Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it's a little simple minded to call Loosers "terrorist supporters" because they don't even believe in the existence of these terrorists. In the mind of a CT, Arabs and other Muslims are more than happy to be the world's punching bag without ever fighting back; much like the Amish.
 
Do you suppose that maybe Hurricane Katrina was actually an experiment in gub'mint weather control??

It was part of a secret plot to create a false flag op and blame it on Cuba, justifying an invasion. They called it... "Northcopse". The US government paid weather scientists (what are they called???) to claim the hurricane originated in a lab in Cuba, however a few brave heroic whistleblowers unravelled the government plan by announcing the hurricanes were NATURAL. Of course, CTers kmmediately recognised how ridiculous it was to claim hurricanes were natural, thus they worked out that the government created the hurricane themselves! And thus the trooth movement was born! God bless America!

-Andrew
 
I think I could probably work a short questionnaire to "quiz" our friend johndoe to see if he's the genuine article. Since I dont feel like searching all 1,200 of his idiotic posts to get an idea of who exactly he claims to work for/what equipment he "flies", can anyone give me an idea of his claims in this regard?


He said this yesterday.

Im a CFI II MEI ATP. I dont offer my airline. I been in the business for 20 years.
 
He said this yesterday.

Im a CFI II MEI ATP. I dont offer my airline. I been in the business for 20 years

Translation: Heres a bunch of jargon you wont understand so you'll think I'm a pilot.

I've been searching his posts the last hour or so to see if there's anything I can hang him on, and I found that one too. I find it funny that he wont disclose his alleged employer. It cant be because of paranoia, because it takes an act of Congress to fire a pilot(unless they show up for work under the influence), so he must know that he could be easily exposed as a fraud if he encounters anyone who actually works for his airline....

That said, I think I've been able to deduce the only possible airline he could work for. In one post he stated he knew an airline crew from his company that saw the South Tower hit from Newark Int'l. He also said he knew several crews at JFK that saw it as well. In another thread he mentioned that he had to call a friend of a different airline for 757 information. There is only one US airline that doesnt fly the 757 that serves both Newark and JFK, namely JetBlue. This will make the quiz difficult because they fly an all Airbus fleet. Unfortunatly, I know next to nothing about Airbusses. I'll keep looking to see if he mentions anything that disqualifies JetBlue...that would leave him with no airlines left to fly for based on what he's said!
 
Since he probably reads this thread, I'll bet he's doing all the research he can on JetBlue...
 
Of course, CTers kmmediately recognised how ridiculous it was to claim hurricanes were natural, thus they worked out that the government created the hurricane themselves! And thus the trooth movement was born! God bless America!

-Andrew
The sad thing is, some CTs have actually argued this position.
 
After reading a bunch of his posts in the past couple of days, I'm convinced that johndoeX is a commercial pilot. All real pilots use "LOL" in at least every third sentence.
 
After reading a bunch of his posts in the past couple of days, I'm convinced that johndoeX is a commercial pilot. All real pilots use "LOL" in at least every third sentence.

Not just any commerical pilot, he's a veteran commercial pilot with 20 years and thousands of hours of experience...and yet he cant go one sentence without a "dude" "lol" "OMG" or even a "ROFL" in there somewhere.

Now I've just read thats he's never heard of pprune.org, which is only the largest professional pilot site on the internet with 100,000 members. He also thinks its suspicious that there are holes in primary radar coverage and he mistakenly referred to the secondary radar as Mode C, when its Mode S, and has been that way for like 10 years ..tsk..tsk.
 
Bwah! That didn't take long. But check this out. I've learned that when I see something of special interest on LC, to make a copy of it, because it may not be there for long. I just compared my copy of that "supporting terrorists" page to what's there now, and the mods certainly modified it.

In the exchange between johndoeX and samuelaspade, guess who made a threat? But guess who got banned?

Invite him over here, then!
 
After reading a bunch of his posts in the past couple of days, I'm convinced that johndoeX is a commercial pilot. All real pilots use "LOL" in at least every third sentence.


I think you guys are reading to much into it.

Did he say "I drive planes' at any time?

I think he "drives" them by pulling them around the runway with a tractor.
 
Not just any commerical pilot, he's a veteran commercial pilot with 20 years and thousands of hours of experience...and yet he cant go one sentence without a "dude" "lol" "OMG" or even a "ROFL" in there somewhere.
In another post he was talking about how much he was drinking that day. When questioned about that, he said even pilots get a day off. But I doubt very many drink to the extent he says he was, even on an off day.

Also, he posts on a site where people claim a large jet plane hitting the ground at a 75 degree angle under full throttle would leave large sections intact, including a full tail section. Seems a real pilot would know how silly that is.
 
In another post he was talking about how much he was drinking that day. When questioned about that, he said even pilots get a day off. But I doubt very many drink to the extent he says he was, even on an off day.
I'm sure some pilots drink like fish, but FAA rules and typcially harsher company rules make it difficult to drink with any kind of frequency. I believe the rule is 24 hours from bottle-to-cockpit, but I'm not 100% sure...

Also, he posts on a site where people claim a large jet plane hitting the ground at a 75 degree angle under full throttle would leave large sections intact, including a full tail section. Seems a real pilot would know how silly that is.
Very true, and real pilots have no problem with Hani Hanjours ability to steer a 757 into an 80 ft tall X 1000 ft wide building. Only the posers seem to have a problem with this(Nila Sagadevan most notably) for some reason.
 
From the Loose Change Blog.

7.05.2006
Go figure.

So, both Loose Change 2nd Edition and the September 11th, 2005 extra have been removed from Google Video. Strangely, the foreign versions are all intact.

Hmmm. Any thoughts?

POSTED BY DYLAN AVERY AT 7:35 PM *
One English-language version is still on Google, but you have to search a bit for it. The only version in the top 100 is in Korean, and it's #10! That explains why Mike at 911myths.com said a couple of days ago that in one hour something like 400 people downloaded my LC Viewer Guide, and he gave a link to a site in Korean where most of the downloaders came from.

The version linked from loosechange911.com is called "911 Cover Up" and was uploaded May 30, in the midst of their copyright problems.
 
I am getting a psychic vision: The Loosers will claim this removal is part of the government coverup!!! Give me Randi's $1 million dollars the second they do.
 
Jones talks up his mormonism, let's see if he walks as well.

Have you seen the PowerPoint presentation Jones used at the recent LA nutjob-a-thon, oops, I mean, conspiracy convention? I ran into it a few days ago by accident and foolishly didn't save a link, and now I can't hunt it down.

A good portion of the last half of that presentation links 9/11 to Mormon eschatology. I don't know enough about Mormonism to really criticize it, but I'd be very curious to hear what a fellow Mormon thought about it.

I suspect it's about as relevant to doctrinal LDS thought as his "scientific" investigations into 9/11 are to actual science.

If anyone has a link to that PPT file, I'd appreciate it.
 
Actually CTs will believe stories reported in the MSM so long as these stories seem to support their claims. For example, the "hijackers are still alive" claims are based on media reports from mainstream sources(incredibly outdated of course), and we are supposed to take that at face value(many of them will mention the articles without posting the actual thing). Of course if something is reported that contradicts their theory, then we CAN'T TRUST THE MSM!

Another example:

They LOVE the PBS Frontline special about the Cheney vs. CIA intel wars called "Darkside", but they are strangely silent about the John O'Neill piece I've linked them to numerous times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom