[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[chipmunk stew]

This devastating evidence wouldn't have anything to do with this, would it?

http://www.pilotsfor911truth.com/

 

[Lyte Trip]

Here is what I acknowledge, S4S:

If (get that "If"), it is proven to me (which means witnesses with signed testimony, FDR data verified independently by a trusted source proving a north side flight path), than what I would acknowledge is that there is evidence that the official story got the flight path wrong for the crash of AA77.

John with red socks versus John with green socks, and nothing more.

TAM

Which simply demonstrates that you just don't get it.

The ASCE report outlines the damage to the inside of the building in detail.

Each damaged column is documented.

There is zero room for error on the part of the official story in regards to the flight path.

The physical damage starts with the light poles; but leading all the way up to the odd C ring exit hole......it can only have been created from a plane impacting the building at a sharp angle coming from the southwest.

All of these images are from the ASCE report.

John's socks can only be red.

If they are any other color he has been busted.

 

[DavidJames]

I just returned with the info. We are working to compile and present it as soon as possible.

Beside making a video, what do you plan on doing with this information? Will you try and bring justice to bear on the "perps". Here is a thread where a lawyer has offered to assist.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=67599

 

[Lyte Trip]

This devastating evidence wouldn't have anything to do with this, would it?

http://www.pilotsfor911truth.com/

No.

But that supports it.

Have you not been reading the thread?

 

[maccy]

If you want to get an idea of who good Lyte and his fried are at assessing evidence, see the PROOF of the FACT that the NWO is messing with their phone:

Lyte Trip and I are in possession of some very explosive detailed and documented information and evidence on the Pentagon.

Every time I speak with him on the phone on the subject, it sounds like someone is picking up another line in the house and pressing one button, then the redial button sequence.

This has happened multiple times.

Plus strange clicking, like someone picked up the other line, then hangs up.

The clicking sometimes happens any time I speak with anyone regarding the Pentagon info since this new evidence has arrived.

Please be aware that neither of us will commit suicide and will drive extra careful.

And all the information we have has already been presented, but now will be documented.

Please stay tuned and pray for us.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=604

----------

And, because it bears repeating:

Did you see the gorilla?

 

[Bell]

Sooo... anywoo...

1.) What happened to AA77, it's passengers and it's crew? Where are they now?
2.) What knocked over the lightpoles?

Like any of those two cowards are going to answer this...

 

[T.A.M.]

arguing with you or S4S over evidence you have not presented is just silly, so I am going to pull myself out of the silliness and just wait to see what you bring.

Some how I think it will be all proven false, but that is just my SPECULATION.

TAM

 

[Kent1]

Which simply demonstrates that you just don't get it.

The ASCE report outlines the damage to the inside of the building in detail.

Each damaged column is documented.

[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/ASCEdamagepath.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/ASCEFigure7.gif[/qimg]

There is zero room for error on the part of the official story in regards to the flight path.

The physical damage starts with the light poles; but leading all the way up to the odd C ring exit hole......it can only have been created from a plane impacting the building at a sharp angle coming from the southwest.

All of these images are from the ASCE report.

[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/ASCEflightpathwithobjectslabeled.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/ASCEFigure3.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/ASCEFigure3-1.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/ASCEsatellitegraphicwithplaneapproa.jpg[/qimg]


John's socks can only be red.

If they are any other color he has been busted.

So then why do we see the damage path into the Pentagon at angle?
And where did your Pentagon plane damage path go?

Oh and whats the source of the Bush document. What does it say?

 

[bonavada]

i'm new to this thread. but i have to ask, if the plane flew a different trajectory to the officially recognised one, what caused the damage to the lamposts? (and generator?)
sorry if it's been asked before.
confused
BV

can you answer this please lyte?

BV

 

[Mashuna]

If you want to get an idea of who good Lyte and his fried are at assessing evidence, see the PROOF of the FACT that the NWO is messing with their phone:



http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=604

----------

That's so funny. Everyone knows that you don't get funny noises or redial beeps when the NWO mess with your phone. The first you know about it is when the black helicopters arrive.

Unless the NWO operative is your little brother listening in on the other line.

Or you're just not very good at using a phone, and keep accidentally pressing the redial button while you speak.

 

[maccy]

If lyte doesn't talk about his lightpole staging theory here, you can always read his thread about it on the LC Forums:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=78

 

[Lyte Trip]

I encourage everyone who wants a laugh to visit Lyte Trip's MySpace page.

Surprise surprise.

Gravy ignores the topic of the thread and uses his special debunko powers to dig up info on a poster to attack the messenger!

Go figure.

And what does he find?

lo and behold.......a 9/11 truth activist says that he believes 9/11 was an inside job!




That entire blog about our first trip was posted in the LC forums when we first returned.

I am not ashamed of anything I have posted.

Did I directly call anyone an agent? Nope.

Did I consider the possibility? You better believe it.

That is called critical thinking. Unlike you so called skeptics (pseudoskeptics) that take everything at face value and swallow the official story hook line and sinker.

I will give all witnesses the benefit of the doubt and assume they deduced information or were manipulated rather than straight up lied when their claims contradict the evidence.

But naturally if we are correct about the final flight path of the plane then SOME had to be lying.

Exactly which ones we can never know for sure so we'll leave it at that.

But it all boils down to this.....

If you can't demonstrate how the plane flew on the north side of the citgo station and still caused all the physial damage....

You will be forced to admit that the damage was staged and therefore 9/11 was an inside job.

Dig up all you want on me.

I will be going 100% public with this information because I know for a fact that it will stand up to all scrutiny.

 

[Lyte Trip]

can you answer this please lyte?

BV

They were staged.

 

[JFM]

No.

But that supports it.

Have you not been reading the thread?

That anim' shows one of the worst pieces of flying I've ever seen. Why do loons keep on saying it was skillfull?

 

[Lyte Trip]

arguing with you or S4S over evidence you have not presented is just silly, so I am going to pull myself out of the silliness and just wait to see what you bring.

Some how I think it will be all proven false, but that is just my SPECULATION.

TAM

I'm glad you at least acknowledge that.

Now that you have a firm grasp on the implications of what we are claiming......I am certain that you will be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the information we present will validate our claims.

 

[Lyte Trip]

Sooo... anywoo...

1.) What happened to AA77, it's passengers and it's crew? Where are they now?
2.) What knocked over the lightpoles?

Like any of those two cowards are going to answer this...

You better start asking your government this because when we demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt how the plane flew on the north side of the citgo it will have established definitively that what you were told happened to the light poles and flight 77 simply isn't the case.

 

[bonavada]

this isn't funny though.

Father Stephen McGraw is a prime candidate for a deep cover agent. What could possibly be a more cush job that would leave you plenty of time for clandestine covert operations than a priest?

the attack on this good man's credibility and integrity was appalling. after being welcomed into the company of Father McGraw they proceed to snidely try to devalue and destroy his testimony of what he witnessed that day.
Does lyte + co truly believe that he is lying about when he ministered to the badly wounded and dying? Obviously it seem's so and for that they are no better than cockroaches.

BV

 

[Bell]

They were staged.

When? After whatever in your opinion hit the Pentagon? While dozens of people were watching the scene? They calmly put the lightpole on the hood of the taxi: "Walk along! Nothing to see here!"

 

[chipmunk stew]

<snip>
I will give all witnesses the benefit of the doubt and assume they deduced information or were manipulated rather than straight up lied when their claims contradict the evidence.

But naturally if we are correct about the final flight path of the plane then SOME had to be lying.

Exactly which ones we can never know for sure so we'll leave it at that.

But it all boils down to this.....

If you can't demonstrate how the plane flew on the north side of the citgo station and still caused all the physial damage....

You will be forced to admit that the damage was staged and therefore 9/11 was an inside job.

Question: What makes you so confident in your evidence that you conclude that all the known eyewitness tesimony was lies and all the known physical evidence was staged?

How do you know your new evidence is not faked/planted/lies/manipulation/misintepretation?

 

[Bell]

You better start asking your government this because when we demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt how the plane flew on the north side of the citgo it will have established definitively that what you were told happened to the light poles and flight 77 simply isn't the case.

It's not MY government, I'm from the Netherlands. You know, of queen Beatrix, NWO leader.

Anywho, I've asked YOU. AA77 did not hit the Pentagon? Then where is it? Where are the passengers? The crew? Did you inform their families about the evidence you have that proves their loved ones did not die in a fiery crash at the Pentagon?