MaGZ: There were no missiles, here is proof.

Face it, MaGZ - you've basically been duped by a white-power organisation with an agenda; an agenda to convince people Jews are evil, no matter what evidence they need to concoct to go about their dissemination. I doubt even the author of that NV piece believes it; he just knows that it will help fool people into lazy racism - the real goal of the NV movement.

Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?
 
MaGZ said:
This is the only photo I have of the missile.
http://www.public-action.com/911/psyopnews/Extra/3/flash91.htm
Click to expand...


You're making less and less sense. If we are to believe these pictures, that black object (which was recorded by none of the hundreds of other cameras trained on the twins, mind you!) passed either between the towers, or behind them. Do you realize the scale here, MaGZ? Do you realize that if that object passed behind any of the two towers, it would be about as big as a jet fighter? Do you really believe that no one would have noticed a huge black form going through the sky and hitting a building? No?
 
MaGZ said:
This photo shows the fire starting on the 14th floor of WTC 7. Do a close-up and you will see the burning glow from the fire.

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc23.JPG
Click to expand...

If you count down the floors from the top, including 2 floors at the inset level, the 2 shafts of sunlight (or whatever they are) that are mistaken for fires, are on the 11th floor.

I'm assume WTC 7 is 47 floors.

Does the Penthouse count as a floor?
 
Last edited:
stateofgrace said:
You are joking, right?

Where is the vapor trail? You know the one that twists as the ¨missile¨ misses the plane and homes in on WTC 7?

Where is the second one?

You do realize that missile vapor trials don’t just go away instantly, they linger,bit like you and this stupid theory.

So to sum up, you have no witnesses, no vapor trails, no photographs, no video footage, basically jack to support your insane theory.

Well done Magz, you are a shining star, now head off and tell the rest of the world your super duper theory, hey maybe let NIST know , I’m sure those guys could do with a good laugh.

ETA, I did not ask for what you believe to be a missile, I asked for the vapour trails. You know the ones that would have been left by two missiles as they sped across New York.
Click to expand...

I don’t have a photo of the second missile but I can show you where it struck in the open parking area.
http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image8.jpg
The burning flame is where the second missile hit.
http://img431.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00105gh0.jpg
http://img431.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00054df9.jpg
Also download the NOAA Ground Zero satellite photo (large file) and you will see the large black circular crater where the missile hit.
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories/s798b.htm
Second white cloud from second missile strike (lower right)
http://911studies.com/911photostudies117a.htm
 
Lucas said:
You're making less and less sense. If we are to believe these pictures, that black object (which was recorded by none of the hundreds of other cameras trained on the twins, mind you!) passed either between the towers, or behind them. Do you realize the scale here, MaGZ? Do you realize that if that object passed behind any of the two towers, it would be about as big as a jet fighter? Do you really believe that no one would have noticed a huge black form going through the sky and hitting a building? No?
Click to expand...

The missile passed in front of the Twin Towers and the photo was taken by Gedeon Naudet.
 
babazaroni said:
If you count down the floors from the top, including 2 floors at the inset level, the 2 shafts of sunlight (or whatever they are) that are mistaken for fires, are on the 11th floor.

I'm assume WTC 7 is 47 floors.

Does the Penthouse count as a floor?
Click to expand...

I think you are right, the fire appears to be near the 11th floor.
 
MaGZ said:
I think you are right, the fire appears to be near the 11th floor.
Click to expand...

And were there reports of fires on the 11th floor?

There were also the same anomalies on the 6th and 7th floor. That is one magical missile.

You can see these anomalies on other buildings as well.
 
Last edited:
MaGZ said:
I don’t have a photo of the second missile but I can show you where it struck in the open parking area.
http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image8.jpg
The burning flame is where the second missile hit.
http://img431.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00105gh0.jpg
http://img431.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00054df9.jpg
Also download the NOAA Ground Zero satellite photo (large file) and you will see the large black circular crater where the missile hit.
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories/s798b.htm
Second white cloud from second missile strike (lower right)
http://911studies.com/911photostudies117a.htm
Click to expand...
If a missle struck there, why is there only fire damage and no overpressure damage?
 
MaGZ said:
I don’t have a photo of the second missile but I can show you where it struck in the open parking area.
http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image8.jpg
The burning flame is where the second missile hit.
http://img431.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00105gh0.jpg
http://img431.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00054df9.jpg
Also download the NOAA Ground Zero satellite photo (large file) and you will see the large black circular crater where the missile hit.
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories/s798b.htm
Second white cloud from second missile strike (lower right)
http://911studies.com/911photostudies117a.htm
Click to expand...


NO, NO, NO.

This is not what I asked you for. Other people have already addressed your alleged missile damage so I will not repeat it.

Missiles leave very distinctive vapor trails when fired. Two,according to you were fired over New York. Thousands of people would have been wondering about.

Produce one, a single one that says they say two missiles speeding over New York. Produce one, a single one that saw two missile vapor trails over New York.

Produce a single photograph of these vapor trails, just one.
 
CurtC said:
Don't missiles usually contain high explosives that, y'know, blast things apart? Those cars have just been burned with fire. What is this, some kind of incendiary missile? Maybe it's a thermite missile!
Click to expand...

Once the missile hit the back row of vehicles (see NOAA Ground Zero satellite photo), the missile shrapnel hit these cars in the foreground and set them on fire. One car exploding nearby would cause a chain reaction of other cars catching on fire with exploding gas tanks. This would be a good explanation for those who heard a series of explosions that day.
 
So an F-16 shot at a jumbo jet with a sidewinder, missed and hit a parking lot? Aside from the direction and tracking problems, a 20lb warhead should have... well, left a modest crater in the blacktop and pushed a few cars out of the way.

Or are you suggesting that an air to ground missile was used, which would have created a BIG crater and blown the cars near the impact sight onto their roofs?

Neither theory is supported by your pictures, but I am a bit curious.
 
babazaroni said:
And were there reports of fires on the 11th floor?

There were also the same anomalies on the 6th and 7th floor. That is one magical missile.

You can see these anomalies on other buildings as well.
Click to expand...

The hot shrapnel from the missile that hit WTC 7 would have started fires on several floors of WTC 7 as well as starting fires in cars on Vesey St and perhaps fires in WTC 5.
 
I guess Maverick needs to head back to Top Gun for refresher training. Then we need to find parts of the missile, then backlog a bit to find out what jet it was fired from and find out the pilot who is soley responsible for blowing up a perfectly good building.

Yes, this is possible.
 
Seriously...this is the most INSANE and RIDICULOUS thread I've ever seen. MAGZ...I've looked at your pictures and have read your posts...and I'm convinced that you are completely wrong. I don't see fires in WTC7...I see the suns reflection or the reflection of sunbeams from another building. If you look at those images...at the very left you see reflections on the building...but you see fire in WTC7? Ridiculous. And missiles????? C'mon...next you'll tell me that Dolly Parton's tits brought the buildings down. Seriously...this is a truly insane and idiotic theory. You need to grow up.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
If a missle struck there, why is there only fire damage and no overpressure damage?
Click to expand...

I don't know what you mean by "overpressure damage."

Did you see the black circular crater behind the row of burnt vehicles in the NOAA satellite photo?
 
HyJinX said:
Seriously...this is the most INSANE and RIDICULOUS thread I've ever seen. MAGZ...I've looked at your pictures and have read your posts...and I'm convinced that you are completely wrong. I don't see fires in WTC7...I see the suns reflection or the reflection of sunbeams from another building. If you look at those images...at the very left you see reflections on the building...but you see fire in WTC7? Ridiculous. And missiles????? C'mon...next you'll tell me that Dolly Parton's tits brought the buildings down. Seriously...this is a truly insane and idiotic theory. You need to grow up.
Click to expand...

You are not being intellectually honest. I think you are seeing what you want to see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom