Hyper Dimensional Design

[Daylightstar]

... the opportunities I have been given you and will continue to do so. ...

The only relevancy and opportunity you offer is the opportunity to learn the meaning of the word "irrational".
About your obnoxiously unsubstantiated irrational belief:

...
It's entirely irrelevant, a complete waste of time. Unless one wants to learn the meaning of the word "irrational".

It is indeed reasonable to expect you to continue in exactly the same fashion.

 

[Daylightstar]

That has been explained here in this thread, ...

^{Hilite by Daylightstar}
The 'it's over there" trick, where no such 'it' exists.
As documented earlier, I'll show you the posts, Dutch:
...

...
So, you appear to be a recidivist.

Sure I am at BAUT. ...

And here as well.

 

[Daylightstar]

That has been explained here in this thread, but since you don't actually read it.....

As it hasn't, why don't you give it another try:

... Why don't you mathematically explain the process of arriving at the claimed need to 'divide a time frame' by Pi twice ...

In the past I requested similar explanation from you:

Dutch,

Why π²? Why not π or π³ for example?
Please explain that for me.

An example of what I'm looking for:
Imagine calculating the volume in cm³ for a cube with sides measering 2 cm.
It is quite obvious why you calculate this volume with 2x2x2. 2 layers of 2 by 2 cm.

Now, why π²?

Never got the explanation.

 

[Dutch]

No the people that constructed the probes, launched them and crashed them (those causally related to those impacts) gave, even you, those lunar impacts. Pi gives nothing but the ratio of a circles circumference to its diameter. That you manipulate the value of Pi to get your two "Pi" point constants is given by no one and nothing but you.

But yet, this specific Pi correlation is there. I don't see the manipulation, its an intelligent correlation that shows up repeatedly

 

[Dutch]

You're not a circle either.

ETA:



A circle can’t manipulate anything, you can and do.

No. pi is just pi

 

[Dutch]

No Pi is not “the only constant in this case”.






As already stated neither of the two constant values you use for your “Pi points” are the value of Pi. You get those two constants by manipulating the value of Pi. Continuing to deny it won’t change then fact of what you have claimed you do.

It is Pi based. And Pi has a fixed value. And the 2 pi points on a timeline as described are based on pi. that's it. If they were based on another value I wouldn't call them Pi-points. get over it

 

[Dutch]

Again try some random constants, you only think it doesn't happen in your mind because you simply don't want to look at the information already available to you.

Again we have already been over the fact that with the exact same events and "correlations" one can come to a different conclusion about the message you perceive (we need to be in space and with nuclear power). The interpretation is only in your mind but you just seem to want to ascribe to some HDD entities also only in your mind.

No you try some random constants that come to your mind, follow the sunchronicities and share your findings with us. And do that consistently. You can't do that, because you will end up with nothing without delay

 

[dafydd]

But yet, this specific Pi correlation is there. I don't see the manipulation, its an intelligent correlation that shows up repeatedly

No, it's just events that you cherry pick after the fact, that's what I think. If you want to convince me then explain your method. You keep saying that the correlation is there but you never explain how you arrive at you conclusions. Show us your workings, we had to do that when I took algebra in school.

 

[Dutch]

You. Do you wish to deny your own intuition as well?

not at all, do you?

 

[dafydd]

you will end up with nothing without delay

Same as you then!

 

[dafydd]

not at all, do you?

My intuition tells me that HDD is total bollocks.

 

[Dutch]

You killed it instantly when you asserted no causal relation from your purported "design". It took awhile to get you there but you put that nail in the coffin.

You are talking about causal relations based on your limited perception of reality here.

If you stick with that, you will never get it. Doesn't make HDDesign less true

 

[Dutch]

No, it's just events that you cherry pick after the fact, that's what I think. If you want to convince me then explain your method. You keep saying that the correlation is there but you never explain how you arrive at you conclusions. Show us your workings, we had to do that when I took algebra in school.

The working is logged on the timeline

 

[dafydd]

The working is logged on the timeline

Then you will have no trouble with copy/pasting it here.

 

[Paul]

You look it up yourselves, don't make me do it.

Ooh, look over there, a shiny thing... Dutch runs away

I have done it before, takes me alot of time and than there's silence...and you go on with your remarks.

You mean remarks like "where's the method you keep claiming to have posted?"

It's there. period.

No comma it's not comma stop lying and just post the method full stop

 

[Paul]

So Paul, in your humble opinion, could you explain to me why exactly there must be adequate and repeatable methods in order to unveil the subject at hand?

That you even though about asking the question, let alone took the time to type it out and then press submit, shows the vast distance you need to travel in the search for a clue.

If it would be that easy, you wouldn't have born and this limited 3D reality woudln't probably not even exist.

It's very generous of you, but I'm pretty sure I'm not solely responsible for the existence of the universe.

One has minions you know.

Think about that.

No thanks, I have better things to do with my neurons; ECT for example.

Nevertheless, this specific pi-based underlying design seems to feel the need to show up with these significant events that are happening.

Strange how that only happens after you find something you want to be relevant and manipulate some numbers until it is.

just like that, instantly and repeatedly.

Just like that, after you've read about it and using random methods.

But you have to take some efforts in order to understand this,

So it doesn't just show up instantly then?

which is what you unfortunately refuse to do so

Yes, excuse us for not using the secret invisible method.

 

[The Man]

But yet, this specific Pi correlation is there. I don't see the manipulation, its an intelligent correlation that shows up repeatedly

But yet, your "specific Pi correlation is" based not on Pi but your simple mathematical manipulations of the value of Pi.

Just how many values does Pi have? Is it 0.449 or 0.551, perhaps 2.225
or 1.816.? Any of them Pi or are they just your manipulation of such as already mathematically laid out for you?

Two "Pi point" constants from one constant and you still claim your continued denial of manipulation is somehow "an intelligent correlation".

 

[The Man]

No. pi is just pi

So you can't or don't manipulate things?

 

[The Man]

not at all, do you?

Ah so you do know your intuition comes from you?

 

[The Man]

You are talking about causal relations based on your limited perception of reality here.

No, I'm talking about a specific lack of "causal relations based on your" explicit statements here. Would you like to revise those statements?

If you stick with that, you will never get it. Doesn't make HDDesign less true

One way or the or the other it still can't make your claims any less true.