Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dutch said:
...Normally I use a +/- 1 day timeframe but a few days around the 'peak date' are also valid. It also depends on other timecoded patterns that could initiate an early or late expression of the underlying themes on a specific timecoded pattern.
Click to expand...
In other words, you can fiddle with the dates until something matches, despite claims of accuracy and perfect fits.


not sure why yet
Click to expand...
Because your determined dates are wrong.
 
Dutch said:
? elaborate please, thought you were arguing about the 'peak' issue here again, that's why I used the srebrenica example again
Click to expand...

“’peak’ issue”? What the heck are you talking about? The association of “impacts” was yours as was considering the Apollo 14 landing as an “impact” on the moon for your “correlation”. An impact is a singular event very limited in time. Are you contending that the Apollo 14 landing was an “impact” that somehow extended to three days before the LEM even undocked from the CSM? The CSM spent less total time in lunar orbit then the error in you “correlation”. You defined the “’peak’ issue” in your purported Apollo 14 “correlation” as “impacts” if you want to broaden that further to say the start of an “impact” trajectory it leaves you in an even more untenable situation. The LEM did not start on a lunar descent trajectory until sometime after it undocked, still three days after your Phi point. While the Tunguska object may well have been on an impact trajectory, months, years or centuries before the event, making any orbital position of the earth potentially valid for your “correlation”. Sorry, trying to pawn your error off to your “’peak’ issue” will only make things worse for you.
 
Tunguska - Moon Impact - Moon Impact
connected by Phi point Golden Mean
Click to expand...
Besides the given correlations, I expected some 'Tunguska conditioning' around this moon impact too, around October 9
and here it is:
BBC mainstream:
Asteroid collision 'less likely'
8 October 2009
Refined calculations of the asteroid Apophis's path show it is far less likely smash into Earth in 2036 than was previously thought.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8296796.stm
linked to this article at the same page:
Dr Richard Crowther is head of the United Nations Near Earth Object (Neo) programme. He told the BBC News website: "Tunguska reminds us that these impact events have occurred in the relatively recent past.
"The surveys suggest that objects of this size are numerous enough to anticipate similar events in the relatively near future."
Many observers are concerned by what they regard as a lack of action to counter the threat posed by near-Earth asteroids.
California-based space advocacy group the Planetary Society recently awarded an Atlanta-based aerospace company $50,000 (£25,000) to design a spacecraft which could rendezvous with and track the path of the asteroid 99942 Apophis.
In 2029, this 270m-wide chunk of cosmic debris will closely approach the Earth - so close, in fact, it will be visible with the naked eye.
from:
Fire in the sky: Tunguska at 100
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7470283.stm
 
Paul said:
OK, allowing for the fact that you just might be unable to understand the original point, I'll reiterate:

Despite many, many, many explanations to the contrary, you still insist that there is some vague message about the dangers of nuclear power. The nuclear weapons you refer to were designed to explode and so worked as required and, whatever the morals of their use, are not an example of unintended danger. As also mentioned before, nuclear power is used daily, all over the world and in space, without incident, and has been for years.
Click to expand...

and what does this tell you about the misuse of nuclear power?

You are totally ignoring the main issues here: what does a nuclear detonation actually mean for other dimensional realms? and what are the influences at soul level?

I know your answer, they both don't exists so why worry

sleep on
 
In other words, you can fiddle with the dates until something matches, despite claims of accuracy and perfect fits.
Click to expand...

nope

try it yourselve, you may have a lucky hit but soon you will be lost in your fantasy. In HDDesign these coincidences continue to show up, they happen all the time
 
The Man said:
“’peak’ issue”? What the heck are you talking about? The association of “impacts” was yours as was considering the Apollo 14 landing as an “impact” on the moon for your “correlation”. An impact is a singular event very limited in time. Are you contending that the Apollo 14 landing was an “impact” that somehow extended to three days before the LEM even undocked from the CSM? The CSM spent less total time in lunar orbit then the error in you “correlation”. You defined the “’peak’ issue” in your purported Apollo 14 “correlation” as “impacts” if you want to broaden that further to say the start of an “impact” trajectory it leaves you in an even more untenable situation. The LEM did not start on a lunar descent trajectory until sometime after it undocked, still three days after your Phi point. While the Tunguska object may well have been on an impact trajectory, months, years or centuries before the event, making any orbital position of the earth potentially valid for your “correlation”. Sorry, trying to pawn your error off to your “’peak’ issue” will only make things worse for you.
Click to expand...

what are you talking about? the determined 'peak' phi point is nicely centered between the start of this mission and the actual landing and impact. simple.
 
Paul said:
Yet after many posts pointing out hat there appears to be no evidence for the truth of the assertion, you still insist on using it. Why is that?
Click to expand...

July 18
President Truman writes in his diary, "P.M. [Churchill] & I ate alone. Discussed Manhattan (it is a success). Decided to tell Stalin about it. Stalin had told P.M. of telegram from Jap Emperor asking for peace. Stalin also read his answer to me. It was satisfactory. Believe the Japs will fold up before Russia comes in. I am sure they will when Manhattan [reference to Manhattan Project] appears over their homeland. I shall inform about it at an opportune time."
July 21
President Truman approves order for atomic bombs to be used.
July 23
UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill remarks, "t is quite clear that the United States do not at the present time desire Russian participation in the war against Japan."
http://www.nuclearfiles.org/menu/timeline/1940/1945.htm
 
Dutch said:
what are you talking about? the determined 'peak' phi point is nicely centered between the start of this mission and the actual landing and impact. simple.
Click to expand...

“nicely centered between the start of this mission and the actual landing”? What the heck are you talking about it is 2 days after launch and 3 days before landing, anything but centered.

Homework for Dutch:
Look up the words “centered” and “perfectly”.


That “Pakistan suggests a six-point agenda with Kashmir after the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965”, on February 2 1966 and “The Groundhog Day gale hits the north-eastern United States and south-eastern Canada”, on February 2 1976 are more “nicely centered” around your “determined 'peak' phi point” then “the start of this mission and the actual landing”



Of course on February 2 1971 “Idi Amin replaces President Milton Obote as leader of Uganda.” So I’m sure you can make up some message from that as well, or just stick with the one you had already picked and so desperately want to confirm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_2
 
“nicely centered between the start of this mission and the actual landing”? What the heck are you talking about it is 2 days after launch and 3 days before landing, anything but centered.

Homework for Dutch:
Look up the words “centered” and “perfectly”.
Click to expand...

moon impact was on feb 4, don't do this 'The Man'

come up with significant arguments
 
That “Pakistan suggests a six-point agenda with Kashmir after the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965”, on February 2 1966 and “The Groundhog Day gale hits the north-eastern United States and south-eastern Canada”, on February 2 1976 are more “nicely centered” around your “determined 'peak' phi point” then “the start of this mission and the actual landing”
Click to expand...

NO NO NO

this is just insane....

the Phi point is determined for around 'peak' date february 2 1971

Do you actually read what has been posted or are you just too stupid? I'm fed up with this ridicule. do your homework .
 
Dutch said:
we have discussed before how you should look at a timeframe, I gave the example of the venus transit, go read again. the determined 'peak' date is February 2, 1971, with the launch a few days earlier and an actual impact on the moon 2 days later, followed by the moonlanding the next day. nicely centered around the determined 'peak date'.
Click to expand...
As you recommended, I searched this tread for the text "Venus Transit"
  • In post #182, you link the Venus Transit to Hariri killing based on the date of the Tribunal Court coming into force
  • In post #244, you link the Venus Transit to two school shootings (Columbine and Virgina tech), based on the fact that there are 2919 days between the shootings and 2918 days between the 2004 and 2012 transits
  • In post #267, you link the Venus Transit to the an airliner crash in Greece and one in Brazil
  • In post #335, you link the Venus Transit to the 2007 quake and tsunami in Sumarta and an earthquake in 2007
  • In post #395, you link the Venus Transit to the "exit of the 'Sun King'" (Ronald Raegan)
  • In post #424, you link the Venus Transit to the birth of Mehmet Ali Ağca, who shot and wounded Pope John Paul II in 1981
  • In post #424, you link the Venus Transit to the attack on the USS Cole
  • In post #605, you link the Venus Transit to the landfall of Hurricane Katrina at New Orleans (and got the date wrong)
  • In post #687, you link the Venus Transit to the death of some obscure person named "Chino"
  • In post #738, you link the Venus Transit to Tony Blair, the Kennedys, and Hillary Clinton
  • In post #869, you link the Venus Transit to Ariel Sharon's stroke and subsequent coma

... and that's within only the first 1000 posts of this thread.

It's not a timeline; it's a bloody dog's breakfast!

Not to mention the fact you use two different dates for the end of the Mayan calendar: in posts 182, 244, and 623 it's December 21 2012. In posts 376, 468, 479, 524, and 687 it's June 6, 2012. That certainly falls outside your standard ±1 day fudge factor.
 
Dutch said:
July 18
President Truman writes in his diary, "P.M. [Churchill] & I ate alone. Discussed Manhattan (it is a success). Decided to tell Stalin about it. Stalin had told P.M. of telegram from Jap Emperor asking for peace. Stalin also read his answer to me. It was satisfactory. Believe the Japs will fold up before Russia comes in. I am sure they will when Manhattan [reference to Manhattan Project] appears over their homeland. I shall inform about it at an opportune time."
July 21
President Truman approves order for atomic bombs to be used.
July 23
UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill remarks, "t is quite clear that the United States do not at the present time desire Russian participation in the war against Japan."
http://www.nuclearfiles.org/menu/timeline/1940/1945.htm
Click to expand...


Good. That agrees with what we know of Truman's knowledge of the bomb.

However, you have also stated that he made a "political decision" on July 20 to use the bomb. Do you have a source for that? (Actually, that was the date I was wanting to ask you about in my post #2361.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom