Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

I'll respond to your other post later, it's late

 

[dafydd]

It wouldn't matter if it was early.

 

[Daylightstar]

... the 'logical' path of thought ...

Wildfire.

 

[Daylightstar]

I'll respond to your other post later, it's late

Mister Earl's request is the one you'd need to respond to must urgently. Any other response is in fact entirely redundant.

 

[Mister Earl]

Dan, not just two constants, it's Pi.
It's Pi that is unveiling this Design.
How would you express Pi in our perception of time?
With Deep Impact on comet Temple 1, the Earth -Moon-Epoxi transit and the comet Heartley2 fly Pi first showed its face, at least to my understanding, and continued to show up consistently afterswards.
The point is that this specific pi expression shows up in relation to significant events that happen especially in space.
We see this specific Pi expression in relation to lunar impacts, comet impacts, comet fly-by's and alot in relation with expressions 'as below'.

The thing is, that as soon a such a Lunar Impact is announced, as just has happened this month with the Grail impacts, this very same design shows up instantly when you follow the 'logical' path of thought if you know that is was first unveiled with Deep Impact ( and also lunar impacts )

again

Re- ead that 'communication' post I've written some time ago:
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=18558&mforum=hddesign#18558

I have seen alot of comments that state that every constant could do the job, but I haven't seen anyone apply such random constants repeatedly while unveiling essential or significant coherence between the events that show up.
But that would be based on random constants, I talk about Pi.

I'm not manipulating Pi. Again I ask you: How would you express Pi in our perception of time? If you find another way and show me significant correlations between events that happen in our reality, based on events that have already happened but also showing up instantly with future related events, you might be right. But I'm pretty much sure you can't come up with such another Pi- expression, not even with another random chosen set of constants that you claim would be equaly valid.

"And look! On this one thousand, two hundred and sixty-first paper! Right there. Totally a Higgs."

 

[The Man]

Dan, not just two constants, it's Pi.

Nope, neither of your two constants has the value of Pi. Even if one of them did, so what?

It's Pi that is unveiling this Design.

Nope, that you use Pi to arrive at your constants is simply your choice. Don’t try to blame Pi for your choices or actions.

How would you express Pi in our perception of time?

I wouldn’t, Pi is a dimensionless value so once you try to tack a dimension (like time) onto it then it isn’t Pi any more.

With Deep Impact on comet Temple 1, the Earth -Moon-Epoxi transit and the comet Heartley2 fly Pi first showed its face, at least to my understanding, and continued to show up consistently afterswards.
The point is that this specific pi expression shows up in relation to significant events that happen especially in space.
We see this specific Pi expression in relation to lunar impacts, comet impacts, comet fly-by's and alot in relation with expressions 'as below'.

Again you picked your constants and you picked the events, that they seem to “express” some “relation” also of your own choosing, neither surprises nor impresses anyone but you.

The thing is, that as soon a such a Lunar Impact is announced, as just has happened this month with the Grail impacts, this very same design shows up instantly when you follow the 'logical' path of thought if you know that is was first unveiled with Deep Impact ( and also lunar impacts )

again

Re- ead that 'communication' post I've written some time ago:
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=18558&mforum=hddesign#18558

I have seen alot of comments that state that every constant could do the job, but I haven't seen anyone apply such random constants repeatedly while unveiling essential or significant coherence between the events that show up.
But that would be based on random constants, I talk about Pi.

I'm not manipulating Pi. Again I ask you: How would you express Pi in our perception of time? If you find another way and show me significant correlations between events that happen in our reality, based on events that have already happened but also showing up instantly with future related events, you might be right. But I'm pretty much sure you can't come up with such another Pi- expression, not even with another random chosen set of constants that you claim would be equaly valid.

You are manipulating Pi, that’s how you got your two constants. Again I’ll explain to you that Pi is a dimensionless value (specifically the ratio a circles circumference to its diameter in Euclidean space) so whatever you might choose to “express “ “in our perception of time”, having that temporal dimension and not being the referenced ratio, specifically isn’t Pi. People have already told you the way these particular events are ‘correlated’ and happen, they are planed and executed by the same organization, NASA. That relation should show up instantly even to you.

Try “another random chosen set of constants” Dutch and just see how many events you can, well, correlate.

 

[Wolrab]

snip...
I haven't seen anyone apply such random constants repeatedly while unveiling essential or significant coherence between the events that show up.

I did. You are lying.

 

[Daylightstar]

...
We see this specific Pi expression in relation to lunar impacts, comet impacts, comet fly-by's and alot in relation with expressions 'as below'....

No Dutch, we don't see any such thing. Only you think you see them.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4072783&postcount=968
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8380943&postcount=5443

 

[Orphia Nay]

Right, you're letting your neurons run wild, wildfire I'll call it.

Listen to that, Dutch.

Every random thought you have does not need to be carved in stone.

Learn to sort the wheat from the chaff.

Hint: HDD is chaff. I'm not sure if you produce any wheat. Prove me wrong.

 

[Dutch]

Great so your purported “design” is not the cause of anything including your “correlations”. It is a mirror Dutch that you hold up to yourself to express your own views that for some reason you’d apparently just rather not own yourself.

The Man, if such a specific Design would show up repeatedly and instantly before your very own eyes, time after time again, in a way that you understand that it can't be just a coincidence, wouldn't you think that there could be a purpose behind the fact that it apparently can be known and don't you think it would be rather selfish to keep that to yourselves?
With specific knowledges comes specific responsibilities

 

[Dutch]

I have thought twice. I've thought more than that, given the six-or-seven-year time frame this discussion has been going on. You've been told many times that the first step required to test your HDD scientifically is for you to explain the process, from start to finish, and include all math and graphs required.

To date you refuse to do this. Therefore, there has been a progression of exactly zero. I continually predict that not only will you not post your process, but you'll continually refuse to do so. I'm always correct.

As a matter of fact all steps that unveiled the hiddn Pi based design in relation the these Moon Impact are logged. That's the process. Only The Man did take the time to understand it. It's all there, go read for once

 

[Dutch]

Mister Earl's request is the one you'd need to respond to must urgently. Any other response is in fact entirely redundant.

So is this post, you had to read about the Pi based design in relation to these lunar impacts. You didn't, as usual.

 

[Dutch]

You are manipulating Pi, that’s how you got your two constants. Again I’ll explain to you that Pi is a dimensionless value (specifically the ratio a circles circumference to its diameter in Euclidean space) so whatever you might choose to “express “ “in our perception of time”, having that temporal dimension and not being the referenced ratio, specifically isn’t Pi. People have already told you the way these particular events are ‘correlated’ and happen, they are planed and executed by the same organization, NASA. That relation should show up instantly even to you.

Try “another random chosen set of constants” Dutch and just see how many events you can, well, correlate.

Does a circle manipulate Pi ? No, it's just there.
Do you deny the specific Pi correlations with these lunar Impacts ?
You can't, they are just there.

NASA planned and executed some of these impacts, as they did with the Heartley 2 fly by when this very same specific Pi based design was first discovered. Chandryaan was from India, also ESA was involved. But yet, these intelligent correlations are there or Pi isn't 3,1415etc in your book.

So what does that tell you when you really think about it?

 

[Daylightstar]

The Man, if such a specific Design would show up repeatedly and instantly before your very own eyes, time after time again, in a way that you understand that it can't be just a coincidence, wouldn't you think that there could be a purpose behind the fact that it apparently can be known and don't you think it would be rather selfish to keep that to yourselves?
With specific knowledges comes specific responsibilities

You have failed to provide any valid indication whatsoever that you have 'specific knowledge' regarding any 'specific design'.
It is obvious that you believe that you do, but then again, you appear to be easily impressed and overwhelmed by the results of your brain not functioning correctly.

You 'do stuff', something goes haywire between your ears and you think the result is reality. That's your process. Wildfire.

Mister Earl's request is the one you'd need to respond to must urgently. Any other response is in fact entirely redundant.

So is this post, you had to read about the Pi based design in relation to these lunar impacts. You didn't, as usual.

And Mister Earl is proven to be correct, again.

...
To date you refuse to do this. Therefore, there has been a progression of exactly zero. I continually predict that not only will you not post your process, but you'll continually refuse to do so. I'm always correct.

Does a circle manipulate Pi ? No, it's just there. ....

...
In order to 'express' Pi between 2 events you have to devide the timeframe in between twice with Pi. Than you have to deduct that result from the timeframe and devide the remaining by 2. Add the result to one of this halfs and you get 2 points in between that express Pi together. ...

^{Hilite by Daylightstar}Why don't you mathematically explain the process of arriving at the claimed need to 'divide a time frame' by Pi twice ....

...
Do you deny the specific Pi correlations with these lunar Impacts ?
You can't, they are just there. ...

Up to now, it appears just something you believe. Projecting unsubstantiated absolute confidence isn't going to change that.

...
So what does that tell you when you really think about it?

That you have failed to substantiate your claim.

 

[Daylightstar]

... Projecting unsubstantiated absolute confidence isn't going to change that.
...

This is the theme of your posting habits here, projecting unsubstantiated absolute confidence, it also appears to be the only thing you can do.

 

[Daylightstar]

... when this very same specific Pi based design was first discovered. ...

No Dutch, when you have a wildfire episode and you become

... impressed and overwhelmed ...

..... that doesn't mean that you discovered something.
By all accounts, it's just you, experiencing .... you.

 

[Paul]

I take it from your total silence on the issue, Dutch, that you are unable to place the large list of obvious dates onto the really important timeline.

Colour me entirely unsurprised.

 

[Wolrab]

What is so difficult about posting something like this: The interval between x event and y event is z. Pi is a factor of z because z/pi is this real number.?

 

[The Man]

The Man, if such a specific Design would show up repeatedly and instantly before your very own eyes, time after time again, in a way that you understand that it can't be just a coincidence, wouldn't you think that there could be a purpose behind the fact that it apparently can be known and don't you think it would be rather selfish to keep that to yourselves?

If your purported “design” isn't the cause of these events, as you assert, then it is, by that assertion, simply a coincidence. Again try just some constants at random and see what you get.

With specific knowledges comes specific responsibilities

You are neither Peter Parker nor Spiderman

 

[The Man]

Does a circle manipulate Pi ? No, it's just there.
Do you deny the specific Pi correlations with these lunar Impacts ?
You can't, they are just there.

So are you just going to try to deny that you got your two constants by manipulating the value of Pi?

NASA planned and executed some of these impacts, as they did with the Heartley 2 fly by when this very same specific Pi based design was first discovered. Chandryaan was from India, also ESA was involved. But yet, these intelligent correlations are there or Pi isn't 3,1415etc in your book.

So what does that tell you when you really think about it?

It tells me that you're still just going to try to deny that you got your two constants by manipulating the value of Pi.

Why do you feel the need to deny what you have claimed you do? You have used other constants in some of your "timelines". So you do know you can get your "correlations" without even trying to evoke Pi in some numerological incantation of your own choosing. Just pick some constant at random Dutch and pretend it has some significance for you, then see how many of your "correlations" you can find.