I have a question...
Has anyone ever considered making our own video?
I don't mean a direct rebuttal to LC, I mean our own unique video documentary, in the same style as LC, In Plane Site, et al, but tracking actual events.
There are several reasons for this:
1) Visuals work better than text
2) We can get people to watch it and avoid pointless dialogue
and most important
3) Seems a lot of people don't accept the "official story" because it involves a lot of stuff they don't understand. They lack the skills to understand the specialist reports, and lack the time/patience/commitment to learn to understand them. As such they see much of the official story as "unexplained". Their own "common sense" fills in these blanks - this is the exact behaviour LC is taking advantage of.
I'm talking about a documentary that goes through step by step explaining what is happening, how, etc.
For example, if we take the WTC collapses...
We document at each step, using the same techniques as LC (video footage, websites, news articles, simple 2D/3D animations, Voice-Over) what happened. Example:
1) Plane crashes and related immediate events (severed supports, spread of fire, removal of fire-proofing...)
2) Various evidences of gradual failure and simple explanations/animations of what was causes them - floor trusses sagging, pulling in the building, etc
3) More imminent collapse info (such as report of floor collapses in South Tower via 911 calls)
4) Step-by-step progression of what a pancake collapse involves (explaining "squibs", the dust cloud, simple and effective comparisons "the collapse released as much energy as 10,000 bunker buster bombs" (or whatever...)
5) Demonstration of variations in estimated time of collapse
6) Demonstration of broad field of collapse damage on surrounding buildings
And so forth.
