Loose Change - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Loosers never fail to delight and amaze. This is about the LC screening at Parliament, which was/is supposed to happen today.

QUOTE (Barcoded @ Jun 14 2006, 03:04 PM)
I'd been waiting for this day for weeks now...

BUT I havent heard how it went or even if it happened? Did Mr. Meacher shown the flim?

If not, then what sort of threats must have been made upon him and his family I wonder to make him cancel the screening...

QUOTE TruthKey
Probably death.

If this screening has been cancelled by threat/intimidation, we have every reason to be enraged. It's time to rebel, my friends.
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6332&view=findpost&p=5310537

Stay tuned to this thread this evening. I'll have some very interesting reading material for you.
 
One other question, have we sourced the "10,000 gallons of fuel" info? From looking at Boeings site (among others), the capacity of the plane could have been as high at 28,000. It would depend on how much fuel was loaded and how much had been burned before impact.
The 767 has a fairly long range. They WTC planes only carried a fraction of their fuel capacity. Off the top of my head, it was 9-10k gallons.
 
The 767 has a fairly long range. They WTC planes only carried a fraction of their fuel capacity. Off the top of my head, it was 9-10k gallons.

I figured. The models they were were the ER rated, which can carry enough for trans-pacific, so I was pretty sure they were short-loaded. I didn't doubt the figure (it sounds reasonable, given the fully-fuelled range and the flight it was making that day), just wondered if we had it confirmed anywhere.
 
NIST says "about 10,000 gal of jet fuel were sprayed into multiple stories" - NISTNCSTAR1-5.
 
The Loosers never fail to delight and amaze. This is about the LC screening at Parliament, which was/is supposed to happen today.

QUOTE (Barcoded @ Jun 14 2006, 03:04 PM)


QUOTE TruthKey


Stay tuned to this thread this evening. I'll have some very interesting reading material for you.
6.14.2006

That's all folks.


Well, it's almost five O' clock in Great Britain. I have no clue if the Parliament screening went on as planned...apparantly Mr. Meacher's a little afraid for his life.

I'll update you guys as soon as I know what happened (if it happened...)

Still in the transition process. Our back orders are almost completely taken care of.

And that is all.

posted by dylan avery at 8:17 AM

http://loosechange911.blogspot.com/

I bet you're right, Dylan. It must be because Meacher is afraid for his life.
 
The Loosers never fail to delight and amaze. This is about the LC screening at Parliament, which was/is supposed to happen today.

QUOTE (Barcoded @ Jun 14 2006, 03:04 PM)


QUOTE TruthKey


Stay tuned to this thread this evening. I'll have some very interesting reading material for you.

I hope they do "rebel", that way they can be locked away and limits to their cancerous, disingenuous, mental masturbation can be imposed.
 
Honestly... Arguing in the LC forums is like being thrown into a large pool of stupid and being slowly dragged under the surface.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6260&st=60

CGI planes and blobs, OH MY!!!

Forgive my random, off-topic outburst, but... Their stupidity is awe-inspiring.

Yeah, poor LoonyBin is the sane one in this debate:

KillTown said:
Because extremely tall narrow buildings like the towers have to be demo'd top down, so that so they had to give a good excuse as to why the towers collapsed top down. They only wanted the WTC destroyed and nothing else.

Gerard Holmgren said:
4 giant planes on one day, and not a single piece of idenfiable wreckage from any of them.

Isn't that an amazing coincidence !

No, it's no coincidence, mate.

KillTown said:
LoonyBin said:
Last I checked this was the tallest building and steel structure to ever be demo'd. And it doesn't look like it came down from the top.

You are trying to compare a building that's 85 stories shorter???

Well, if the LARGEST is 85 "stories" shorter, how could you compare it to anything else ?
 
Yeah, poor LoonyBin is the sane one in this debate

Belz, "LoonyBin" is my LC handle over there. (I like to go incognito....) :cool:

And I think that's the last time I venture into the "alternative theory" section. The "regular" CTs are already cracked out beyond belief.

The alternative ones just flat out dumbfound you....
 
Couldn't possibly be that Dylan's film is so silly, so bad, and so childish, that Parliment has better things to do.

Nor could it be that you guys told yourselves another whopper and then believed it.

The real tragedy of Loose Change and the "Truth" movement is that there are some legitimate issues and errors and omissions that need to be addressed regarding 9/11. But the Loosers are poisoning their own well with all of the nonsense, errors, and illogic.

There's a serious case to be made that the Sibel Edmonds and Able Danger stories need broader public awareness. Same with John O'Neill. The public should know more about that guy. He should be a household name (though not for the reasons the Loosers claim).

There's a serious case to be made that more 9/11 materials should be released by the government. It strikes me as tragi-comical that Mike Williams (a Brit, bless his heart) has to file a FOIA request to get the radar tapes of the NYC airspace so he can clear up the Otis fighter timeline.

9/11 "Truth" could be focusing on these things -- but they're not. They've got the real issues all entangled with baloney like controlled demolition, wacky no-plane-hit-the-Pentagon theories, false flag ops, drones, etc., and because of that they are squandering their chance to really make a significant civic contribution.
 
Belz, "LoonyBin" is my LC handle over there. (I like to go incognito....) :cool:

And I think that's the last time I venture into the "alternative theory" section. The "regular" CTs are already cracked out beyond belief.

The alternative ones just flat out dumbfound you....

Yes, and for some reason I had you confused with someone else over there.
 
9/11 "Truth" could be focusing on these things -- but they're not. They've got the real issues all entangled with baloney like controlled demolition, wacky no-plane-hit-the-Pentagon theories, false flag ops, drones, etc., and because of that they are squandering their chance to really make a significant civic contribution.

Well, as mentioned, they ARE making a civic contribution, by contributing to their own sense of (civil) worth!!!
 
Oh. My. Ed.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6217&st=0

The level of credulity over there has gone past the "Staggering" level and is attaining "Elephantine" status.

I lost braincells reading that thread.

NOTE: Topic is Chemtrails, if you've already been there/done that. Nothing new.

It really is impossible for them to ever stop isn't it. Just when you think their lunacy has topped out, they kick it up a notch.

Their own one-up-manship is astounding.
 
9/11 was an inside job! BAM!

We never went to the moon!! BAM!

Chemtrails!! BAM!

And when we come back from the break I'll show you how David Icke has information unknown to mankind! Give it up for DJLegacy and the LC band!

*fade to commercial*
 
XXX, Arkan - GET OUT OF MY MIND!!!!!! ahhhhhhhhhhh.


OK, so I was going to post something along the same lines, have you 2 thought of going to the million?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom