MaGZ: There were no missiles, here is proof.

[Lucas]

MaGZ, since you continuously annoy everyone by popping up in every single thread about WTC7, and disappear as soon as someone disproves you (e.g. Gravy), There is no choice but to publicly and openly humiliate you in a thread specifically done for that.

I'm not doing this because you're a truther. I'm doing this because you're a moron. Missiles at Ground Zero is a ridiculous theory, and it can be proven that it's completely wrong by showing you a single picture:

See this picture? This is the south face of WTC7, COMPLETELY INTACT DURING THE SOUTH TOWER COLLAPSE.

So, if the facing is intact, where the ◊◊◊◊ did your missile go, you intellectual coward? If you can't answer this simple question, if you cannot explain the picture that is right there in your face, then you cannot continue to annoy everyone with this idiotic theory. Get a real theory, and get a life.

 

[Mancman]

He's been shown this before. He ignores it. He needs help, simple as that.

 

[The Doc]

I don't see any missiles but I see a...

NUCLEAR EXPLOSION IN WTC7!!!

 

[Lucas]

Oh and just in case you'd think the pictures are photoshopped, here's a few other high-res pictures from the same site:
WTC7, intact while both towers are standing
Still intact when the south tower starts to collapse
So intact, the reflection of the collapse cloud is crystal clear
Oh looky, even after the south tower goes, still intact!
Ahh... This explain burning WTC7. Debris! Who'd a thunk it?
And just to finish up, look at this "minor" fire later in the afternoon.

So. Feeling stupid yet, you intellectual coward?

 

[Lucas]

He's been shown this before. He ignores it. He needs help, simple as that.

If he ignores this, it's just laughable.

 

[MaGZ]

MaGZ, since you continuously annoy everyone by popping up in every single thread about WTC7, and disappear as soon as someone disproves you (e.g. Gravy), There is no choice but to publicly and openly humiliate you in a thread specifically done for that.

I'm not doing this because you're a truther. I'm doing this because you're a moron. Missiles at Ground Zero is a ridiculous theory, and it can be proven that it's completely wrong by showing you a single picture:

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc40_small.JPG

See this picture? This is the south face of WTC7, COMPLETELY INTACT DURING THE SOUTH TOWER COLLAPSE.

So, if the facing is intact, where the ◊◊◊◊ did your missile go, you intellectual coward? If you can't answer this simple question, if you cannot explain the picture that is right there in your face, then you cannot continue to annoy everyone with this idiotic theory. Get a real theory, and get a life.

The missile struck on the 14th floor. It looks like the smoke covered the damage.

 

[Rich M]

That is 100% insane, you realise?

 

[Gravy]

The missile struck on the 14th floor. It looks like the smoke covered the damage.

False. The 14th floor is fully visible in the Zafar series of photos.

Your neo-Nazi CocoaPuffs are tasting bitter today, aren't they?

 

[ref]

If he ignores this, it's just laughable.

Welcome to the CT world. This is their intellectual standard.

 

[volatile]

The missile struck on the 14th floor. It looks like the smoke covered the damage.

How hard would it be, really, to say "Oh. Wow. Thanks for pointing that out. Looks like I was wrong after all".

Swallow your pride, MaGZ.

 

[Lucas]

The missile struck on the 14th floor. It looks like the smoke covered the damage.

Oh, you're blind, and you can't count, either?

I see a total of 37 visible floors, from the top down. 14th floor is intact. And even if you say "oh it was the 7th floor sorry", that's only because you're trying to hide behind a your facade of illusions and lies and cannot face the fact that you are an intellectual coward and you cannot admit that you're wrong.

 

[a_unique_person]

Magz

i half suspect the reason you come here is to have the ideas you have been told disproved. Why would you hang around otherwise. You have plenty of evidence, just go with it. That's the rational response. You aren't psychotic like Christophera, use your powers of reason and logic.

 

[Lucas]

Hey MaGZ, just so you know, even pdoherty76 has admitted he was wrong on something. Can you be a man and do the same?

 

[MaGZ]

This photo shows the fire starting on the 14th floor of WTC 7. Do a close-up and you will see the burning glow from the fire.

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc23.JPG

 

[volatile]

This photo shows the fire starting on the 14th floor of WTC 7. Do a close-up and you will see the burning glow from the fire.

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc23.JPG

Doesn't your whole thesis rest on a whacking great missile hitting the building, not on there being a fire in the building? There is NO EVIDENCE in those pictures of missile damage.

We know there was a fire in the building - that's what caused the damn thing to collapse.


MaGz, dude, give it up. Please. Just, y'know, admit you're wrong.

 

[MaGZ]

Again, another excellent photo showing the fire on the 14th floor.

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc38.JPG

 

[volatile]

Again, another excellent photo showing the fire on the 14th floor.

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc38.JPG

Doesn't show the damage caused by a missile strike though, does it?

 

[MaGZ]

Doesn't your whole thesis rest on a whacking great missile hitting the building, not on there being a fire in the building? There is NO EVIDENCE in those pictures of missile damage.

We know there was a fire in the building - that's what caused the damn thing to collapse.


MaGz, dude, give it up. Please. Just, y'know, admit you're wrong.

The missile started the fires in WTC 7. How else could they have started?

 

[Mashuna]

The missile started the fires in WTC 7. How else could they have started?

This is great. I've been looking for a good sig for ages, I'm going to have to go with this one.

 

[volatile]

The missile started the fires in WTC 7. How else could they have started?

You saw those two massive, burning skyscrapers fall a block or so away, right?