Loose Change - Part III

[Belz...]

I hunt renegade Panda Bears for the CIA. I joined for the free hat.

Due to local and state jurisdiction, I am only able to hunt renegade Pandas in the United States protectorates and on Indian Reservations.

I joined because I have a binding contract with the CIA granting me ALL of their souls upon demise.

So far so good.

 

[Johnny Pixels]

Just out of curiosity, do any of you work for any US intelligence agency, either part-time or full-time?

I'm a double-agent (entendre class) for MI6 and the CIA, I've been camped outside Dylan Avery's house for the past two weeks, but I found his bush to be too uncomfortable to sleep in.

 

[kookbreaker]

I joined because I have a binding contract with the CIA granting me ALL of their souls upon demise.

So far so good.

Pandas don't have souls!

 

[sophia8]

Heh... that would be funny...

Incidentally... much has been made of the date...

I understand it was the UN International Peace Day

Any explanations put forward as to why the terrorists chose 9/11? Was it just a random day? (Attacks had to happen on "a" day...)

-Andrew

It was:
Ethiopia's New Year;
the feast day of St. Hyacinth;
the birth anniversaries of DH Lawrence, Herbert Lom Brian de Palma and Franz Beckenbauer;
the 30th anniversary of the death of Nikita Khrushchev;
4 years after the Scots voted for independence;
28 years after a US-supported junta overthrew the democratically-elected govenment of Chile;
79 years after a British mandate was declared in Palestine;
160 years after a regular commuter train started service between London & Brighton;
224 years after American troops led by George Washington were defeated by the British at the Battle of Brandywine Creek, in the American War of Independence;
292 years after the English defeated the French at the battle of Malplaquet.

Take your pick.

 

[MarkyX]

From the history channel document "The Hamburg Cell", it was a riddle involving a lollipop, a slash, and two sticks.

 

[realitybites]

Just out of curiosity, do any of you work for any US intelligence agency, either part-time or full-time?

You just had to keep asking questions, didn't you Mutt?

::Screws on silencer::

Was seriously hoping it wouldn't come to this....

 

[Mutton-Head]

...... but I found his bush to be too uncomfortable to sleep in.

Pixel, that's like... a... a triple entendre!

Ouch!

 

[Belz...]

Pandas don't have souls!

Not the pandas, Kook. The CIA employees.

Sheesh. I must already have yours.

 

[kookbreaker]

Not the pandas, Kook. The CIA employees.

Sheesh. I must already have yours.

I threw mine in the river on a dare when I was 11.

 

[Mutton-Head]

You just had to keep asking questions, didn't you Mutt?

::Screws on silencer::

Was seriously hoping it wouldn't come to this....

Hey, you have a silencer..

Because I can't buy those here.

 

[realitybites]

Here's hoping....

New thread over at LC. Think it's rather indicative of their preconceived mindset and how they simply refuse to believe the government wasn't behind 9/11.

Nothing to do with facts/science/etc....

They just don't wanna...

Edit: ... forgot the darn link.

 

[MarkyX]

A little bird told me this.

Someone is going to make a video debunking my subtitles...

http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=14655

Should I laugh or laugh harder? They claim I cite no sources, yet I said exactly in the beginning of the video to go to www.lolloosechange.co.nr

 

[Brainster]

A little bird told me this.

Someone is going to make a video debunking my subtitles...

http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=14655

Should I laugh or laugh harder? They claim I cite no sources, yet I said exactly in the beginning of the video to go to www.lolloosechange.co.nr

What's next, Screw the Screw the Screw Loose Change Video?

I have a strong suspicion this is going to turn out like that much-hyped debunking of Gravy's Guide to Loose Change.

 

[Gravy]

Gravy, I know this probably sounds impossible but I was thinking of making another video based on the Loose Change creators talk transcript. Problem is, your document doesn't specify at what time frame or the source.

I would have been more thorough if I thought someone might make a video of those quotes from the radio!

 

[MarkyX]

I would have been more thorough if I thought someone might make a video of those quotes from the radio!

ARRRRRRGG

You could've asked

 

[Belz...]

I threw mine in the river on a dare when I was 11.

So THAT's what it was.

 

[XXX]

You guys catch this yet?

http://www.911blogger.com/2006/07/sibel-edmonds-911-may-have-been-inside.html

Sibel Edmonds: 9/11 May Have Been Inside Job

In an interview with Alex Jones, Sibel Edmonds went further than she ever has before:

Alex Jones: I'm asking you-- I mean, clearly, where does the evidence point on 9/11?

Sibel Edmonds: Well, that is the whole point, Alex. They are not letting out all the evidence. And since we don't have it to this date. It is as I was telling you, the [unintelligible] Force has been all classified. They also had 35 pages-- and this is according to Senator Graham-- the most important evidence and information on 9/11 by the Senate and House Joint Inquiry that happened in 2002 classified and 5 years later everything about it is classified. And again, you are still having people who are gagged. So this already points out that they don't want the evidence out. And they are keeping the evidence out of the public--

Alex Jones: But even if they cut evidence out of reports, we have the clear evidence of Thermite in the buildings, we have clear evidence of C.I.A. insider trading, N.O.R.A.D. standing down, U.S. troops already massed in central Asia, Bush having the launch order two days before to attack Afghanistan. I mean, Sibel, when you put all that together-- I'm asking you personally-- where does all the evidence point?

Sibel Edmonds: The evidence points to a massive government cover-up.

And that raises the question of why. Now we can answer that in so many different ways and we can speculate, but as I said, the most important thing is to stay with the facts. Not the facts that the government claims to be the facts, but the facts that are absolutely undisputed.

Alex Jones: Sibel, what I'm asking you is, in your gut, do you think 9/11 to some extent is an inside job?

Sibel Edmonds: Well, again, as I am telling you, I'm trying to tell you is, I have all the evidence of cover-up. Now, who were the people behind this? And why? And how? We don't have a definite answer. As I said, we can come up with theories, we can come up with speculation, but they do not--I mean, in my opinion, they are not facts. But also what government has been giving us, again, I don't consider those a total--you know-- total truth or fact either.

Alex Jones: Would you be surprised?

Sibel Edmonds: No. I wouldn't.

Alex Jones: You wouldn't be surprised if elements or criminal elements or private contractors were involved in 9/11?

Sibel Edmonds: No, I wouldn't be surprised.

Alex Jones: So you wouldn't be surprised like many others, because of the evidence and the cover-up you've seen, if 9/11 was an inside job?

Sibel Edmonds: At this point, I'd have to say no, I wouldn't be surprised.

Alex Jones: Do you think the evidence is leaning towards that?

Sibel Edmonds: Well, again, considering the level of cover-up and the length at which they have gone to gag people and prevent information-- this information from coming out, I would say yes."

nice leading questions there, as you usually see on Alex Jones shows. Everyone has to buy into exactly what he does, and if they don;t he just keeps rephrasing the question until he gets some kind of an agreement.

So now every time you say that the 9/11 investigation should look more at what Sibel Edmonds has to say, it can be turned around into your support that 9/11 was an "inside job".

 

[realitybites]

You guys catch this yet?

http://www.911blogger.com/2006/07/sibel-edmonds-911-may-have-been-inside.html

Why do I picture Jones on his knees with his hands clasped, asking those questions? He's all but begging for her to even remotely agree with the phrase "inside job".

Now, I don't know much about Sibel, but from what I've heard she's kinda like the pawn both sides would like to have on their side.

What's telling is that Jones, through is unabashedly leading questions, seems to know that their side needs her much, much more.

 

[dubfan]

Now, I don't know much about Sibel, but from what I've heard she's kinda like the pawn both sides would like to have on their side.

She's worth knowing about on her own merits. Great article on her in Wikipedia. Hers is a very important story, but not (IMO) for the reasons Alex Jones thinks. She basically blew the whistle on an incredible amount of FBI mismanagement and incompetence, and it sure looks like she also got tangled up in some type of foreign espionage or double-agent situation as well.

 

[Gravy]

You guys catch this yet?

http://www.911blogger.com/2006/07/sibel-edmonds-911-may-have-been-inside.html

The fact that she did an interview with crackpot Alex Jones makes me wonder just how convincing her evidence of a coverup is.

I love this exchange (bolding mine):

Sibel Edmonds: And that raises the question of why. Now we can answer that in so many different ways and we can speculate, but as I said, the most important thing is to stay with the facts. Not the facts that the government claims to be the facts, but the facts that are absolutely undisputed.

Alex Jones: Sibel, what I'm asking you is, in your gut, do you think 9/11 to some extent is an inside job?