Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mutton, is it because you have painted yourself into a corner in both threads that you've started that now the only thing you found to do is to accuse people here of working for the US gorvernment?

That's real pathetic.
 
Pardalis said:
Mutton, is it because you have painted yourself into a corner in both threads that you've started that now the only thing you found to do is to accuse people here of working for the US gorvernment?

That's real pathetic.
Click to expand...

I'm not accusing, I'm asking. Working for an intelligence agency is not illegal, or wrong. I'm curious about the tenacity for defending the official 911 report. That's not illegal or conspiricy.
 
Gravy said:
Yes. I'm watching you right now. I think you put that strap through the wrong buckle.
Click to expand...

Hey Gravy, how come the absence from the Mineta thread? Can't handle sticking to real debating points?

Oh, and I'm not wearing any buckles

Ha!
 
Mutton-Head said:
I'm not accusing, I'm asking. Working for an intelligence agency is not illegal, or wrong. I'm curious about the tenacity for defending the official 911 report. That's not illegal or conspiricy.
Click to expand...

Show us indisputable proof that 9/11 was an inside job, then we'll talk.
 
Mutton-Head said:
I'm not accusing, I'm asking. Working for an intelligence agency is not illegal, or wrong. I'm curious about the tenacity for defending the official 911 report. That's not illegal or conspiricy.
Click to expand...
It's surprising that people support evidence, facts, and critical thinking?
Have you forgotten that this is a forum devoted to those things?
 
Mutton-Head said:
Hey Gravy, how come the absence from the Mineta thread? Can't handle sticking to real debating points?

Oh, and I'm not wearing any buckles

Ha!
Click to expand...
No, I've been busy on another forum with people who need even more help than you do! :)
 
Mutton-Head said:
Hey Gravy, how come the absence from the Mineta thread? Can't handle sticking to real debating points?
Click to expand...
You mean your debating points (quoted just as they appear on the page)?
False, and wrong, and illogical, and idiotic reply.

You guys are so stuck with this one. Go back to the Loose Change thread.

Amateurs

You got nothing.

Mineta shows that Cheney was involved, and it's just sticking in your throats.
Click to expand...

Sorry, M-H, blazing ignorance and childish abusiveness aren't complementary qualities. I'll be giving your posts a pass.
 
Blue Mountain said:
The most likely explanation I've heard was it was a beautiful clear day; no clouds at all over the eastern part of the States. Just what you need if you want to visually acquire targets on the ground.
Click to expand...
That was an absolutely clear day, pure blue sky. yet so sad... :(
 
Mutton-Head said:
I'm not accusing, I'm asking. Working for an intelligence agency is not illegal, or wrong. I'm curious about the tenacity for defending the official 911 report. That's not illegal or conspiricy.
Click to expand...
I started conversing with you back when you first arrived, because you had the grace to ask a perfectly sensible question regarding Sept. 11th. Seemed like you were an honest person who'd been fed the CT line, but had some reasonable doubts about their stories.

At this point, though, you're starting to look like a lost cause. Perhaps I should have given up some time ago, but I've always been an optimist.
 
Mutton-Head said:
Hey Gravy, how come the absence from the Mineta thread? Can't handle sticking to real debating points?

Oh, and I'm not wearing any buckles

Ha!
Click to expand...

Is it just me, or have CT'ers lately started to resemble John Nash in A Beautiful Mind? Recall that Nash became obsessed with finding meaning in random words printed in magazine articles. There were no real connections between the words, but Nash's unhealthy mind kept spawning them, insisting they had some overarching meaning and formed some huge hidden puzzle that only he could decipher.

Now look at some of the CT-related threads in this forum. Prescott Bush may or may not have consorted with Nazis...Bush Sr. may or may not have misrepresented the dates he was in the CIA...George W waited a few minutes before leaping into action when informed a plane hit the WTC...something about Mineta's testimony being off by a few minutes. Most people would look at these and consider them (even if true) unrelated bits of trivia, meaningless in the great scheme of things. CT'ers look at them as strong evidence for the greatest conspiracy of all time.

So I seriously wonder if that's what we're dealing with here: John Nash, minus the intelligence and creativity, and with a very large dose of immaturity added.
 
Last edited:
gumboot said:
I didn't sleep last night... for some reason I kept playing 9/11 stuff over in my head again and again...

I'm taking this way too seriously... :p

I have a question...

Has anyone ever considered making our own video?

I don't mean a direct rebuttal to LC, I mean our own unique video documentary, in the same style as LC, In Plane Site, et al, but tracking actual events.

There are several reasons for this:

1) Visuals work better than text
2) We can get people to watch it and avoid pointless dialogue

and most important

3) Seems a lot of people don't accept the "official story" because it involves a lot of stuff they don't understand. They lack the skills to understand the specialist reports, and lack the time/patience/commitment to learn to understand them. As such they see much of the official story as "unexplained". Their own "common sense" fills in these blanks - this is the exact behaviour LC is taking advantage of.

I'm talking about a documentary that goes through step by step explaining what is happening, how, etc.
Click to expand...

This has some interest to me, but perhaps the way to approach it is to break the movie down into component parts and have different people responsible for the individual segments. IOW, have one person (or group) responsible for the Pentagon, another for the WTC, and a third for Flight 93, and maybe yet another handling things like NORAD, etc.
 
Stellafane said:
Is it just me, or have CT'ers lately started to resemble John Nash in A Beautiful Mind? Recall that Nash became obsessed with finding meaning in random words printed in magazine articles. There were no real connections between the words, but Nash's unhealthy mind kept spawning them, insisting they had some overarching meaning and formed some huge hidden puzzle that only he could decipher.

Now look at some of the CT-related threads in this forum. Prescott Bush may or may not have consorted with Nazis...Bush Sr. may or may not have misrepresented the dates he was in the CIA...George W waited a few minutes before leaping into action when informed a plane hit the WTC...something about Mineta's testimony being off by a few minutes. Most people would look at these and consider them (even if true) unrelated bits of trivia, meaningless in the great scheme of things. CT'ers look at them as strong evidence for the greatest conspiracy of all time.

So I seriously wonder if that's what we're dealing with here: John Nash, minus the intelligence and creativity, and with a very large dose of immaturity added.
Click to expand...

Watch Who Killed John O'Neill when you get a chance--that guy's got the Nash routine down, complete with the wall diagram.
 
Pardalis said:
Yeah, the CIA is very big here in Québec. :cool:
Click to expand...
I enjoy believing that Pardalis actually is an adorable kitten in a black ninja hood. I knew the CIA loved recruiting Canadians, but I didn't know they'd gotten to the kittens as well! :boxedin:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom