TraitorBasher
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2007
- Messages
- 259
Thanks for the link. (sort of).
So what?
So I have destroyed kookbreakers ridiculous claim that there is no temperature in space.
Thanks for the link. (sort of).
So what?
Heat is also transmitted via waves.
What temperature would the thermometer show?
So I have destroyed kookbreakers ridiculous claim that there is no temperature in space.
So I have destroyed kookbreakers ridiculous claim that there is no temperature in space.
In 1969 computer chips had not been invented. The maximum computer memory was 256k, and this was housed in a large air conditioned building. In 2002 a top of the range computer requires at least 64 Mb of memory to run a simulated Moon landing, and that does not include the memory required to take off again once landed. The alleged computer on board Apollo 11 had 32k of memory. That's the equivalent of a simple calculator.
ERichardson-
What computational tasks were required for going to the moon?
So what? Technicaly you could get to moon with zero computeing power by doing all the maths by hand
Um back in the mid 90s I ran them on systems with 4MB and thaat was hardly putting the system under stress. Simulations are meaningless though since they had the real thing to play with. The right brothers couldn't run computer sims of their flights did they not happen?
You can use the same memory or just do the whole thing manualy. It's a non issue.
You can do a lot with 32K if you don't have to worry about a fancy GUI. Certianly newtonian physics which is all you need for a moon landing (don't even have to allow for air resitance).
Correct.ERich, around here most still believe Oswald killed JFK...
Correct....and Osama did 9/11.
Thanks to the presence or absence of that little item called evidence. For all three of your examples.You won't convince anybody the moon landings were faked.
You seem to think that outer space is hot. That is wrong. It has no temperature.
If we put a thermometer in darkest space, with absolutely nothing around, it would first have to cool off. This might take a very very long time. Once it cooled off, it would read 2.7 Kelvin. This is because of the "3 degree microwave background radiation." No matter where you go, you cannot escape it -- it is always there.
Would any of you walk on the light side of the moon in a suit without air conditioning?
Definitely. I'd much prefer, say, a liquid-cooled undergarment connected to a sublimating plate.Would any of you walk on the light side of the moon in a suit without air conditioning?
Would any of you walk on the light side of the moon in a suit without air conditioning?
Originally posted by kookbreaker
Kookbreakers claim was very easily destroyed.
So... how come the Moon never reaches that temperature? Isn't it in space?Originally posted by kookbreaker:
You seem to think that outer space is hot. That is wrong. It has no temperature.Kookbreakers claim was very easily destroyed.If we put a thermometer in darkest space, with absolutely nothing around, it would first have to cool off. This might take a very very long time. Once it cooled off, it would read 2.7 Kelvin. This is because of the "3 degree microwave background radiation." No matter where you go, you cannot escape it -- it is always there.
Your source proves our point that a vacuum has no temperature. An object in deep, dark space would cool off to the temperature of the objects around it through mutual exchange of radiation. The object that surrounds everything is the MBR, at a temp of 2.7 K. But it's extremely distant, and you can't say that the temperature of the vacuum is 2.7 K because the MBR is 2.7 K.Its a vacuum. And kookbreaker claimed there was no temperature. Total rubbish. There would be a temperature even if it was close to absolute zero.
What do you think happens in a vacuum to a thermometer?
If we put a thermometer in darkest space, with absolutely nothing around, it would first have to cool off. This might take a very very long time. Once it cooled off, it would read 2.7 Kelvin. This is because of the "3 degree microwave background radiation." No matter where you go, you cannot escape it -- it is always there.
the vacuum of space:Someone had to do it. Sorry.![]()
Would any of you walk on the light side of the moon in a suit without air conditioning?
How could the astronauts survive in the heat of the Moon's day? Objects that are heated cannot be cooled by space.
This is true, to a point, however spacesuits can radiate heat. All objects above absolute zero radiate heat; therefore some of the heat energy received from the Sun is radiated back into space as infrared rays. Also, much of the Sun's radiant energy can be reflected away. The astronaut's spacesuits were white because this color reflects the most radiation, thereby minimizing the amount absorbed. Finally, the spacesuits were equipped with a cooling system that utilized water as a medium to carry away excess heat.
The cooling system consisted of a cooling garment worn by the astronaut, a heat exchanger, and a porous plate sublimator. Water was circulated through tubes in the cooling garment where it absorbed heat from the astronaut’s body and then carried it to the heat exchanger in the backpack. As water passed through the heat exchanger, heat was transferred to a layer of ice on the surface of the porous plate sublimator causing the ice to sublimate and the resulting gas carried away the unwanted heat. The ice was replaced by continually seeping a small amount of water through holes in the metal plate of the sublimator. When the water was exposed to the vacuum of space, the sudden drop in pressure caused it to immediately freeze onto the plate’s surface.
IIRC the casules were balanced, so the heat generated by the equipment and bodies is balanced by the heat lost to spaceYour source proves our point that a vacuum has no temperature. An object in deep, dark space would cool off to the temperature of the objects around it through mutual exchange of radiation. The object that surrounds everything is the MBR, at a temp of 2.7 K. But it's extremely distant, and you can't say that the temperature of the vacuum is 2.7 K because the MBR is 2.7 K.
However, the Apollo ships were not in deep, dark space. They were being shined on by the Sun. I don't know for sure, but it wouldn't surprise me to find out that the color and shinyness of the capsule were chosen so that the solar heat, body heat, and electronics heat generated, balance with the heat lost through radiation. On the other hand, maybe there was a net heat gain from the first three, so they painted the command module white and still had to get rid of some heat.
Also, their air conditioners were not at all like the ones we use in houses and cars.