Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

Paul, do you understand what happens if you reply on stand alone posts now?

 

[Dutch]

Show us anything that indicates this, and I don't mean rocks falling out of the sky before we even went into space.

What does one need? apparently its not enough for you. Not a surprise though, you will dismiss everything. your problem

 

[Dutch]

What do you mean by must not (we've been doing it for years alreday), and what do you mean by mess with?

Do I really have to explain to you why Hirhoshima - Nagasaki wasn't a good thing to do? focus Paul

 

[Dutch]

Somebody help me.


Is this a prediction, a prediction, in fact, that...we will crash on the moon twice today, October 9th, (2009) ??

Or is this somehow another postdiction?

great

 

[Dutch]

You mean that “Pi correlations” that you based on a trajectory that the spacecraft is no longer taking?




How so? Have you ever tried doing your “correlations” from a less disastrous perspective. There are countless successful space endeavors, the Apollo landings just being a portion of them. The spacecraft “impacts” you referred to were intended and thus successful space endeavors. The decision to use atomic weapons was intended to end the war with Japan and was successful in that endeavor. Nuclear power is successfully used around the world and out in space, all indicative of a very high success rate in both of those endeavors. Perhaps with your confirmation bias focused only on your own “warning” “communication” you have missed applying your own correlations to the substantially more prevalent successes of those endeavors. Take off your blinders Dutch and open your own eyes, if there is any clear message from our endeavors in space and nuclear power it is that we are far more successful then not at employing both of them effectively.

That's exactly what we can expect from a rigid mind set. There's not much hope for mankind if we would all understand reality like that.

The correlations I have given pop up out of nowhere, its a personal choice how you deal with it. You just don't want to see it.

 

[Paul]

When we talk about the srebrenica event, when did that actually happen?

Don't you know? you're the only one obsessing about it.

At the moment the first muslim was shot? or the last one ? or should we count number 6843 ?

That's up to the person making the claim, which would be you. Do you actually know any of that information or do you think a childish appeal to emotion will change reality?

you are succesfully debunking this material

We do our best.

 

[Paul]

So you show me what's different than what I have been saying all the time wise guy. There's no lack of accuracy.

If there wasn't a lack of accuracy you wouldn't have to keep changing your methods to obtain hits.

 

[Dutch]

It is a postdiction in that Dutch did not predict anything (as usual) and simply added the projected and planned impact date to his “correlations” after it was announced.

How stupid you are, this isn't about predicting the moon impact on October 9

 

[Dutch]

If there wasn't a lack of accuracy you wouldn't have to keep changing your methods to obtain hits.

it has never been changed. We talk about srebrenica later this month.

 

[Paul]

wide enough? 2 manmade moon impacts and Tunguska on a time span of more than a century, perfectly expressing the Golden Mean Phi.

There's nothing perfect about your calculations, why can't you admit that?

If you can't understand that

well....

I don't know what it takes

Accurate data, meaningful research, impartial analysis, understanding of some basic science etc.

 

[Paul]

Yeah, it was a good thing right?

Most people don't think so, but that's a complicated issue and out of the bounds of your black and white universe.

As if you don't really know that I was referring to the reappearance of your unfounded assertion about the date of Truman's decision.

 

[Paul]

Paul, do you understand what happens if you reply on stand alone posts now?

You use it as another excuse not to answer any questions?

 

[Paul]

What does one need? apparently its not enough for you. Not a surprise though, you will dismiss everything. your problem

Something demonstrating your claim, not another pointless and deliberate attempt to avoid the issues.

 

[Dutch]

Most people don't think so, but that's a complicated issue and out of the bounds of your black and white universe.

As if you don't really know that I was referring to the reappearance of your unfounded assertion about the date of Truman's decision.

wasn't it?

 

[Paul]

Do I really have to explain to you why Hirhoshima - Nagasaki wasn't a good thing to do? focus Paul

I doubt that you could without an over simplified emotional appeal.

Anyway, that wasn't messing with nuclear power was it, please try to respond to the actual point or question raised.



ps if you're going to add strawmen, at least try to spell them correctly.

 

[Paul]

wasn't it?

An eloquent demonstration that all your indignation and concern is mere pretence and that you have no intention of engaging in your own topic in any meaningful way.

 

[The Man]

Let me put it this way "The Man", since 'srebrenica karma' is on the timeline for later this month

Let me put it this way Dutch “srebrenica karma” is nonsensical gibberish.

When we talk about the srebrenica event, when did that actually happen?

At the moment the first muslim was shot? or the last one ? or should we count number 6843 ?

Do you understand how silly your remark is?

As I never mentioned any “srebrenica karma” or “srebrenica event” you do understand how silly your response is?

