Hyper Dimensional Design

[Sideroxylon]

Because Dutch is smart enough to try to avoid others getting a bead on what he does.

He knows that it if he honestly and openly presented any kind of system that it would be torn apart in the first page.

 

[The Man]

Because Dutch is smart enough to try to avoid others getting a bead on what he does.

He knows that it if he honestly and openly presented any kind of system that it would be torn apart in the first page.

Nope, most here have pretty clearly gotten a direct bead on what it is that Dutch does, so that part has certainly failed. That he simply refuses to accept what he has already said he does (and what he has said his purported "design" doesn't do) can hardly be considered as being, well, smart.

I seriously doubt Dutch has any kind of a system other then just being lead around by his intuition and feelings of being self-impressed. Certainly, as he has already asserted, he doesn't feel his purported "design" has any causal relation to the events he cites which of course means that even in his own regard it is all entirely just coincidental. Those facts he has honestly and openly presented but simply can not seem (or just refuses to) put them together himself.


Cognitive dissonance seems the most likely explanation and goes in line with his tenancy to simply attribute, what is admittedly by him, the results of simply his own intuitions (like we should stay out of space and not use nuclear power) to some perceived hyper dimensional entities. Everything is laid out for all to see by Dutch himself but ironically he's apparently the only one that still just can't see it.

 

[Sideroxylon]

That's true, Dan. I was thinking about Simpson's Corn God "Code" and the way it was taken apart so quickly. Yes, it has been made very clear that the idea of Dutch having any kind of system is a facade.


Happy New Year to all.

 

[The Man]

That's true, Dan. I was thinking about Simpson's Corn God "Code" and the way it was taken apart so quickly. Yes, it has been made very clear that the idea of Dutch having any kind of system is a facade.


Happy New Year to all.

Well the seems to be the difference, the ETCG guy seemed to have a system or methodology that he believed in (at least from what I hear) while Dutch simply seems to have a belief in his intuition not being his.

 

[Dutch]

Why don't you mathematically explain the process of arriving at the claimed need to 'divide a time frame' by Pi twice ....

That has been explained here in this thread, but since you don't actually read it.....

 

[Dutch]

You have failed to provide any valid indication whatsoever that you have 'specific knowledge' regarding any 'specific design'.
It is obvious that you believe that you do, but then again, you appear to be easily impressed and overwhelmed by the results of your brain not functioning correctly.

There's no reason at all why you wouldn't be impressed if you would have known about this specific Pi based design ( which has been explained here ) at the moment NASA announced these Grail impacts. You could have known that Deep Impact on comet Temple 1 first unveiled this specific Design. You could have known I have talked about lunar impacts before in relation to this specific Design. You could have thought to give these December 17 lunar impacts a closer look in relation to Deep Impact and you could have noticed the Pi-correlation instantly. Not once, but repeatedly.
I'm giving you the opportunity but you refuse to give it a look. That's a choice.
You don't, so that makes yous remarks worthless

 

[Dutch]

..... that doesn't mean that you discovered something.
By all accounts, it's just you, experiencing .... you.

You may think that Pi has different vallues, but I don't

 

[Paul]

That has been explained here in this thread, but since you don't actually read it.....

No it hasn't, you have been refusing to properly explain your method for years.

If you genuinely believe that you have explained yourself adequately then you are mistaken and we would all like you to post a clear, repeatable method for obtaining you results.

 

[Dutch]

I take it from your total silence on the issue, Dutch, that you are unable to place the large list of obvious dates onto the really important timeline.

Colour me entirely unsurprised.

Show it, explain the underlying Design

 

[Dutch]

What is so difficult about posting something like this: The interval between x event and y event is z. Pi is a factor of z because z/pi is this real number.?

That wouldn't be too difficult, you can do it.

 

[Paul]

You may think that Pi has different vallues, but I don't

You just think the number of decimal places varies as required and that as long as you say Pi you can do what you like to it afterwards.

 

[Sideroxylon]

That has been explained here in this thread, but since you don't actually read it.....

More posturing. That's all you have ever done.

 

[Dutch]

If your purported “design” isn't the cause of these events, as you assert, then it is, by that assertion, simply a coincidence. Again try just some constants at random and see what you get.

Pi gives me these lunar impacts, as many other correlations that are logged in the material. What do you get from some random constants? and stick with these constants consistently

 

[Dutch]

You are neither Peter Parker nor Spiderman

That's correct

 

[Paul]

Show it, explain the underlying Design

I'm not the on who claims there is an underlying design; that would be you.

I have given you a list of dates which must fit onto a timeline you say is important and express a theme which you claim is very important.

In the years since I first posted the list you have made no effort to explain you total inability to account for these dates.

 

[Dutch]

So are you just going to try to deny that you got your two constants by manipulating the value of Pi?

Pi is the only constant in this case and the value is fixed, as you might know.

I really don't understand why you talk about manipulating Pi. Do I give it a different value?

 

[Paul]

Pi is the only constant in this case and the value is fixed, as you might know.

What fixed value of Pi do you use?

I really don't understand why you talk about manipulating Pi. Do I give it a different value?

There seems to be a great deal that you do not understand, your own actions being an example.

 

[Dutch]

Because Dutch is smart enough to try to avoid others getting a bead on what he does.

He knows that it if he honestly and openly presented any kind of system that it would be torn apart in the first page.

well, torn it apart then. The Pi Design in relation to these lunar impacts is known so go ahead

 

[Dutch]

Nope, most here have pretty clearly gotten a direct bead on what it is that Dutch does, so that part has certainly failed. That he simply refuses to accept what he has already said he does (and what he has said his purported "design" doesn't do) can hardly be considered as being, well, smart.

I seriously doubt Dutch has any kind of a system other then just being lead around by his intuition and feelings of being self-impressed. Certainly, as he has already asserted, he doesn't feel his purported "design" has any causal relation to the events he cites which of course means that even in his own regard it is all entirely just coincidental. Those facts he has honestly and openly presented but simply can not seem (or just refuses to) put them together himself.


Cognitive dissonance seems the most likely explanation and goes in line with his tenancy to simply attribute, what is admittedly by him, the results of simply his own intuitions (like we should stay out of space and not use nuclear power) to some perceived hyper dimensional entities. Everything is laid out for all to see by Dutch himself but ironically he's apparently the only one that still just can't see it.

I remember that we have talked about this very same Pi based design in relation to the Deep Impact/Epoxi- Earth-Moon transit and comet Heartly 2 fly by's and you didn't buy it back than. Now it shows up again in relation to these lunar impacts and again you don't buy it.
The difference is that these correlations show up instantly out of nowhere.
And you could have seen it too if you had taken it serious.
That's the issue. You think it only happens in my mind but with the information already available to you, you could have come to the same conclusions. It's important to experience such a thing, otherwise your rigid mind will never open up

 

[Paul]

well, torn it apart then.

No need to do it again.

The Pi Design in relation to these lunar impacts is known so go ahead

For a novel value of known.