MaGZ: There were no missiles, here is proof.

[MaGZ]

Doesn't show the damage caused by a missile strike though, does it?

It shows a fire burning in WTC 7 when WTC 2 collapsed.

What is your explanation?

I gave you mine. The missile strike started the fire.

 

[stateofgrace]

Magz,

You really are a discredit to the truth movement. There are guys that come here who really are genuine truth seekers, genuinely want to know the truth about what happened that dreadful day. They genuinely have a point of view and have genuinely backed it up with thorough research and are generally well mannered with what they say. These guys are confident in their beliefs and equally so are able to say when they are mistaken. I may not agree with them but I will accord them something you will never get that being the grace to listen to what they have to say. You neither seek the truth nor want it.

So let’s look at the utter insanity of what you are saying.

According to you, two highly trained, highly professional US air force pilots who happened to be flying over New York fired off two missiles at a commercial aircraft full of innocent people. These missiles, which presumably were heat seeking, not only missed the aircraft but missed the massive fireball it produced when it hit the Tower. They then went on to hit another building, which presumably was also full off innocent people, again nobody noticed.

You are completely and utterly wrong, please do the right thing and admit it, move on, fixate on something else, like I said your brand of insanity simply discredits any form of rationality that genuine truth seekers produce.

 

[Mashuna]

It shows a fire burning in WTC 7 when WTC 2 collapsed.

What is your explanation?

I gave you mine. The missile strike started the fire.

My explanation is that the invisible fire pixies started it.

 

[volatile]

It shows a fire burning in WTC 7 when WTC 2 collapsed.

What is your explanation?

I gave you mine. The missile strike started the fire.

There was an enormous burning skyscraper throwing out huge chunks of burning material, right next door. You saw that, right?

 

[twinstead]

It shows a fire burning in WTC 7 when WTC 2 collapsed.

What is your explanation?

I gave you mine. The missile strike started the fire.

It's from debris from the other building. That's mine.

So. Who has more evidence for their theory?

 

[MaGZ]

It's from debris from the other building. That's mine.

So. Who has more evidence for their theory?

So are you saying the crash of Flight 11 into WTC 1 caused fires to start on WTC 7 near the 14th floor?

 

[volatile]

So are you saying the crash of Flight 11 into WTC 1 caused fires to start on WTC 7 near the 14th floor?

Are you saying that magical fire pixies started a raging inferno in the laundry chute?

 

[JAStewart]

So are you saying the crash of Flight 11 into WTC 1 caused fires to start on WTC 7 near the 14th floor?

It played part in as much as it was one of the causes of the collapse of one of the twin towers.

The plane didn't start the first in WTC7, the collapse did.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Here is a blow-up of that part of the picture.

1) Does it look like fire? Where is the smoke?

2) Start counting, which floor is it on? (Hint= less than tenth).

Hans

 

[MaGZ]

Magz,

You really are a discredit to the truth movement. There are guys that come here who really are genuine truth seekers, genuinely want to know the truth about what happened that dreadful day. They genuinely have a point of view and have genuinely backed it up with thorough research and are generally well mannered with what they say. These guys are confident in their beliefs and equally so are able to say when they are mistaken. I may not agree with them but I will accord them something you will never get that being the grace to listen to what they have to say. You neither seek the truth nor want it.

So let’s look at the utter insanity of what you are saying.

According to you, two highly trained, highly professional US air force pilots who happened to be flying over New York fired off two missiles at a commercial aircraft full of innocent people. These missiles, which presumably were heat seeking, not only missed the aircraft but missed the massive fireball it produced when it hit the Tower. They then went on to hit another building, which presumably was also full off innocent people, again nobody noticed.

You are completely and utterly wrong, please do the right thing and admit it, move on, fixate on something else, like I said your brand of insanity simply discredits any form of rationality that genuine truth seekers produce.

I have never suggested the fighters just happened to be flying over NYC. They were sent there from Otis Air National Guard Base and flew at supersonic speed to get there.
As far a heat seeking missiles go–I don’t know–perhaps they were another type of missile.
I think this article is well researched.

The Missiles at Ground Zero
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/printer.php?id=10058

 

[Quad4_72]

Anyone ever wonder what people like Magz look like in real life? I have trouble imagining it, but I know that it must not be pleasant.

 

[JAStewart]

is MaGZ the only nutbar who believes this crap? if so.. hahaha

 

[JAStewart]

are there any missile witnesses from WTC7? There were people in there on 9/11.

 

[Flo]

I have never suggested the fighters just happened to be flying over NYC. They were sent there from Otis Air National Guard Base and flew at supersonic speed to get there.

What ? Not from Tel Aviv ?

 

[twinstead]

I think this article is well researched.

I'm sure you do

 

[MaGZ]

Here is a blow-up of that part of the picture.

1) Does it look like fire? Where is the smoke?

2) Start counting, which floor is it on? (Hint= less than tenth).

Hans

Yes, it does look like a fire. Perhaps I was wrong on which floor the missile hit. Firemen said they saw a large hole with smoke coming from the 14th floor.

 

[volatile]

National Vanguard? The holocaust-denying, white-power racist scumbags? The same group that went to New Orleans after Katrina hit and tried to give aid only to white people?

From [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Vanguard_%28American_organization%29]Wikipedia[/url]:

According to the group, "persons of Jewish descent, homosexuals or bisexuals, criminals, persons with a non-White spouse or sexual partner, or persons with more than an undetectable trace of non-White ancestry are specifically barred from National Vanguard membership."

You realise this is the same organisation that advocates that white people pretend to be Jewish whilst acting obnoxiously in order to stir up hatred of the Jews? You don't think this could be more of the same type of false reporting designed to inflame anti-Semitic, racist sentiment for an ideological (and not empirical) end? You get your information from them? You wouldn't take something spat out by a reprehensible, ridiculous ideology like that with just a little pinch of salt?

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

False. The 14th floor is fully visible in the Zafar series of photos.

Your neo-Nazi CocoaPuffs are tasting bitter today, aren't they?

 

[stateofgrace]

I have never suggested the fighters just happened to be flying over NYC. They were sent there from Otis Air National Guard Base and flew at supersonic speed to get there.
As far a heat seeking missiles go–I don’t know–perhaps they were another type of missile.
I think this article is well researched.

The Missiles at Ground Zero
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/printer.php?id=10058

Really? So what kind of missile were they then?

Those special none heat seeking anti aircraft missiles, that leave behind absolutely no missile vapor whatsoever?

Any chance you could produce an image of the two vapor trails left behind by the two missiles?

 

[Alt+F4]

Magz,

You really are a discredit to the truth movement.

I think Magz is a credit to the "truth" movement. Every crazy theory that someone comes up with only fractures them even more.

Keep up the good work Magz!