In case you missed the question while fantasizing about your “srebrenica karma” I’ll ask it again.

Please tell us how much time you think must transpire between a man (or a spacecraft with men) not being on the moon and that man (or spacecraft with men) being on the moon?

Its a pitty I have to reply to this nonsense,because other wise new readers would probably think you are succesfully debunking this material, which of cousrse isn't the case.

Trust me your continued responses can deter little from what was already quite evident very early on in this thread. Your “material” debunks itself.

wide enough? 2 manmade moon impacts and Tunguska on a time span of more than a century, perfectly expressing the Golden Mean Phi.

If you can't understand that

well....

I don't know what it takes

How about you actually having an understanding of the word "perfectly"?

You don't talk for anyone, fortunately

Hello this is anyone here, is anyone there? I guess not.

at your service. do your homework

Sorry, but apparently your class was dismissed long ago and it seems you never did any of your homework. Service yourself as much as you like, but expect others to tell you exactly what it is, simply you stroking your own ego.

That's exactly what we can expect from a rigid mind set. There's not much hope for mankind if we would all understand reality like that.

The correlations I have given pop up out of nowhere, its a personal choice how you deal with it. You just don't want to see it.

Oh, they “pop” out of somewhere all right, it is about a meter below where your head should be and that I certainly don’t want to see. As for how I deal with it, that should be obvious, simply rub your nose into your purported “correlations” until their stench becomes apparent even to you.

 

[The Man]

How stupid you are, this isn't about predicting the moon impact on October 9

How ignorant you are, no one said it was.

 

[The Man]

After I had written my previous post and crossposted it at several forums, I wanted the check the news about this moon impact so I want to space daily and guess what:
I wrote:

unbeleivable: there has been an actual impact too!!!!!
LRO Sees Apollo 14's Rocket Booster Impact Site
Oct 09, 2009
A distinctive crater about 35 meters (115 feet) in diameter was formed when the Apollo 14 Saturn IVB (upper stage) was intentionally impacted into the moon. The energy of the impact created small tremors that were measured by the seismometer placed on the Moon by Apollo 12 astronauts in 1969.

edit: picture removed, not sure if its allowed

The crater in the center of this image was formed by Apollo 14's Saturn IVB booster. The booster was intentionally impacted into the lunar surface on Feb. 4, 1971. The impact caused a minor "moonquake" that scientists used to learn about the moon's interior structure. Seismometers placed on the surface by Apollo astronauts returned data on the tremor.
http://www.moondaily.com/reports/LRO_Sees_Apollo_14_Rocket_Booster_Impact_Site_999.html
Tunguska - Moon Impact - Moon Impact
connected by Phi point Golden Mean
unbelievable
fundamental truth
next in line of thought would be that the Tunguska event and the Apollo 11 first humans on the moon would show a related event in this 'communication' that is taking place, with the first humans on the moon at Phi point.
We talk about April 13-14, 2007:
A NASA Review Board finds that the Mars Global Surveyor stopped working in November 2006 due to computer programming errors.
The Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) was a US spacecraft developed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and launched November 1996. It began the United States's return to Mars after a 10-year absence. It completed its primary mission in January 2001 and was in its third extended mission phase when, on November 2, 2006, the spacecraft failed to respond to messages and commands. A faint signal was detected three days later which indicated that the craft had gone into safe mode. All attempts to recontact the Mars Global Surveyor and resolve the problem failed. In January 2007 NASA officially ended the mission.
Mars Global Surveyor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Global_Surveyor
Panel Says Computer Error Felled Mars Orbiter
Published: April 14, 2007
Although it circled Mars longer than any other spacecraft, the Mars Global Surveyor did not die a death of old age last November, a review board assembled by NASA announced yesterday.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/14/science/space/14mars.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
The Mars Global Surveyor was taken out by Design with Earth around the same orbital position as during the launch, 10 years apart. Launched on November 7, 1996, last received message November 5, 2006.
Tunguska - humans on moon - loss of Mars Global Surveyor
the message should be clear: we must NOT go to Mars

“loss of Mars Global Surveyor”? After “It completed its primary mission” two other ‘extended mission phases’ and “was in its third extended mission phase”, yet some how you take that as a bad omen. Humans on the moon, another successful space endeavor purported as a harbinger of doom by Dutch warning us “we must NOT go to Mars”. Tell you what you stay home Dutch and well keep going to Mars.

 

[kalen]

Hyperdimensional therory involving Platonic solids? The cubic case is discussed fully by Dr. Gene Ray (cubic and wisest human).

Timecube!

The case has to be made for the other four Platonic solids. Good to see someone is on the case. Hats off to you, Dutch.