Lyte Trip, are these your words?If so, would you please elaborate?
I believe that was sarcasm!
Lyte Trip, are these your words?If so, would you please elaborate?
along those lines, these fools really are stupid. I mean if they have evidence that the evil PNAC group caused 9/11. Hard, indisputable proof, should they be bragging about it days before its release. That allows the men in black an aweful lot of time to hunt you guys down...tsk tsk tsk...poor planning indeed.
TAM
Just so I'm clear on what Lyte etal are claiming as I've arrived late to this party:
The government flew some sort of plane flew over the north side of the gas station while at the same time another object was flying in from the southwest. As the UFO flies over the highway, lightpoles are somehow torn from their bases in a pattern that mysteriously doesn't coincide with the plane. At the exact moment the UFO strikes the pentagon, the plane magically disappears and dozens of NWO lackeys immediately go about their buisness of scattering plane wreckage on the Pentagon lawn (Tuesday was apparently "Bring Your Plane Debris To Work Day.") while at the same time brainwashing and/or paying off the witnesses to say they saw a plane crash into the building.
.... Is that about it?
Heh. Maybe they'll drag it out until April 1.Or this is all just hype to drive Dylan insane, ever since they parted ways. They know he reads these forums, and would go out of his mind if they had evidence they would not share with him for LC:FC.
TAM
False dichotomy. They don't have to be liars
(Tuesday was apparently "Bring Your Plane Debris To Work Day.") while at the same time brainwashing and/or paying off the witnesses to say they saw a plane crash into the building
Sounds ◊◊◊◊◊ crazy, no? And best part is, they don't have to proof what happened to the passengers, crew and plane of AA77. The gummit must do so (allthough I thought they allready did).
Lyte Trip, are these your words?If so, would you please elaborate?
Or this is all just hype to drive Dylan insane, ever since they parted ways. They know he reads these forums, and would go out of his mind if they had evidence they would not share with him for LC:FC.
TAM
Hey man, maybe you should ask your goverment about all that (or apparently the Dutch gov't will work just as well). All we know is that there's 100% beyond a reasonable doubt rock solid signed in blood irrefutable proof that the flight path is wrong. How they faked the rest and why, what happened to flight 77, what the UFO was, what caused the explosion, etc.--those are all beside the point. Don't you get it?Just so I'm clear on what Lyte etal are claiming as I've arrived late to this party:
The government flew some sort of plane flew over the north side of the gas station while at the same time another object was flying in from the southwest. As the UFO flies over the highway, lightpoles are somehow torn from their bases in a pattern that mysteriously doesn't coincide with the plane. At the exact moment the UFO strikes the pentagon, the plane magically disappears and dozens of NWO lackeys immediately go about their buisness of scattering plane wreckage on the Pentagon lawn (Tuesday was apparently "Bring Your Plane Debris To Work Day.") while at the same time brainwashing and/or paying off the witnesses to say they saw a plane crash into the building.
.... Is that about it?
![]()
For a member of a board that masterbates all day long with sarcasm your ability to recognize it when it's actually used in an appropriate and witty fashion is sorely lacking!
Psht. You and your shill "logic".Exactly, all it takes would be to not know which way north really was, its more of a case of spatial disorientation.
I'm inclined to think that due to the way that 395 runs through the area, that most people when asked which way north is, they would answer that north was to the side the official flight path is.
Looks like these CTers aren't at all sure of their supposedly earth shattering evidence, after all, and they're here trying to ascertain what objections might be made to their nonsense in advance. What other reason for them to be here posting "hypothetical" questions in advance of their latest woo theory?
It appears that they realize that they have zero credible and zero meaningful or credible evidence and that they are hoping to goad skeptics and critical thinkers into giving them pointers on what they need to address to make their arguments sound, because they have no idea how to do so themselves.
It also appears that they are hoping for skeptics and critical thinkers to draw them a roadmap about how to present cogent and credible evidence, which they do not have, in order to make them look less foolish and less idiotic than they already appear.
I say, leave them to their own devices, and continue to ask them to present their alleged "evidence" which they seem oh, so, reluctant to do thusfar. I think they know that it won't stand up to scrutiny.
Other than digging up more personal information on me to attack the messenger....you guys have two choices in preparation for the release of our info:
1. Demonstrate how it is possible for a plane to fly on the north side of the citgo station and still cause all of the documented physical damage.
2. Prepare to call out multiple honest eyewitnesses with impeccable credentials as liars.
Good luck!![]()
Why are Lyte Trip and some others here? I believe LashL got it exactly right in this post. They are here to see which troof is dead in the water and which troof they can spin and run with.
Lyte, you've been parroting this mind-blowing, highly-explosively, new evidence since the beginning of November. We're now coming up on Thanksgiving, and you're still compiliing.We have never "parted ways" or had issues with Dylan.
He can be privy to any information that we have.
All he needs to do is ask.
Psht. You and your shill "logic".
Charming.![]()
For a member of a board that masterbates all day long with sarcasm your ability to recognize it when it's actually used in an appropriate and witty fashion is sorely lacking!