Hyper Dimensional Design

[Blue Mountain]

An impact not on your "calculated” “phi point", but Idi Amin is and his impact on the peoples of Uganda was far more significant then any of the impacts in your correlation. Why do you so blatantly ignore this Uganda Karma communication?

Well, HDD is strangely Eurocentric that way. If it's minor and happens in Europe, then it's a communication. HDD figures only in Africa and Asia if the events are big. Like big enough to make the international news headlines. Canada and Antarctica are strangely non-existent in the HDD universe ... I wonder why that is?

 

[LissaLysikan]

His dart board isn't big enough to hold a map of the whole world, so he just pasted up the parts he thinks are important.

 

[The Man]

Its true that when I calculate the Phi point between Tunguska and moon Impact on October 9, that I look for correlations that are confirming the underlying themes

I think you can understand the difference

The "underlying themes" you just make up in your head. What "difference" are you referring to?

 

[The Man]

cheap, out of context again

Ah so your dimensional hype is becoming even more clear to you now, excellent.

 

[The Man]

?

they are 5 years off the phipoint, so they are no phipoints between the 2 events ( Tunguska - moon impact )

None of your purportedly correlated events are on your phipoint either. Those two events I noted are as nicely centered around your phipoint as two of the events in your “correlation”. Your “( Tunguska - moon impact )” phipoint is perfectly centered “between the 2 events”. So far I am the only one to give a significant event directly on your phipoint indicating that as the peak phipoint event as opposed to your “off the phipoint” Apollo 14 event.

 

[The Man]

His dart board isn't big enough to hold a map of the whole world, so he just pasted up the parts he thinks are important.

Ah new insight into the workings of Dutch’s dimensional calculations involving a pseudo stochastic process.

 

[Dutch]

Dutch you are incapable of being critical of your own work. So when others use your system and your brain finally starts being critical, you find flaws.

The other part of the problem is that with your 'system' you can get away with claiming anything.

I don't know about others intuition, are you saying I just must dismiss these 'coincidences' when they continuously occur while working with this stuff?

not a wise idea

 

[Dutch]

As for "even much more correlations," the system you've invented can pretty much link any two events provided one is willing to put in the work to play around with Phi, Pi, orbital periods, and the computation of days. Usually you don't do that. Your preferred method is to compute dates first, then look for events that more or less fit. Hence the numerous "correlations" with the Venus Transit.

Nope, just like the end of the mayan calendar, these 2 Venus Transits of our times regularly show up because they are important timemarkers. There are indeed numerous timecoded patterns running through these dates. I expect even more correlations wuth the June 2012 Venus transit because of the increased understanding and identifying of timecoded patterns

 

[AWPrime]

I don't know about others intuition, are you saying I just must dismiss these 'coincidences' when they continuously occur while working with this stuff?

not a wise idea

Why don't you start with a few small things:
- Proper descriptive terms
- A rigid system
- Add a way to filter out BS


As it stands now nobody can take you serious.

 

[Dutch]

First, the Wikipedia article titled "Mesoamerican Long Count calendar" makes no reference to a dispute. The date for the end of b'ak'tun 13 is given as December 20, 2012, with December 21 being the first day of the 14th. You may have other sources; if so, please post one here.

December 23 – An alternative date for the completion of the thirteenth B'ak'tun in the Long Count calendar, calculated using another version of the GMT correlation[9] which is supported by a few Mayanist researchers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012

 

[Dutch]

Second, in several posts on this thread you use a date of June 6, 2012 for the "end of the Mayan Calendar." Where did that date come from?

I don't think you read well.

June 6, 2012 is the last Venus Transit prior to the end of the Mayan Calendar. I've never used June 6, 2012 as the end of the Mayan Calendar ( or it would be a typo, maybe you can show me )

 

[Dutch]

Finally, the Mayan calendar is not "ending" in December 12. Only the current Long Count is ending, and a new one is starting. Not unlike the millennium most of the Western word celebrated a few years ago. Our calendar did not end in 1999.

Yes I agree that the long count is ending and a new one is starting. That;s what I'm referring to when I use 'end of the mayan calendar'

 

[Dutch]

I was not asking you how you arrived at that date. I asking you for the source for your "fact" that "Truman made a political decision on June 20, 1945 to use the atomic bomb against the Japanese."

We're asking because, as far as we know, he was not aware of the results of the tests until the next day. Or did he decide on June 20 to drop the bomb on Japan even it was a dud?

I wouldn't care less as its still at Phi point timeframe

 

[Dutch]

By calculated 'peak' phi point you mean date I made up to give me more leeway.

nope, the determination of a timeframe has been expleined several times

 

[Dutch]

An impact not on your "calculated” “phi point", but Idi Amin is and his impact on the peoples of Uganda was far more significant then any of the impacts in your correlation. Why do you so blatantly ignore this Uganda Karma communication?

So you think Tunguska happened because of Idi Amin? and what has Idi to do with our activities in space?

 

[Dutch]

So you are trying to fabricate the data to match your hypothese... How scientific...

There's nothing scientific to *think* about this moon Impact and than to expect a related event at phi point with the Tunguska event.

That there's indeed an event that seems to correlate is something else and should make you think ( although I doubt you will)

 

[Dutch]

Well, HDD is strangely Eurocentric that way. If it's minor and happens in Europe, then it's a communication. HDD figures only in Africa and Asia if the events are big. Like big enough to make the international news headlines. Canada and Antarctica are strangely non-existent in the HDD universe ... I wonder why that is?

non-existent? are you sure you have read the Earth-change section of the HDDesign material? Also, I don't think there are enough people living in Antarctica to do dominate the 'expressions' at macro level, do you?

 

[Dutch]

The "underlying themes" you just make up in your head. What "difference" are you referring to?

the difference between expecting a related event at Phi point between 2 specific events, with indeed such an event at phipoint

and

if you not understand the difference, in this specific case:

expecting a 'moon impact' related event at EACH phi point between this october 9, 2009 moon impact and every random date

 

[Dutch]

None of your purportedly correlated events are on your phipoint either. Those two events I noted are as nicely centered around your phipoint as two of the events in your “correlation”. Your “( Tunguska - moon impact )” phipoint is perfectly centered “between the 2 events”. So far I am the only one to give a significant event directly on your phipoint indicating that as the peak phipoint event as opposed to your “off the phipoint” Apollo 14 event.

centered within the timeframe of this phi point of course, that is a few days from launch and impact. Your example is years apart and irrelevant

 

[Dutch]

Ah new insight into the workings of Dutch’s dimensional calculations involving a pseudo stochastic process.

Well its true that we are changing the outcome on the timecoded patterns, depending how we deal with the karmic issues at hand