Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

That's true, Dan. I was thinking about Simpson's Corn God "Code" and the way it was taken apart so quickly. Yes, it has been made very clear that the idea of Dutch having any kind of system is a facade.


Happy New Year to all.

here you are dealing with HDdesign, so take it out quickly and prove it is a facade. If you can't, keep your meaningless comments to yourselves.
Thank you and a happy new year to you too

 

[Paul]

...you didn't buy it back than ... again you don't buy it.

You might almost think it was nonsense.

The difference is that these correlations show up instantly out of nowhere.

No they don't; they show up after you look for them out of manipulating data.

That's the issue.

It really isn't.

You think it only happens in my mind

Because it does.

but with the information already available to you, you could have come to the same conclusions.

Without the same desired result or even the vaguest set of rules we could not possibly come to the same conclusions.

 

[Paul]

take it out quickly and prove it is a facade.

Been there, done that, bought the t shirt.

If you can't, keep your meaningless comments to yourselves.

Getting a little touchy aren't we.

 

[The Man]

Pi gives me these lunar impacts, as many other correlations that are logged in the material. What do you get from some random constants? and stick with these constants consistently

No the people that constructed the probes, launched them and crashed them (those causally related to those impacts) gave, even you, those lunar impacts. Pi gives nothing but the ratio of a circles circumference to its diameter. That you manipulate the value of Pi to get your two "Pi" point constants is given by no one and nothing but you.

 

[The Man]

That's correct

You're not a circle either.

ETA:

Does a circle manipulate Pi ?

A circle can’t manipulate anything, you can and do.

 

[Dutch]

Well the seems to be the difference, the ETCG guy seemed to have a system or methodology that he believed in (at least from what I hear) while Dutch simply seems to have a belief in his intuition not being his.

Where does intuition originate from Dan?
Do you really think that all that happens here in our reality is the result of our ego driven rational from our minds? Don't you ever think about the implications of the possibility that there are expressions of consciousness beyond our immediate understanding? Even you must have had these experiences in your life that made you think....
Now that science 'needs' other dimensions to explain our own ( Stephen Hawking: the 10 years that we would know it all is already 10 years behind us !!), don't you think it would be rather an insult to not te even consider these possibilities? Let alone the opportunities I have been given you and will continue to do so.
Don't you see this HDdesign material continues to show up?

You are all in denial. If HDDesign would be bull, you would have killed it instantly. Back in 2007.

Instead, it continues to show up, with repeated confirmations of identified hideen underlying design

 

[The Man]

Pi is the only constant in this case and the value is fixed, as you might know.

No Pi is not “the only constant in this case”.

Yeah we have been through all this before and thanks for finding the post Daylightstar. As I worked out before this amounts to just multiplying some period of time (X) by two constants.

Pi point 1 or PP₁ = X((1/2)-(1/2Π²))=0.449X
Pi point 2 or PP₂ = X((1/2)+(1/2Π²))=0.551X

Or dividing X by two constants...

PP₁ = X/2.225
PP₂ = X/1.816

I really don't understand why you talk about manipulating Pi. Do I give it a different value?

As already stated neither of the two constant values you use for your “Pi points” are the value of Pi. You get those two constants by manipulating the value of Pi. Continuing to deny it won’t change then fact of what you have claimed you do.

 

[Dutch]

No it hasn't, you have been refusing to properly explain your method for years.

If you genuinely believe that you have explained yourself adequately then you are mistaken and we would all like you to post a clear, repeatable method for obtaining you results.

It has, but The Man is unfortunately the only one who really understood it.
Deep Impact - Earth/Mon/Earth transit - comet Hartley2 fly by.

You look it up yourselves, don't make me do it. I have done it before, takes me alot of time and than there's silence...and you go on with your remarks.
It's there. period.

 

[The Man]

I remember that we have talked about this very same Pi based design in relation to the Deep Impact/Epoxi- Earth-Moon transit and comet Heartly 2 fly by's and you didn't buy it back than. Now it shows up again in relation to these lunar impacts and again you don't buy it.
The difference is that these correlations show up instantly out of nowhere.
And you could have seen it too if you had taken it serious.
That's the issue. You think it only happens in my mind but with the information already available to you, you could have come to the same conclusions. It's important to experience such a thing, otherwise your rigid mind will never open up

Again try some random constants, you only think it doesn't happen in your mind because you simply don't want to look at the information already available to you.

Again we have already been over the fact that with the exact same events and "correlations" one can come to a different conclusion about the message you perceive (we need to be in space and with nuclear power). The interpretation is only in your mind but you just seem to want to ascribe to some HDD entities also only in your mind.

 

[Dutch]

No it hasn't, you have been refusing to properly explain your method for years.

If you genuinely believe that you have explained yourself adequately then you are mistaken and we would all like you to post a clear, repeatable method for obtaining you results.

So Paul, in your humble opinion, could you explain to me why exactly there must be adequate and repeatable methods in order to unveil the subject at hand?
If it would be that easy, you wouldn't have born and this limited 3D reality woudln't probably not even exist. Think about that.
Nevertheless, this specific pi-based underlying design seems to feel the need to show up with these significant events that are happening. just like that, instantly and repeatedly. But you have to take some efforts in order to understand this, which is what you unfortunately refuse to do so

 

[Dutch]

More posturing. That's all you have ever done.

and what have you done in order to try o understand it?

 

[The Man]

Where does intuition originate from Dan?

You. Do you wish to deny your own intuition as well?

Do you really think that all that happens here in our reality is the result of our ego driven rational from our minds?

No but this HDD interpretation of yours is apprently driven by your ego and lack of rational

Don't you ever think about the implications of the possibility that there are expressions of consciousness beyond our immediate understanding?

So far our current "expressions of consciousness" seem to be "beyond our immediate understanding". That may soon change and when we can artificially create what we would consider consciousnesses that understanding might change.

Even you must have had these experiences in your life that made you think....

All experiences in my life make me think.

Now that science 'needs' other dimensions to explain our own

Those "other dimensions" you refer to would be "our own", that's why science would need (if it actually does) them to well "explain our own".

( Stephen Hawking: the 10 years that we would know it all is already 10 years behind us !!), don't you think it would be rather an insult to not te even consider these possibilities? Let alone the opportunities I have been given you and will continue to do so.
Don't you see this HDdesign material continues to show up?

We are considering them, you just need to consider them more and in a more critical manor.

You are all in denial. If HDDesign would be bull, you would have killed it instantly. Back in 2007.

You killed it instantly when you asserted no causal relation from your purported "design". It took awhile to get you there but you put that nail in the coffin.

Instead, it continues to show up, with repeated confirmations of identified hideen underlying design

Patterns can show up and you might intuitively find them (finding patterns is what we are good at) but with no causal relation it is just coincidence. Again try some random variables for your constants and see how many other patterns you can find. When you do get to one that you can at least claim might have a causal relation to the events, then we can talk about it and see if that hypothesis is correct.

 

[Daylightstar]

Why don't you mathematically explain the process of arriving at the claimed need to 'divide a time frame' by Pi twice ....

That has been explained here in this thread, but since you don't actually read it.....

^{Hilite by Daylightstar}
The 'it's over there" trick, where no such 'it' exists.
As documented earlier, I'll show you the posts, Dutch:

You've been nailed on dishonesty soooo many times.

The "it's over there" trick has been employed by you so often, it's gotten stale.

Here:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6802560&postcount=4071
you were nailed on dishonesty, amongst other dishonesties, a variation of the "it's over there" trick.

The above quoted remark by you is thus dishonesty in and of itself.
Very, very nasty.

Ah, a new installment of the "it's over there" trick. ^{1 2}

Knowing your m.o., this means no confirming evidence will be found where you say it is.
As usual.

Not "a" lie, many lies and dishonesties.
Let me show you a couple, besides the one Orphia Nay demonstrated:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7429827&postcount=4496
(lying about mutual understanding)

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7405784&postcount=4405
(lying about not knowing about your demonstrated dishonesty)

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7401411&postcount=4370
(lying about: links which clearly demonstrate your dishonesty, supposedly being out of context)

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7401338&postcount=4362
(lying that you can't be nailed on dishonesty, after this dishonest lie had been elaborately demonstrated)

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7401212&postcount=4338
(an installment of the 'it's over there trick')


You are a liar. plain and simple.

You just keep repeating this same lie, over and over and over again.
You have not provided those calculations, ever.

Your response is just another installment of the 'it's over there" trick, where no such 'it' exists.

The 'it's over there" trick, where no such 'it' exists. Again.
...
You've been provided facts. You ignore the facts provided, even as they are presented to you right after you commit a lie.
Ignore at your own peril.

Yet another installment of the 'it's over there" trick, where no such 'it' exists.
As documented earlier, for instance here:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8095306&postcount=5016

Here's two more examples of the 'it's over there" trick, where no such 'it' exists, by Dutch.
...
It goes on like this all the time.

And evidently, it still does.

 

[Mister Earl]

Seven years plus and counting, Dutch.

 

[Daylightstar]

... this specific Pi based design ...

We've seen no evidence for the existence of a pi-based design.
We've seen your belief and haphazard non-calculations, but no evidence.

 

[Daylightstar]

Pi gives me these lunar impacts, as many other correlations that are logged in the material. ...

Pi doesn't give you anything, It's Wildfire which gives you irrational non-correlations.

 

[Daylightstar]

... The difference is that these correlations show up instantly out of nowhere. ...

Of course they do. Wildfire.

 

[Daylightstar]

here you are dealing with HDdesign, ...

No, we are dealing with you.
It's evidently all about you experiencing .... you.

 

[dafydd]

So Paul, in your humble opinion, could you explain to me why exactly there must be adequate and repeatable methods in order to unveil the subject at hand?

You don't know why? How do you manage to struggle through daily life?

 

[Daylightstar]

... You are all in denial. ...

No, we are confronted with an obnoxious attempt to force down our throats an unsubstantiated belief.