Daylightstar
Philosopher
No, your calculator is not in actual agreement with you.
Bonus content:
Well,Well,
my calculator agrees, so...
...
Anyone can make his or her calculator 'agree' with anything.
You can even make one spell out "boobies"!
No, your calculator is not in actual agreement with you.
Well,Well,
my calculator agrees, so...
...
Anyone can make his or her calculator 'agree' with anything.
You can even make one spell out "boobies"!
Are you nuts? What's the value of Pi that I use than?
...
Why don't you mathematically explain the process of arriving at the claimed need to 'divide a time frame' by Pi twice ....
...
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8887506&postcount=5943Dutch,
Why π2? Why not π or π3 for example?
Please explain that for me.
An example of what I'm looking for:
Imagine calculating the volume in cm3 for a cube with sides measering 2 cm.
It is quite obvious why you calculate this volume with 2x2x2. 2 layers of 2 by 2 cm.
Now, why π2?
Wouldn't that depend on the time it takes to impact?
Are you nuts?
Once again your "2 pi points " are based on values other than Pi.
What's the value of Pi that I use than?
Confirmation by Design.......
Spaceshuttles and lunar impacts..
Showing up after an intuitive thought I just had....
I thought Pi as expressed in our perception of time, that is based on 1 Earth year marking the both Pi points, should give confirmation so I decided to check....
Based on this specific Pi based calculation as used in HDdesign ( and HDDesign only)
365,25 * Pi * Pi = 3.605 days
December 15, 2012 creates a 3.605 days timeframe with February 1, 2003.......
On February 1, 2003, at the conclusion of the STS-107 mission, the Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrates during reentry over Texas, killing all 7 astronauts on board.
You can be as sceptical as you want, but fact is, that this HDDesign continues to show up these kind of intelligent correlations.
No one can make up just a story based on random constants with this kind of continued and repeated confirmation.
I am not going to argue with you about this, it's time you make up your mind
our alarming state of collective consciousness.
like the one you just did Daffyd, while I was posting
i don't think I have to explain that Pi isn't just a random number...it's basic mathematics.
The only difference is, that it's not applied on a circle, but on an orbit, expressed in our perception of time.

There's a first time for everything, I hope you used it wisely....made me think the other day.
Only if predetermined refers to post-dictional cherry picking.The timeframe around December 15, 2012, was pre-determined based on other elements of HDDesign
Or in reality world, not explained with no pattern and no connection to the US space program.as explained on the timeline, with underlying intelligent pattern as expressed by the space shuttles events.
You obviously didn't think much or you would have realised that most of the words in that sentence do not express an intelligently designed concept.I thought that the basic expression of this specifi Pi based design, that is with 1 earth year at both Pi points as repeatedly explained in the 'raw' hddesign material, should give somekind of confirmation.
Well done Dutch, you've managed to find more human tragedy to crow about.and it does, unmistakenly....
You seem to be doing just fine.No one can make up just a story based on random constants with this kind of continued and repeated confirmation.
Do you promise?I am not going to argue with you about this
OK, it's all nonsense.it's time you make up your mind
Only to yourself.i don't think I have to explain that Pi isn't just a random number...it's basic mathematics.
So explain to us what relationship Pi has with planetary orbits or time.The only difference is, that it's not applied on a circle, but on an orbit, expressed in our perception of time.
The only chance of that happening is if my premotor cortex decided to stage an intervention for my own sanity.If you are smart enough and sufficiently freed of rigid thinking, you should fall from your chair right now.
Nope, unfortunately I am in full possession of my faculties and able to read this post.That won't happen
You probably meant that to sound clever and insulting. Unfortunately for you, it is decidedly not the first and too pretentiously nonsensical to be considered the second.Instead, as an expression of duality in our 3D reality, we can expect some convulsion remarks, only giving credit to our alarming state of collective consciousness.
No one can make up just a story based on random constants with this kind of continued and repeated confirmation.
I am not going to argue with you about this, it's time you make up your mind
i don't think I have to explain that Pi isn't just a random number...it's basic mathematics.
The only difference is, that it's not applied on a circle, but on an orbit, expressed in our perception of time.
If you are smart enough and sufficiently freed of rigid thinking, you should fall from your chair right now.
That won't happen
Instead, as an expression of duality in our 3D reality, we can expect some convulsion remarks, only giving credit to our alarming state of collective consciousness.
What that means is anybody's guess.
This made me wonder about the etymology of the word fancy so I looked it up on etymonline. Turns out it is a contraction of fantasy.It seems the "collective consciousness" he imagines is in some state that apparently alarms him. Why he can't just imagine some other state is evidently beyond, well, him.
One thing I can never understand about some people dafydd, if one is going to fantasize why not make it something they can actually fancy?
It seems the "collective consciousness" he imagines is in some state that apparently alarms him. Why he can't just imagine some other state is evidently beyond, well, him.
One thing I can never understand about some people dafydd, if one is going to fantasize why not make it something they can actually fancy?