[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

You better start asking your government this because when we demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt how the plane flew on the north side of the citgo it will have established definitively that what you were told happened to the light poles and flight 77 simply isn't the case.

What? The Dutch government was behind this?
 
You better start asking your government this because when we demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt how the plane flew on the north side of the citgo it will have established definitively that what you were told happened to the light poles and flight 77 simply isn't the case.

Whenever you feel like posting objective, verifiable evidence; or anecdotal, subjective evidence that can be corroborated by objective evidence; feel free. Until then, kindly stfu.
 
this isn't funny though.



the attack on this good man's credibility and integrity was appalling. after being welcomed into the company of Father McGraw they proceed to snidely try to devalue and destroy his testimony of what he witnessed that day.
Does lyte + co truly believe that he is lying about when he ministered to the badly wounded and dying? Obviously it seem's so and for that they are no better than cockroaches.

BV

He is in the pictures.

We know he was there administering to the wounded and dying.

I didn't not claim that he IS a deep cover agent.

Just that he is a prime candidate for one.

Nobody grows up "in the area" and doesn't know what building is the pentagon.

Escpecially when you were a DOJ attorney for 5 years!

But does that prove he is an agent?

Nope.

He at least had the sense to admit that he merely deduced the fact that the light poles were hit.
 
And Mr England?

What was it? Senile, lying, confused, paid off, hypnotised, under the thrall of the cookie monster.

Trip. YOU are a lying deceitful coward.
 
Last edited:
Question: What makes you so confident in your evidence that you conclude that all the known eyewitness tesimony was lies and all the known physical evidence was staged?

How do you know your new evidence is not faked/planted/lies/manipulation/misintepretation?

Where did I claim this?

Most witnesses are telling the truth exactly as they remember it.

But I wouldn't be a very good critical thinker if I were to investigate a 9/11 conspiracy and not consider the possiblity that SOME of the witnesses were planted.

You will be able to determine for yourself if you believe the evidence we present has been planted.
 
And Mr England?

What was it? Senile, lying, confused, paid off, hypnotised, under the thrall of the cookie monster.

Trip. YOU are a lying deceitful coward.

Or manipulated or threatned.

We will most likely never know.

But his story doesn't remotely hold up to scrutiny and in light of the new evidence we have; it is a proven farce.

Please tell me what I have lied or been cowardly about or retract your claim.
 
Trip, you're an idiot.

You've deceived almost everyone you've spoken to, yes I read Screw loose I see what you post.

Dishonest does not begin to describe the way you've aopproached this.

Then you have the nerve to come here with arrogant egotistical posing!

You're the scum of the Earth.
 
Last edited:
Where are the spooks smashing a pole through Mr Englands windshield in this pic?

http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n41/jofomu/pentagon-fire-width.jpg

Where are the spooks placing any poles in this pic?

http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n41/jofomu/pentagon-fire-width.jpg

This was taken as you can see, seconds after the impact.

Were these spooks invisible ninja?

Mr Smoketoomuch; you're an arrogant, egotistical dumbass.

If there is any fair moderation on this board this person will be warned.


Those pictures don't even show the cab.

Nice try.
 
No we don't plane on soliciting legal services from any regular jref posters.
Please tell me what I have lied or been cowardly about or retract your claim.

You are a coward because you refuse to do anything with your evidence to bring justice to the murdered people. Instead, all you do is anonymously post your BS on Internet forums. You are a pathetic coward. You are spitting on the graves of those who died.
 
You are a coward because you refuse to do anything with your evidence to bring justice to the murdered people. Instead, all you do is anonymously post your BS on Internet forums. You are a pathetic coward. You are spitting on the graves of those who died.

Moderator? More warnings please.



We have explained numerous times how the information was just obtained.

We are currently in the process of compliling the information in a presentable format.

In the mean time we are informing the movement that we have the information and will be releasing it as soon as possible.

JREF should feel priviledged that we extended that courtesy to you as well.
 
Moderator? More warnings please.



We have explained numerous times how the information was just obtained.

We are currently in the process of compliling the information in a presentable format.

In the mean time we are informing the movement that we have the information and will be releasing it as soon as possible.

JREF should feel priviledged that we extended that courtesy to you as well.

I also read your smug quotes about your interviewees on screw loose. You began by assuming many of them were lying or at least no telling the whole truth.

Deceitful hypocrite just about sums you up.
 
Question: What makes you so confident in your evidence that you conclude that all the known eyewitness tesimony was lies and all the known physical evidence was staged?

How do you know your new evidence is not faked/planted/lies/manipulation/misintepretation?

Where did I claim this?

Most witnesses are telling the truth exactly as they remember it.

But I wouldn't be a very good critical thinker if I were to investigate a 9/11 conspiracy and not consider the possiblity that SOME of the witnesses were planted.

You will be able to determine for yourself if you believe the evidence we present has been planted.
Let me rephrase the question, then:

What makes you so confident in your evidence that you conclude that all the known eyewitness tesimony was lies and all the known physical evidence was staged?

How do you know your new evidence is not faked/planted/lies/manipulation/misintepretation?
 
Other than digging up more personal information on me to attack the messenger....you guys have two choices in preparation for the release of our info:

1. Demonstrate how it is possible for a plane to fly on the north side of the citgo station and still cause all of the documented physical damage.

2. Prepare to call out multiple honest eyewitnesses with impeccable credentials as liars.

Good luck!:D
 
The saddest thing about all this, is that when they are proved incorrect, unlike the person who yells "fire" in a theatre, these people (Lyte/S4S) will be let off scott free. Not even so much as a warning. It would be true justice, that when these guys are proven incorrect, someone lay a libel or slander suit on their asses.

TAM
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom