Hyper Dimensional Design

[The Man]

moon impact was on feb 4,

What has that got to do with the Apollo 14 “actual landing” that you originally referenced, continued to reference and that I replied to? February 4 still isn’t February 2. The Tunguska- Idi Amin - LCROSS impact correlation fits perfectly and since your “communication” is made up by you anyway, it works even better then your purported correlation.

don't do this 'The Man'

Don’t do what show how you just look for things to fit the “correlations” you want?

come up with significant arguments

You first.

 

[The Man]

NO NO NO

this is just insane....

Ah so your dimensional hype is becoming clearer to you now.

the Phi point is determined for around 'peak' date february 2 1971

February 2 1966 and February 2 1976 are perfectly centered around your 'peak' date February 2 1971.

Do you actually read what has been posted or are you just too stupid? I'm fed up with this ridicule. do your homework .

Do you actually expect that when you do check the news and find some other event to stuff into your “correlation” that others will just forget the original event you cited particularly if you continue to reference it?

Not quite fed up enough I imagine to give up your post hoc news searching “correlations”.

Done that homework yet on “centered” and “perfectly”?

 

[Paul]

Besides the given correlations, I expected some 'Tunguska conditioning' around this moon impact too, around October 9
and here it is:

Apart from the fact that 'Tunguska conditioning' doesn't mean anything, the article actually advocates entering space to monitor near earth objects. So hardly stay out of space is it?

 

[Paul]

and what does this tell you about the misuse of nuclear power?

It doesn't say anything about the misuse of nuclear power, which was not your point anyway. If you don't like nuclear energy of any sort, say so, don't pretend you have a message from the stars that doesn't hold up to any scrutiny.

You are totally ignoring the main issues here: what does a nuclear detonation actually mean for other dimensional realms?

Really, you are worried about the effects of explosions from 1945 on higher dimension which you cannot enumerate, cannot define any connection to, and cannot even show to exist? That's the main issue?

and what are the influences at soul level?

Everyone knows the soul survives a nuclear explosion, ask Xenu.

I know your answer, they both don't exists so why worry

See, you don't know as much as you think.

 

[Paul]

...appears over their homeland. I shall inform about it at an opportune time."
July 21
President Truman approves order for atomic bombs to be used.
July 23
UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill remarks...

Yes that is the page that the Wiki article uses, but even the original page has no corroboration for the assertion; Truman doesn't mention it anywhere in his diaries or papers, it doesn't appear to be in any official documents, and none of the other sites about Truman and the bomb seem to have any information.

That is why you should check before you make unsupported assertions, and why you should be prepared to acknowledge that there is a problem with the way you asses the validity of your data.

 

[Paul]

Do you actually read what has been posted or are you just too stupid? I'm fed up with this ridicule. do your homework .

Now, now Dutch, suicide by mod doesn't work when we don't report you.

 

[dlorde]

now, now dutch, suicide by mod doesn't work when we don't report you.

rofl!

 

[Dutch]

As you recommended, I searched this tread for the text "Venus Transit"

• In post #182, you link the Venus Transit to Hariri killing based on the date of the Tribunal Court coming into force
• In post #244, you link the Venus Transit to two school shootings (Columbine and Virgina tech), based on the fact that there are 2919 days between the shootings and 2918 days between the 2004 and 2012 transits
• In post #267, you link the Venus Transit to the an airliner crash in Greece and one in Brazil
• In post #335, you link the Venus Transit to the 2007 quake and tsunami in Sumarta and an earthquake in 2007
• In post #395, you link the Venus Transit to the "exit of the 'Sun King'" (Ronald Raegan)
• In post #424, you link the Venus Transit to the birth of Mehmet Ali Ağca, who shot and wounded Pope John Paul II in 1981
• In post #424, you link the Venus Transit to the attack on the USS Cole
• In post #605, you link the Venus Transit to the landfall of Hurricane Katrina at New Orleans (and got the date wrong)
• In post #687, you link the Venus Transit to the death of some obscure person named "Chino"
• In post #738, you link the Venus Transit to Tony Blair, the Kennedys, and Hillary Clinton
• In post #869, you link the Venus Transit to Ariel Sharon's stroke and subsequent coma

... and that's within only the first 1000 posts of this thread.

It's not a timeline; it's a bloody dog's breakfast!

Not to mention the fact you use two different dates for the end of the Mayan calendar: in posts 182, 244, and 623 it's December 21 2012. In posts 376, 468, 479, 524, and 687 it's June 6, 2012. That certainly falls outside your standard ±1 day fudge factor.

you are quoting out of context without the explanations given

makes no sense at all, there are even much more correlations with the venus transits. There's a dispute about the end of the Matyan calender, december 21 or 23. Doesn't make a huge difference in HDDesign because of the timeframes I use.

 

[Dutch]

Good. That agrees with what we know of Truman's knowledge of the bomb.

However, you have also stated that he made a "political decision" on July 20 to use the bomb. Do you have a source for that? (Actually, that was the date I was wanting to ask you about in my post #2361.)

July 20, 1945 is the calculated 'peak' phi point, Trumans approval falls within the timeframe

 

[Dutch]

What has that got to do with the Apollo 14 “actual landing” that you originally referenced, continued to reference and that I replied to? February 4 still isn’t February 2. The Tunguska- Idi Amin - LCROSS impact correlation fits perfectly and since your “communication” is made up by you anyway, it works even better then your purported correlation.

'The Man'.....the moon Impact on October 9, 2009 made me intuitively think of Tunguska, I calculated the phi point and and around that date apollo 14 mission showed up, with an actual moon impact

simple

 

[Dutch]

Don’t do what show how you just look for things to fit the “correlations” you want?

Its true that when I calculate the Phi point between Tunguska and moon Impact on October 9, that I look for correlations that are confirming the underlying themes

I think you can understand the difference

 

[Dutch]

Ah so your dimensional hype is becoming clearer to you now.

cheap, out of context again

 

[Dutch]

February 2 1966 and February 2 1976 are perfectly centered around your 'peak' date February 2 1971.

?

they are 5 years off the phipoint, so they are no phipoints between the 2 events ( Tunguska - moon impact )

 

[AWPrime]

Dutch you are incapable of being critical of your own work. So when others use your system and your brain finally starts being critical, you find flaws.

The other part of the problem is that with your 'system' you can get away with claiming anything.

 

[dafydd]

Dutch you are incapable of being critical of your own work. So when others use your system and your brain finally starts being critical, you find flaws.

The other part of the problem is that with your 'system' you can get away with claiming anything.

Yep,one size fits all.

 

[Blue Mountain]

you are quoting out of context without the explanations given

Even in context your explanations do not make sense.

makes no sense at all, there are even much more correlations with the venus transits.

That's what we've been saying all along

As for "even much more correlations," the system you've invented can pretty much link any two events provided one is willing to put in the work to play around with Phi, Pi, orbital periods, and the computation of days. Usually you don't do that. Your preferred method is to compute dates first, then look for events that more or less fit. Hence the numerous "correlations" with the Venus Transit.

There's a dispute about the end of the Matyan calender, december 21 or 23. Doesn't make a huge difference in HDDesign because of the timeframes I use.

First, the Wikipedia article titled "Mesoamerican Long Count calendar" makes no reference to a dispute. The date for the end of b'ak'tun 13 is given as December 20, 2012, with December 21 being the first day of the 14th. You may have other sources; if so, please post one here.

Second, in several posts on this thread you use a date of June 6, 2012 for the "end of the Mayan Calendar." Where did that date come from?

Finally, the Mayan calendar is not "ending" in December 12. Only the current Long Count is ending, and a new one is starting. Not unlike the millennium most of the Western word celebrated a few years ago. Our calendar did not end in 1999.

 

[Blue Mountain]

July 20, 1945 is the calculated 'peak' phi point, Trumans approval falls within the timeframe

I was not asking you how you arrived at that date. I asking you for the source for your "fact" that "Truman made a political decision on June 20, 1945 to use the atomic bomb against the Japanese."

We're asking because, as far as we know, he was not aware of the results of the tests until the next day. Or did he decide on June 20 to drop the bomb on Japan even it was a dud?

 

[Paul]

July 20, 1945 is the calculated 'peak' phi point, Trumans approval falls within the timeframe

By calculated 'peak' phi point you mean date I made up to give me more leeway.

 

[The Man]

'The Man'.....the moon Impact on October 9, 2009 made me intuitively think of Tunguska, I calculated the phi point and and around that date apollo 14 mission showed up, with an actual moon impact

simple

An impact not on your "calculated” “phi point", but Idi Amin is and his impact on the peoples of Uganda was far more significant then any of the impacts in your correlation. Why do you so blatantly ignore this Uganda Karma communication?

 

[Broes]

when I calculate the Phi point..<snap> ..I look for correlations that are confirming the underlying themes

So you are trying to fabricate the data to match your hypothese... How scientific...