar"
Can maybe it's possible it is the steering wheel?

"it-guy"
ehh...there is no steering wheel in computers.

"kumar"
(link to www.howstuffworks) Is indicated here that keyboard control computer in similar way as steering wheel control car. Please clarify if steering wheel can be at fault?

"it-guy"
NO! Seriously, there are no steering wheels in computers! Check your cables!

"kumar"
But still some miss in understanding & relating any concept with anything can be there, which probably we may understand during discussions, by chance. Also vested interest in computer industry can make not possible technology advances in any mass existing thing.

"it-guy"
NO (TM)

"kumar"
(link to www.howstuffworks) Is indicated in research that chemical reactions take place in plastic that is exposed to lead (is found in pollution). Please respond accordingly if plastic cover of keyboard and possible reaction in polluted environment can be at cause?

and so on, and so on, and so on...
 
Jocce: You were doing well until you got to "Please respond accordingly if plastic cover of keyboard and possible reaction in polluted environment can be at cause?" Kumar would actually ask if the plastic cover of the steering wheel is reacting with the environment :)
 
Jocce said:
"kumar"
My computer is not working. Nothing happens when I press the keys on the keyboard?

"it-guy"
Have you checked the cables?

"kumar"
Can maybe it's possible it is the steering wheel?

"it-guy"
ehh...there is no steering wheel in computers.

"kumar"
(link to www.howstuffworks) Is indicated here that keyboard control computer in similar way as steering wheel control car. Please clarify if steering wheel can be at fault?

"it-guy"
NO! Seriously, there are no steering wheels in computers! Check your cables!

"kumar"
But still some miss in understanding & relating any concept with anything can be there, which probably we may understand during discussions, by chance. Also vested interest in computer industry can make not possible technology advances in any mass existing thing.

"it-guy"
NO (TM)

"kumar"
(link to www.howstuffworks) Is indicated in research that chemical reactions take place in plastic that is exposed to lead (is found in pollution). Please respond accordingly if plastic cover of keyboard and possible reaction in polluted environment can be at cause?

and so on, and so on, and so on...
:roll: :clap: Thanks, you made my day!
 
Darat said:

He/she can mention anything alike a student.

"Kumar, scientists all over the world already know what areas are not yet fully understood. Relating "any concept with anything""

Can we depend "absolutely" on sayings of scientists? Previously, Throg told something practical.
 
Alike a student maybe, but mentioning understanding & relating any concept with anything can be there how and why this not make sense?
 
Kumar, any mass existing thing can function independently in all energy levels and vested interest on quantum level is cause in many type operation. If we can agree on that, surely TTTT will be only functioning well on a semantic scale topic.

Agreed?

PS. I also have to admit I don't have a single lettercombination after my name so you don't have to take my opinions like "a musing in total respons". DS
 
Kumar said:
He/she can mention anything alike a student.

"Kumar, scientists all over the world already know what areas are not yet fully understood. Relating "any concept with anything""

Can we depend "absolutely" on sayings of scientists? Previously, Throg told something practical.
If you take the titles so seriously then perhaps someone should change yours to "Ignorant Buffoon", because you don't illuminate squat.

All the evidence regarding homeopathy points to it being nothing but a placebo, and having the efectiveness to match. Before you can even begin to contradict scientists in your search for absolutes, you need to present evidence. Got any?
 
Darat said:
Alike a student maybe, but mentioning understanding & relating any concept with anything can be there how and why this not make sense?

Everything (mentioning understanding & relating) may not be "absolute non-sense". But some recent developments can be....
 
Donks said:
If you take the titles so seriously then perhaps someone should change yours to "Ignorant Buffoon", because you don't illuminate squat.

All the evidence regarding homeopathy points to it being nothing but a placebo, and having the efectiveness to match. Before you can even begin to contradict scientists in your search for absolutes, you need to present evidence. Got any?

What other, then I am trying here? Most may be ignorant about 'mass existing but still unclear in science', so all can be titled accordingly--in that aspect.
 
Kumar said:
Everything (mentioning understanding & relating) may not be "absolute non-sense". But some recent developments can be....
Yes, like your suggeston that homoeopaths deliberately coat the bottles used to make the serial dilutions so that there is material remedy in all the potencies....

If anything was needed to prove that you are being deliberately annoying, Kumar, it is that suggestion. Your feigned ignorance of the fact that the forum designations (unless altered) merely reflect the number of posts that a poster has made and have nothing at all to do with the quality or sense of the posts is another.

Aren't you bored yet, troll?

Rolfe.
 
Kumar said:
What other, then I am trying here? Most may be ignorant about 'mass existing but still unclear in science', so all can be titled accordingly--in that aspect.
I have no clue what you are trying to do here. I don't understand why someone would come to a skeptics' board and then refuse to accept or provide evidence, sound logic or supported theories. Why do you come here? You should know by now that a) you will not convince anyone that homeopathy works by making up theories; and b) that we will not provide you with a theory of how homeopathy works, because there is no evidence that homeopathy could possibly work.
 
Dr. MAS said:
kindly visit this page and do not shout.

http://www.nchpakistan.com/news&events2.htm

Hans has raised his hands up.

You can still win.
There are no details about your challenge on that site. You challenge does not exist.

I have raised my hands up in disgust.

Can we come to the matter at hand? Explain homeopathy, like you said you could. Or be ignored.

Hans
 
Last bite

Rolfe said:
Yes, like your suggeston that homoeopaths deliberately coat the bottles used to make the serial dilutions so that there is material remedy in all the potencies....

If anything was needed to prove that you are being deliberately annoying, Kumar, it is that suggestion. Your feigned ignorance of the fact that the forum designations (unless altered) merely reflect the number of posts that a poster has made and have nothing at all to do with the quality or sense of the posts is another.

Aren't you bored yet, troll?

Rolfe.

Rolfe, since 'biting me' remains your job, mostly, you have also taken many pollings for me so just do a last favour to all. Do a poll with just two options. "Should Kumar continue posting here AND Should he not". I promise, I shall post as per poll results, in future. Since, my student life is mostly over & I am bit pro- dynamism, also like all knowledges & hate otherwise--it may be very difficult for me to change at this stage. So no other option can work out.:(

Thanks in advance. Bye.

P.S. Aren't you bored yet, troll?

Yes, I am. But most may not. Evidance: Few recent topics.
 
Like I said: He's (finally) flaming out. "Make a poll to see if I should stop posting", indeed :rolleyes:. Who'd have thought he was just a simple attention whore?


Hans
 
Originally posted by Kumar
Do a poll with just two options. "Should Kumar continue posting here AND Should he not".
I hope you get a homeopathic remedy response! :D
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom