Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
You guys catch this yet?

http://www.911blogger.com/2006/07/sibel-edmonds-911-may-have-been-inside.html


Alex Jones: But even if they cut evidence out of reports, we have the clear evidence of Thermite in the buildings, we have clear evidence of C.I.A. insider trading, N.O.R.A.D. standing down, U.S. troops already massed in central Asia, Bush having the launch order two days before to attack Afghanistan. I mean, Sibel, when you put all that together-- I'm asking you personally-- where does all the evidence point?

Where the hell does he come up with this crap? We didn't have US troops massed in Central Asia even after 9/11.
 
How soon before this gets represented as "Sibel Edmonds: 9/11 Was Definitely an Inside Job, and I Have Proof (but I Have a Gag Order so I Can't Talk About It Any Further)"?

Anyone want to lay odds?

Or, "I have an astonishing proof, but unfortunately there is not enough room to include it here."
 
New thread over at LC. Think it's rather indicative of their preconceived mindset and how they simply refuse to believe the government wasn't behind 9/11.

Nothing to do with facts/science/etc....

They just don't wanna...

Edit: ... forgot the darn link.
Look at comment #12 in the article they link to, it's our buddy Chuck Sheen w/ his standard canned "check out the vids at universalseed" response.

The article doesn't mention at all whether or not the construction is all steel as opposed to steel and concrete. It doesn't look like he will simulate the structural damage also, nor if he will fill it w/ typical office equipment either. I don't know what he expects to prove like this.
 
But if you read the article, ( and I'll cut some slack to the prof. - it may well have been the idiot writer, or his equally idiot editor.)

" The Peruvian-born academic is one of a number of experts across the world who believes that the Twin Towers should have stayed up after they were hit by hijacked airliners on September 11 2001."

Somebody mention that the towers DID stay up after they were hit by airliners.

Context is everything - just like the Loosers who have no idea of the scale of the WTC.
 
Oh oh, Mrs. Edmonds spoke with EEEEVIL Alex Jones.

@XXX: Peer pressure is for kitten.

I really like you, Childlike. Kinda like whack-a-mole. You show up every now and then, get the crap beat out of you, and then dissapear for an indeterminate amount of time.

Well, at least you've got a cool name, a cute avatar and a nice, and accurate, description of your location. Now if only your posts had content.
 
budding scientists...not

Just went to the LC link posted above (sorry, too new to re-link it here yet). It says alot, when one of the responders says "Lets hope he proves the physics don't work."

If they were really seeking the "truth" which we know they really aren't, then the results are all that matters, regardless of what they prove or disprove.
 
I just happened to spot this name on a partial list Jenabell posted of the Scholars backing the "inside job" theory.

Jage Knepp (SM) Chemistry, Sociology, Stockholm University

Looks like someone gave them a joke name. It translates to Iam Nuts. :) Makes me wonder how authentic the rest of the list is.

/Hans
 
I just happened to spot this name on a partial list Jenabell posted of the Scholars backing the "inside job" theory.

Jage Knepp (SM) Chemistry, Sociology, Stockholm University

Looks like someone gave them a joke name. It translates to Iam Nuts. :) Makes me wonder how authentic the rest of the list is.

/Hans

Pwah!

:roll:

That's just rich.
 
We're approaching Icke terrority over on nineeleven.co.uk

Arkan_Wolfshade said:
DeFecToR said:
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Let me see if I understand where you are coming from, and please, correct me if I am mistaken; I don't want to inadvertantly start setting up a strawman argument.

You are grounding your arguments/claims on the base idea that Islamic/Muslim militants are an outgrowth, or at least backed by, US intelligence services. Therefore, any actions taken by said militants is at least condoned by, and at most orchastrated by, the US intelligence services. Is this an accurate summation?

Western intelligence. And Israeli. Either they are backing said terrorists or they carry out attacks themselves that are then blamed on said terrorists.
Take for example the two British SAS * who were caught in Basra dressed up as arabs with a car bomb waiting to go off.

There have also been numerous reports of US soldiers setting up false flag attacks across Iraq.

Thank you for the clarification.
 
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7186061015080818639




Can these guys be taken seriously or better phrased, can these guys be that stooopid?
http://loosechange911.blogspot.com/
They saw the limb they've been out on about FDNY and the "gag order", when a member of the FDNY explains to them that it is standard procedure to not talk to the press while in uniform.

Then, their Fireman does not exactly give them a ringing endorsment, yet that's what they hear.
Further evidence that the Loosers are drunk on their own myth.

Next entry Ol' Dylan is giving a movie plug "One of the best films and sequels I've seen in a very long time." This from a 22- 23 year old. Ahhh Dylan the old sage.

He still clings to the gold in the basement business by quoting a letter from "A. K" followed by:

"There were a few of my co-workers who died from lung disease from the poor air qualiity since 9-11.

What is the 1st edition?" (sic)

Again, hardly a ringing endorsement, and while the odds are that in the 5 years since, any number of construction workers have "died from lung disease" even the ones who never worked at ground zero.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom