Dutch,
I certainly recognize, as stated before, that you have picked two constants you got by manipulating the value Pi. You could have picked others and at times you do. In fact there are an infinite set of constant pairs (that sum to 1) you can pick by manipulating any number of starting values like Pi. Even randomly distributed events are going to fall along one constant pair or another from time to time. Because we can always map those random values to the same infinite set of constant pairs. So no “Pi based design” just two constants you picked that some events might seem to jibe with.
Dan, not just two constants, it's Pi.
It's Pi that is unveiling this Design.
How would you express Pi in our perception of time?
With Deep Impact on comet Temple 1, the Earth -Moon-Epoxi transit and the comet Heartley2 fly Pi first showed its face, at least to my understanding, and continued to show up consistently afterswards.
The point is that this specific pi expression shows up in relation to significant events that happen especially in space.
We see this specific Pi expression in relation to lunar impacts, comet impacts, comet fly-by's and alot in relation with expressions 'as below'.
The thing is, that as soon a such a Lunar Impact is announced, as just has happened this month with the Grail impacts, this very same design shows up instantly when you follow the 'logical' path of thought if you know that is was first unveiled with Deep Impact ( and also lunar impacts )
again
Re- ead that 'communication' post I've written some time ago:
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=18558&mforum=hddesign#18558
I have seen alot of comments that state that every constant could do the job, but I haven't seen anyone apply such random constants repeatedly while unveiling essential or significant coherence between the events that show up.
But that would be based on random constants, I talk about Pi.
I'm not manipulating Pi. Again I ask you: How would you express Pi in our perception of time? If you find another way and show me significant correlations between events that happen in our reality, based on events that have already happened but also showing up instantly with future related events, you might be right. But I'm pretty much sure you can't come up with such another Pi- expression, not even with another random chosen set of constants that you claim would be equaly valid.